204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2308991)
41. [Isolation of mononuclear cells from the bone marrow of patients with hemoblastoses using one-step ficoll-verographin density gradient separation].
Pavlushina SV; Orlova TG; Tabagari DZ
Eksp Onkol; 1984; 6(2):68-70. PubMed ID: 6595113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Comparison of whole bone marrow culture method and density gradient centrifugation method of isolating hBMSCs].
Huang Q; Wu T; Liang J; Yang K; Jin D
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Nov; 23(11):1360-4. PubMed ID: 19968181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Bone marrow-resident memory T cells survive pretransplant chemotherapy and contribute to early immune reconstitution of patients with acute myeloid leukemia given mafosfamide-purged autologous bone marrow transplantation.
Casorati G; Locatelli F; Pagani S; Garavaglia C; Montini E; Lisini D; Turin I; Rossi F; Dellabona P; Maccario R; Montagna D
Exp Hematol; 2005 Feb; 33(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 15676215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Alterations in both the hematopoietic microenvironment and the progenitor cell population follow the recovery from myeloablative therapy and bone marrow transplantation.
Novitzky N; Mohamed R
Exp Hematol; 1995 Dec; 23(14):1661-6. PubMed ID: 8542962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Purification of murine bone-marrow-derived granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming cells.
Williams DE; Straneva JE; Shen RN; Broxmeyer HE
Exp Hematol; 1987 Mar; 15(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 3817051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A comparison between two different procedures for bone marrow processing: a semiautomated procedure vs manual starch sedimentation.
Menichella G; Pierelli L; Serafini R; Foddai ML; Vittori M; Paoloni A; De Martini M; Rossi PL; Mango G; Bizzi B
Haematologica; 1991 Mar; 76 Suppl 1():12-4. PubMed ID: 1713872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Variability in 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide activity during clinical purging for autologous bone marrow transplantation.
Jones RJ; Zuehlsdorf M; Rowley SD; Hilton J; Santos GW; Sensenbrenner LL; Colvin OM
Blood; 1987 Nov; 70(5):1490-4. PubMed ID: 3311205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. In vitro evaluation of combination drug purging for autologous bone marrow transplantation.
Jones RJ; Miller CB; Zehnbauer BA; Rowley SD; Colvin OM; Sensenbrenner LL
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1990 May; 5(5):301-7. PubMed ID: 2350626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Bone marrow processing for transplantation using a Fenwal CS3000 Plus cell separator and a revised version of the Georgetown University procedure: comparison with a starch sedimentation method.
Smith RJ; Roath S
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1994; 389():705-10. PubMed ID: 7700938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Umbilical cord blood collection and separation for haematopoietic progenitor cell banking.
Ademokun JA; Chapman C; Dunn J; Lander D; Mair K; Proctor SJ; Dickinson AM
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1997 May; 19(10):1023-8. PubMed ID: 9169647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Phase I study of combination drug purging for autologous bone marrow transplantation.
Rowley SD; Miller CB; Piantadosi S; Davis JM; Santos GW; Jones RJ
J Clin Oncol; 1991 Dec; 9(12):2210-8. PubMed ID: 1960561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Elimination of red blood cells from marrow suspension prior to transplantation using polysaccharide-ditrizoate gradient centrifugation. Experimental studies.
Ratajczak MZ; Szczylik C; Wiktor-Jedrzejczak W
Folia Haematol Int Mag Klin Morphol Blutforsch; 1989; 116(3-4):469-73. PubMed ID: 2480292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. CD34(+) hematopoietic progenitor cell selection of bone marrow grafts for autologous transplantation in pediatric patients.
Kasow KA; Sims-Poston L; Eldridge P; Hale GA
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2007 May; 13(5):608-14. PubMed ID: 17448921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Factors affecting volume reduction and red blood cell depletion of bone marrow on the COBE Spectra cell separator before haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Guttridge MG; Sidders C; Booth-Davey E; Pamphilon D; Watt SM
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2006 Aug; 38(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 16770313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Size and density characterization of human committed and multipotent hematopoietic progenitors.
Lasky LC; Zanjani ED
Exp Hematol; 1985 Aug; 13(7):680-4. PubMed ID: 4029293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A simple procedure for large-scale density separation of bone marrow cells for transplantation.
Thomas TE; Abraham SJ; Phillips GL; Lansdorp PM
Transplantation; 1992 May; 53(5):1163-5. PubMed ID: 1585485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Role of cytoprotective mechanisms in the photochemical purging of autologous bone marrow grafts.
Yamazaki T; Sato Y; Sieber F
Exp Hematol; 1997 Jul; 25(7):629-37. PubMed ID: 9216739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Failure of bone marrow cryopreservation in chronic granulocytic leukemia: relation to excessive granulo-macrophagic progenitor pool.
Douay L; Lopez M; Gorin NC; Nauman A; Giarratana MC; Laporte JP; Stachowiak J; Salmon C; Duhamel G
Int J Cell Cloning; 1986 Jul; 4(4):250-62. PubMed ID: 2875118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Removal of neuroblastoma cells from bone marrow by a direct monoclonal antibody rosetting technique.
Berthold F; Schumacher R; Schneider A; Bosslet K; Reiter C
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1989 May; 4(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 2659112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Immunopharmacologic purging of breast cancer from bone marrow for autologous bone marrow transplantation.
Shpall EJ; Anderson IC; Bast RC; Joines WT; Jones RB; Ross M; Edwards S; Eggleston S; Johnston C; Tepperberg M
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 333():321-35; discussion 336. PubMed ID: 2308989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
