These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23089842)

  • 21. For mammography, it's digital vs. screen-film.
    D'Orsi CJ; Karellas A
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D16-8. PubMed ID: 10724730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Current status and issues of screening digital mammography in Japan.
    Yamada T
    Breast Cancer; 2010 Jul; 17(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 20143190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical aspects of direct digital mammography.
    Parkin GJ
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):61-6. PubMed ID: 7734542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Digital mammographic screening in Japan.
    Ishibashi T; Kawasumi Y; Yamada T; Sai M; Uematsu T; Uchiyama N
    Breast Cancer; 2010 Jul; 17(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 20072821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Display monitors for digital medical imaging.
    Andriole KP
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jun; 2(6):543-6. PubMed ID: 17411873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Image quality assurance of soft copy display systems.
    Seto E; Ursani A; Cafazzo JA; Rossos PG; Easty AC
    J Digit Imaging; 2005 Dec; 18(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 15988625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Digital mammography for screening and diagnosis of breast cancer: an overview.
    Van Ongeval Ch
    JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 17696081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Digital mammography: are there advantages in screening for breast cancer?
    Nees AV
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Apr; 15(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 18342763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Typetesting of physical characteristics of digital mammography systems: first experiences within the Flemish breast cancer screening programme.
    Thierens H; Bosmans H; Buls N; Bacher K; De Hauwere A; Jacobs J; Clerinx P
    JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 17696080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program--the Oslo II Study.
    Skaane P; Skjennald A
    Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):197-204. PubMed ID: 15155893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Clinical results of digital mammography].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Bautz W
    Radiologe; 2005 Mar; 45(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 15744483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improved interpretation of digitized mammography with wavelet processing: a localization response operating characteristic study.
    Kallergi M; Heine JJ; Berman CG; Hersh MR; Romilly AP; Clark RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Mar; 182(3):697-703. PubMed ID: 14975972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Film-screen mammography versus digital storage plate mammography: hard copy and monitor display of microcalcifications and focal findings--a retrospective clinical and histologic analysis].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Wenkel E; Aichinger U; Tartsch M; Kuchar I; Bödicker A; Evertsz C; Peitgen HO; Bautz W
    Rofo; 2003 Sep; 175(9):1220-4. PubMed ID: 12964077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Symposium 2: the problems and the future perspectives of the digital mammography].
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Dec; 69(12):1419-35. PubMed ID: 24366563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Image quality in digital mammography: image acquisition.
    Williams MB; Yaffe MJ; Maidment AD; Martin MC; Seibert JA; Pisano ED
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):589-608. PubMed ID: 17412134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Report of the Working Group on Digital Mammography: Digital Displays and Workstation Design. Washington DC, USA. March 19-10, 1998.
    Acad Radiol; 1999 Apr; 6 Suppl 4():S195-219. PubMed ID: 10894306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Laser printers in digital mammography.
    Bogucki TM; Haus AG
    Adm Radiol J; 1997; 16(6-7):14-8. PubMed ID: 10170267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Soft copy digital mammography.
    Kim HH
    Korean J Radiol; 2005; 6(4):206-7. PubMed ID: 16374076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of full-field digital mammography workstation and conventional picture archiving and communication system in image quality and diagnostic performance.
    Kang BJ; Kim SH; Choi BG
    Clin Imaging; 2011; 35(5):336-40. PubMed ID: 21872121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Lesion size inaccuracies in digital mammography.
    Paquelet JR; Hendrick RE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):W115-8. PubMed ID: 20028882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.