These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23092147)

  • 1. Dimensional accuracy of optical bite registration in single and multiple unit restorations.
    Iwaki Y; Wakabayashi N; Igarashi Y
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 23092147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel computer-aided method to fabricate a custom one-piece glass fiber dowel-and-core based on digitized impression and crown preparation data.
    Chen Z; Li Y; Deng X; Wang X
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):276-83. PubMed ID: 24118182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision.
    Ender A; Mehl A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23395338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.
    Persson AS; Odén A; Andersson M; Sandborgh-Englund G
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.
    Delong R; Ko CC; Anderson GC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 12488856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography.
    White AJ; Fallis DW; Vandewalle KS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):456.e1-9; discussion 456-7. PubMed ID: 20362900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the accuracy of a 3-dimensional virtual method and the conventional method for transferring the maxillary cast to a virtual articulator.
    Solaberrieta E; Mínguez R; Barrenetxea L; Otegi JR; Szentpétery A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Mar; 113(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 25557006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the contact surface pattern between virtual and milled Cerec 3D full-ceramic crowns.
    Hartung F; Kordass B
    Int J Comput Dent; 2006 Apr; 9(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 16955650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reporting numeric values of complete crowns. Part 1: Clinical preparation parameters.
    Tiu J; Al-Amleh B; Waddell JN; Duncan WJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 25858212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved digital transfer of the maxillary cast to a virtual articulator.
    Solaberrieta E; Otegi JR; Mínguez R; Etxaniz O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):921-4. PubMed ID: 24836282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Axial Tooth Contour Alteration Following Fixed Prosthodontic Treatment.
    Abduo J
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2014 Dec; 22(4):174-82. PubMed ID: 26466442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of virtual and manual tooth setups with digital and plaster models in extraction cases.
    Im J; Cha JY; Lee KJ; Yu HS; Hwang CJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 24703281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of a conventional and virtual occlusal record.
    Solaberrieta E; Otegi JR; Goicoechea N; Brizuela A; Pradies G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 25858220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Overjet at the anterior and posterior segments: three-dimensional analysis of arch coordination.
    Kook YA; Bayome M; Park SB; Cha BK; Lee YW; Baek SH
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 19413384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer copings for partial coverage.
    Denissen H; van der Zel J; Reisig J; Vlaar S; de Ruiter W; van Waas R
    Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Apr; 2(2):113-27. PubMed ID: 11351490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chairside multi-unit restoration of a quadrant using the new Cerec 3D software.
    Ender A; Wiedhahn K; Mörmann WH
    Int J Comput Dent; 2003 Jan; 6(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 12838593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the occlusal contact of crowns fabricated with the bite impression method.
    Makino S; Okada D; Shin C; Ogura R; Ikeda M; Miura H
    J Med Dent Sci; 2013 Sep; 60(3):73-81. PubMed ID: 24146169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Point-to-point registration with mandibulo-maxillary splint in open and closed jaw position. Evaluation of registration accuracy for computer-aided surgery of the mandible.
    Bettschart C; Kruse A; Matthews F; Zemann W; Obwegeser JA; Grätz KW; Lübbers HT
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 40(7):592-8. PubMed ID: 22079336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of 5 types of interocclusal recording materials on the accuracy of articulation of digital models.
    Sweeney S; Smith DK; Messersmith M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 26232833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-Dimensional Static Articulation Accuracy of Virtual Models-Part II: Effect of Model Scanner-CAD Systems and Articulation Method.
    Yee SHX; Esguerra RJ; Chew AAQ; Wong KM; Tan KBC
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):137-144. PubMed ID: 29210502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.