154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23092094)
1. [A 10-week safety and efficacy evaluation of olopatadine, 0.2% instilled twice-daily in patients with allergic conjunctivitis in Japan].
Ohno S; Ando M
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2012 Sep; 116(9):869-79. PubMed ID: 23092094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [A multicenter, double-masked, randomized evaluation of olopatadine 0.2% using the conjunctival allergen challenge model in Japanese patients with allergic conjunctivitis].
Ohno S;
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2012 Dec; 116(12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 23379201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of preservative-free ketotifen fumarate and preserved olopatadine hydrochloride eye drops in the treatment of moderate to severe seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.
Mortemousque B; Bourcier T; Khairallah M; Messaoud R; Brignole-Baudouin F; Renault D; Rebika H; Brémond-Gignac D;
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2014 Jan; 37(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 24388379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of olopatadine ophthalmic solution 0.2% in reducing signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis.
Abelson MB; Gomes PJ; Pasquine T; Edwards MR; Gross RD; Robertson SM
Allergy Asthma Proc; 2007; 28(4):427-33. PubMed ID: 17883910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and cromolyn sodium 2% ophthalmic solution in seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.
Katelaris CH; Ciprandi G; Missotten L; Turner FD; Bertin D; Berdeaux G;
Clin Ther; 2002 Oct; 24(10):1561-75. PubMed ID: 12462286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparison of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution versus placebo for controlling the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis and rhinoconjunctivitis.
Abelson MB; Turner D
Clin Ther; 2003 Mar; 25(3):931-47. PubMed ID: 12852709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Olopatadine ophthalmic solution adjunctive to loratadine compared with loratadine alone in patients with active seasonal allergic conjunctivitis symptoms.
Lanier BQ; Gross RD; Marks BB; Cockrum PC; Juniper EF
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2001 Jun; 86(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 11428736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Combined analysis of two studies using the conjunctival allergen challenge model to evaluate olopatadine hydrochloride, a new ophthalmic antiallergic agent with dual activity.
Abelson MB; Spitalny L
Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jun; 125(6):797-804. PubMed ID: 9645717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the clinical efficacy of pheniramine maleate/naphazoline hydrochloride ophthalmic solution and olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Greiner JV; Udell IJ
Clin Ther; 2005 May; 27(5):568-77. PubMed ID: 15978305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of epinastine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution in allergic conjunctivitis by conjunctival cedar pollen allergen challenge.
Fujishima H; Ohashi Y; Takamura E
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2014 Oct; 113(4):476-81. PubMed ID: 25163405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Loteprednol etabonate suspension 0.2% administered QID compared with olopatadine solution 0.1% administered BID in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis: a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group study in Chinese patients.
Gong L; Sun X; Qu J; Wang L; Zhang M; Zhang H; Wang L; Gu Y; Elion-Mboussa A; Roy L; Zhu B
Clin Ther; 2012 Jun; 34(6):1259-1272.e1. PubMed ID: 22627057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy and comfort of olopatadine 0.2% versus epinastine 0.05% ophthalmic solution for treating itching and redness induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.
Mah FS; Rosenwasser LJ; Townsend WD; Greiner JV; Bensch G
Curr Med Res Opin; 2007 Jun; 23(6):1445-52. PubMed ID: 17559743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the effects of olopatadine ophthalmic solution, 0.2% on the ocular surface of patients with allergic conjunctivitis and dry eye.
Mah FS; O'Brien T; Kim T; Torkildsen G
Curr Med Res Opin; 2008 Feb; 24(2):441-7. PubMed ID: 18167176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of olopatadine 0.2% ophthalmic solution versus fluticasone furoate nasal spray for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis.
Rosenwasser LJ; Mahr T; Abelson MB; Gomes PJ; Kennedy K
Allergy Asthma Proc; 2008; 29(6):644-53. PubMed ID: 19063816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of olopatadine HCI 0.1%, ketotifen fumarate 0.025%, epinastine HCI 0.05%, emedastine 0.05% and fluorometholone acetate 0.1% ophthalmic solutions for seasonal allergic conjunctivitis: a placebo-controlled environmental trial.
Borazan M; Karalezli A; Akova YA; Akman A; Kiyici H; Erbek SS
Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Aug; 87(5):549-54. PubMed ID: 18631332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ketotifen fumarate and olopatadine hydrochloride in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis: a real-world comparison of efficacy and ocular comfort.
Ganz M; Koll E; Gausche J; Detjen P; Orfan N
Adv Ther; 2003; 20(2):79-91. PubMed ID: 12836808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the effects of ketotifen fumarate 0.025% and olopatadine HCl 0.1% ophthalmic solutions in seasonal allergic conjunctivities: a 30-day, randomized, double-masked, artificial tear substitute-controlled trial.
Avunduk AM; Tekelioglu Y; Turk A; Akyol N
Clin Ther; 2005 Sep; 27(9):1392-402. PubMed ID: 16291412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy and comfort of olopatadine versus ketotifen ophthalmic solutions: a double-masked, environmental study of patient preference.
Leonardi A; Zafirakis P
Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Aug; 20(8):1167-73. PubMed ID: 15324519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy and acceptability of nedocromil sodium 2% and olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% in perennial allergic conjunctivitis.
Alexander M; Allegro S; Hicks A
Adv Ther; 2000; 17(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 11183450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of olopatadine ophthalmic solution (0.1%) versus ketorolac ophthalmic solution (0.5%) using the provocative antigen challenge model.
Deschenes J; Discepola M; Abelson M
Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 1999; (228):47-52. PubMed ID: 10337433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
