BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23089616)

  • 1. Solvent structure improves docking prediction in lectin-carbohydrate complexes.
    Gauto DF; Petruk AA; Modenutti CP; Blanco JI; Di Lella S; Martí MA
    Glycobiology; 2013 Feb; 23(2):241-58. PubMed ID: 23089616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Carbohydrate-binding proteins: Dissecting ligand structures through solvent environment occupancy.
    Gauto DF; Di Lella S; Guardia CM; Estrin DA; Martí MA
    J Phys Chem B; 2009 Jun; 113(25):8717-24. PubMed ID: 19485380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Molecular Dynamics in Mixed Solvents Reveals Protein-Ligand Interactions, Improves Docking, and Allows Accurate Binding Free Energy Predictions.
    Arcon JP; Defelipe LA; Modenutti CP; López ED; Alvarez-Garcia D; Barril X; Turjanski AG; Martí MA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Apr; 57(4):846-863. PubMed ID: 28318252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simulation of carbohydrates, from molecular docking to dynamics in water.
    Sapay N; Nurisso A; Imberty A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 924():469-83. PubMed ID: 23034760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. BALLDock/SLICK: a new method for protein-carbohydrate docking.
    Kerzmann A; Fuhrmann J; Kohlbacher O; Neumann D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1616-25. PubMed ID: 18646839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. NMR investigations of protein-carbohydrate interactions: studies on the relevance of Trp/Tyr variations in lectin binding sites as deduced from titration microcalorimetry and NMR studies on hevein domains. Determination of the NMR structure of the complex between pseudohevein and N,N',N"-triacetylchitotriose.
    Asensio JL; Siebert HC; von Der Lieth CW; Laynez J; Bruix M; Soedjanaamadja UM; Beintema JJ; Cañada FJ; Gabius HJ; Jiménez-Barbero J
    Proteins; 2000 Aug; 40(2):218-36. PubMed ID: 10842338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Expanding the frontiers of protein-protein modeling: from docking and scoring to binding affinity predictions and other challenges.
    Pallara C; Jiménez-García B; Pérez-Cano L; Romero-Durana M; Solernou A; Grosdidier S; Pons C; Moal IH; Fernandez-Recio J
    Proteins; 2013 Dec; 81(12):2192-200. PubMed ID: 23934865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterization of the galectin-1 carbohydrate recognition domain in terms of solvent occupancy.
    Di Lella S; Martí MA; Alvarez RM; Estrin DA; Ricci JC
    J Phys Chem B; 2007 Jun; 111(25):7360-6. PubMed ID: 17523619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using crystallographic water properties for the analysis and prediction of lectin-carbohydrate complex structures.
    Modenutti C; Gauto D; Radusky L; Blanco J; Turjanski A; Hajos S; Marti M
    Glycobiology; 2015 Feb; 25(2):181-96. PubMed ID: 25267604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Binding Affinity via Docking: Fact and Fiction.
    Pantsar T; Poso A
    Molecules; 2018 Jul; 23(8):. PubMed ID: 30061498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving the scoring of protein-ligand binding affinity by including the effects of structural water and electronic polarization.
    Liu J; He X; Zhang JZ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jun; 53(6):1306-14. PubMed ID: 23651068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Molecular docking of carbohydrate ligands to antibodies: structural validation against crystal structures.
    Agostino M; Jene C; Boyle T; Ramsland PA; Yuriev E
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Dec; 49(12):2749-60. PubMed ID: 19994843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Specific empirical free energy function for automated docking of carbohydrates to proteins.
    Laederach A; Reilly PJ
    J Comput Chem; 2003 Nov; 24(14):1748-57. PubMed ID: 12964193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ligand-protein docking with water molecules.
    Roberts BC; Mancera RL
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Feb; 48(2):397-408. PubMed ID: 18211049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Structure, dynamics, and interactions of jacalin. Insights from molecular dynamics simulations examined in conjunction with results of X-ray studies.
    Sharma A; Sekar K; Vijayan M
    Proteins; 2009 Dec; 77(4):760-77. PubMed ID: 19544573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. AutoMap: a tool for analyzing protein-ligand recognition using multiple ligand binding modes.
    Agostino M; Mancera RL; Ramsland PA; Yuriev E
    J Mol Graph Model; 2013 Mar; 40():80-90. PubMed ID: 23376613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling protein recognition of carbohydrates.
    Laederach A; Reilly PJ
    Proteins; 2005 Sep; 60(4):591-7. PubMed ID: 16001416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. InCa-SiteFinder: a method for structure-based prediction of inositol and carbohydrate binding sites on proteins.
    Kulharia M; Bridgett SJ; Goody RS; Jackson RM
    J Mol Graph Model; 2009 Oct; 28(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 19762259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A molecular dynamics approach to study the importance of solvent in protein interactions.
    Samsonov S; Teyra J; Pisabarro MT
    Proteins; 2008 Nov; 73(2):515-25. PubMed ID: 18452208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. S4MPLE--sampler for multiple protein-ligand entities: simultaneous docking of several entities.
    Hoffer L; Horvath D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jan; 53(1):88-102. PubMed ID: 23215156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.