136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23089813)
21. Exploiting sample variability to enhance multivariate analysis of microarray data.
Möller-Levet CS; West CM; Miller CJ
Bioinformatics; 2007 Oct; 23(20):2733-40. PubMed ID: 17827205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Flexible empirical Bayes models for differential gene expression.
Lo K; Gottardo R
Bioinformatics; 2007 Feb; 23(3):328-35. PubMed ID: 17138586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Bayesian models for pooling microarray studies with multiple sources of replications.
Conlon EM; Song JJ; Liu JS
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 May; 7():247. PubMed ID: 16677390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies.
Pawitan Y; Michiels S; Koscielny S; Gusnanto A; Ploner A
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3017-24. PubMed ID: 15840707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies.
Ploner A; Calza S; Gusnanto A; Pawitan Y
Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 16368770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Estimating p-values in small microarray experiments.
Yang H; Churchill G
Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 17077100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bayesian hierarchical error model for analysis of gene expression data.
Cho H; Lee JK
Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 20(13):2016-25. PubMed ID: 15044230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Bias in the estimation of false discovery rate in microarray studies.
Pawitan Y; Murthy KR; Michiels S; Ploner A
Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(20):3865-72. PubMed ID: 16105901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. To permute or not to permute.
Huang Y; Xu H; Calian V; Hsu JC
Bioinformatics; 2006 Sep; 22(18):2244-8. PubMed ID: 16870938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Confident difference criterion: a new Bayesian differentially expressed gene selection algorithm with applications.
Yu F; Chen MH; Kuo L; Talbott H; Davis JS
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Aug; 16():245. PubMed ID: 26250443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A quantization method based on threshold optimization for microarray short time series.
Di Camillo B; Sanchez-Cabo F; Toffolo G; Nair SK; Trajanoski Z; Cobelli C
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S11. PubMed ID: 16351737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Normal uniform mixture differential gene expression detection for cDNA microarrays.
Dean N; Raftery AE
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():173. PubMed ID: 16011807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. On the use of permutation in and the performance of a class of nonparametric methods to detect differential gene expression.
Pan W
Bioinformatics; 2003 Jul; 19(11):1333-40. PubMed ID: 12874044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Nonparametric methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray data.
Troyanskaya OG; Garber ME; Brown PO; Botstein D; Altman RB
Bioinformatics; 2002 Nov; 18(11):1454-61. PubMed ID: 12424116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Hierarchical Bayes models for cDNA microarray gene expression.
Lönnstedt I; Britton T
Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):279-91. PubMed ID: 15772106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A full Bayesian hierarchical mixture model for the variance of gene differential expression.
Manda SO; Walls RE; Gilthorpe MS
BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Apr; 8():124. PubMed ID: 17439644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Significance testing for small microarray experiments.
Kooperberg C; Aragaki A; Strand AD; Olson JM
Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(15):2281-98. PubMed ID: 15889452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Gene regulatory network clustering for graph layout based on microarray gene expression data.
Kojima K; Imoto S; Nagasaki M; Miyano S
Genome Inform; 2010; 24():84-95. PubMed ID: 22081591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of Li-Wong and loglinear mixed models for the statistical analysis of oligonucleotide arrays.
Chu TM; Weir BS; Wolfinger RD
Bioinformatics; 2004 Mar; 20(4):500-6. PubMed ID: 14990445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
