1260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23091993)
1. Fallopian tubal patency diagnosed by magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography.
Ma L; Wu G; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Wang J; Li L; Zhou W
J Reprod Med; 2012; 57(9-10):435-40. PubMed ID: 23091993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feasibility of dynamic MR-hysterosalpingography for the diagnostic work-up of infertile women.
Winter L; Glücker T; Steimann S; Fröhlich JM; Steinbrich W; De Geyter C; Pegios W
Acta Radiol; 2010 Jul; 51(6):693-701. PubMed ID: 20482222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MR hysterosalpingography with an angiographic time-resolved 3D pulse sequence: assessment of tubal patency.
Sadowski EA; Ochsner JE; Riherd JM; Korosec FR; Agrawal G; Pritts EA; Kliewer MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1381-5. PubMed ID: 18941073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of assessing the patency of the Fallopian tubes during laparoscopy and during hysterosalpingography on television in infertile women with endometriosis].
Salata I; Gottwald L; Sobkiewicz S
Ginekol Pol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):1014-7. PubMed ID: 14674161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of tubal patency in infertile women: an observational study.
De Felice C; Rech F; Marini A; Stagnitti A; Valente F; Cipolla V; Borgogni G; Meggiorini ML
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2012; 39(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 22675963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional dynamic MR hysterosalpingography: a preliminary report.
Wiesner W; Ruehm SG; Bongartz G; Kaim A; Reese E; De Geyter C
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(8):1439-44. PubMed ID: 11519555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in diagnostic work-up of female infertility - comparison with conventional hysterosalpingography: a randomised study.
Volondat M; Fontas E; Delotte J; Fatfouta I; Chevallier P; Chassang M
Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):501-508. PubMed ID: 29974219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional dynamic MR-hysterosalpingography; a new, low invasive, radiation-free and less painful radiological approach to female infertility.
Unterweger M; De Geyter C; Fröhlich JM; Bongartz G; Wiesner W
Hum Reprod; 2002 Dec; 17(12):3138-41. PubMed ID: 12456613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MR hysterosalpingography in a rabbit model.
Lee FT; Grist TM; Nelson KG; Chosy SG; Rappe AH; Shapiro SS; Kelcz F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1996; 6(2):300-4. PubMed ID: 9132095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography and conventional hysterosalpingography: direct visualization of the fallopian tubes using a novel MRI contrast agent mixture.
Duan N; Chen X; Yin Y; Wang Z; Chen R
Acta Radiol; 2020 Jul; 61(7):1001-1007. PubMed ID: 31684746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in infertile women].
Vasiljević M; Ganović R; Jovanović R; Marković A
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1996; 124(5-6):135-8. PubMed ID: 9102833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparative study on assessment of tubal patency among tubal insufflation, hydrotubation, hysterosalpingography and chromotubation under laparoscopy].
Zuo W; Wang P
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1996 Jan; 31(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 8758816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography vs. magnetic resonance-hysterosalpingography for diagnosing fallopian tubal patency: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen LS; Zhu ZQ; Li J; Wang ZT; Qiang Y; Hu XY; Zhang MM; Wang ZQ
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Apr; 125():108891. PubMed ID: 32088657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MR hysterosalpingography: protocol development and refinement for simulating normal and abnormal fallopian tube patency--feasibility study with a phantom.
Frye RE; Ascher SM; Thomasson D
Radiology; 2000 Jan; 214(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 10644108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnosis of fallopian tube patency.
Shah SM; Towobola OA; Masihleho M
East Afr Med J; 2005 Sep; 82(9):457-62. PubMed ID: 16619719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating Fallopian Tube Patency: What the Radiologist Needs to Know.
Grigovich M; Kacharia VS; Bharwani N; Hemingway A; Mijatovic V; Rodgers SK
Radiographics; 2021 Oct; 41(6):1876-18961. PubMed ID: 34597232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity of hysterosalpingography after tubal surgery.
Letterie GS; Haggerty MF; Fellows DW
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1992; 251(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 1386980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The assessment of endometrial pathology and tubal patency: a comparison between the use of ultrasonography and X-ray hysterosalpingography for the investigation of infertility patients.
Strandell A; Bourne T; Bergh C; Granberg S; Asztely M; Thorburn J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 14(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 10550881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Analysis of 1006 cases with selective salpingography and fallopian tube recanalization].
Li QY; Zhou XL; Qin HP; Liu R
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Feb; 39(2):80-2. PubMed ID: 15059580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography in examination of Fallopian tubes in infertile women].
Bacevac J; Ganović R
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2001; 129(1-2):18-21. PubMed ID: 11534279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
