136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23089813)
1. Fully moderated T-statistic for small sample size gene expression arrays.
Yu L; Gulati P; Fernandez S; Pennell M; Kirschner L; Jarjoura D
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2011 Sep; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 23089813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intensity-based hierarchical Bayes method improves testing for differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments.
Sartor MA; Tomlinson CR; Wesselkamper SC; Sivaganesan S; Leikauf GD; Medvedovic M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 7():538. PubMed ID: 17177995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Empirical Bayes models for multiple probe type microarrays at the probe level.
Astrand M; Mostad P; Rudemo M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Mar; 9():156. PubMed ID: 18366694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitivity and specificity of inferring genetic regulatory interactions from microarray experiments with dynamic Bayesian networks.
Husmeier D
Bioinformatics; 2003 Nov; 19(17):2271-82. PubMed ID: 14630656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A random variance model for detection of differential gene expression in small microarray experiments.
Wright GW; Simon RM
Bioinformatics; 2003 Dec; 19(18):2448-55. PubMed ID: 14668230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Construction of null statistics in permutation-based multiple testing for multi-factorial microarray experiments.
Gao X
Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(12):1486-94. PubMed ID: 16574697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fully moderated t-statistic in linear modeling of mixed effects for differential expression analysis.
Yu L; Zhang J; Brock G; Fernandez S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 24):675. PubMed ID: 31861977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multivariate hierarchical Bayesian model for differential gene expression analysis in microarray experiments.
Zhao H; Chan KL; Cheng LM; Yan H
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S9. PubMed ID: 18315862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microarray data analysis: a hierarchical T-test to handle heteroscedasticity.
de Menezes RX; Boer JM; van Houwelingen HC
Appl Bioinformatics; 2004; 3(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 15702953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing differential gene expression with small sample sizes in oligonucleotide arrays using a mean-variance model.
Hu J; Wright FA
Biometrics; 2007 Mar; 63(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 17447928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modified nonparametric approaches to detecting differentially expressed genes in replicated microarray experiments.
Zhao Y; Pan W
Bioinformatics; 2003 Jun; 19(9):1046-54. PubMed ID: 12801864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unequal group variances in microarray data analyses.
Demissie M; Mascialino B; Calza S; Pawitan Y
Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 24(9):1168-74. PubMed ID: 18344518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
Datta S; Datta S
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sample size calculation through the incorporation of heteroscedasticity and dependence for a penalized t-statistic in microarray experiments.
Hirakawa A; Hamada C; Yoshimura I
J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(2):260-75. PubMed ID: 22251173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bayesian mixture model based clustering of replicated microarray data.
Medvedovic M; Yeung KY; Bumgarner RE
Bioinformatics; 2004 May; 20(8):1222-32. PubMed ID: 14871871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Noise sampling method: an ANOVA approach allowing robust selection of differentially regulated genes measured by DNA microarrays.
Draghici S; Kulaeva O; Hoff B; Petrov A; Shams S; Tainsky MA
Bioinformatics; 2003 Jul; 19(11):1348-59. PubMed ID: 12874046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sample size for FDR-control in microarray data analysis.
Jung SH
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(14):3097-104. PubMed ID: 15845654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Re-sampling strategy to improve the estimation of number of null hypotheses in FDR control under strong correlation structures.
Lu X; Perkins DL
BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8():157. PubMed ID: 17509157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An empirical Bayes approach to inferring large-scale gene association networks.
Schäfer J; Strimmer K
Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 21(6):754-64. PubMed ID: 15479708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
