These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23088616)

  • 1. Axial displacements in external and internal implant-abutment connection.
    Lee JH; Kim DG; Park CJ; Cho LR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):e83-9. PubMed ID: 23088616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Axial displacement of abutments into implants and implant replicas, with the tapered cone-screw internal connection, as a function of tightening torque.
    Dailey B; Jordan L; Blind O; Tavernier B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 19492640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variation in the total lengths of abutment/implant assemblies generated with a function of applied tightening torque in external and internal implant-abutment connection.
    Kim KS; Lim YJ; Kim MJ; Kwon HB; Yang JH; Lee JB; Yim SH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):834-9. PubMed ID: 21198900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of different screw-tightening techniques on the strain generated on an internal-connection implant superstructure. Part 2: Models created with a splinted impression technique.
    Choi JH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1016-23. PubMed ID: 22010085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.
    Lee YJ; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Displacement and performance of abutments in narrow-diameter implants with different internal connections.
    Jacobs N; Seghi R; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jan; 127(1):100-106. PubMed ID: 33413986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Axial displacement of external and internal implant-abutment connection evaluated by linear mixed model analysis.
    Seol HW; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Kim SK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1387-99. PubMed ID: 26574863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Settling of abutments into implants and changes in removal torque in five different implant-abutment connections. Part 1: Cyclic loading.
    Kim KS; Han JS; Lim YJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1079-84. PubMed ID: 25216133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Arioli-Filho JN; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 18548918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of Intentional Overload on Joint Stability of Internal Implant-Abutment Connection System with Different Diameter.
    Lee JH; Lee W; Huh YH; Park CJ; Cho LR
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e649-e656. PubMed ID: 28872722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of different screw-tightening techniques on the stress generated on an internal-connection implant superstructure.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Kim CW; Kim MJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1045-53. PubMed ID: 20162108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Precision of fit between implant impression coping and implant replica pairs for three implant systems.
    Nicoll RJ; Sun A; Haney S; Turkyilmaz I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 23328195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N; Alikhasi M; Samadizadeh S; Beyabanaki E; Kharazifard MJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Master cast accuracy in single-tooth implant replacement cases: an in vitro comparison. A technical note.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 15973958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of repeated torque/mechanical loading cycles on two different abutment types in implants with internal tapered connections: an in vitro study.
    Ricciardi Coppedê A; de Mattos Mda G; Rodrigues RC; Ribeiro RF
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):624-32. PubMed ID: 19281502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An In Vitro Evaluation of the Loosening of Different Interchangeable Abutments in Internal-Connection-Type Implants.
    Park JM; Baek CH; Heo SJ; Kim SK; Koak JY; Kim SK; Belser UC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):350-355. PubMed ID: 28291853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of Axial Loading on the Pull-out Force of Conical Connection Abutments in Ankylos Implant.
    Hsu PF; Yao KT; Kao HC; Hsu ML
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):788-794. PubMed ID: 30024994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.