These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23092147)

  • 41. Reporting numeric values of complete crowns. Part 2: Retention and resistance theories.
    Tiu J; Al-Amleh B; Waddell JN; Duncan WJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 25858217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A cone-beam computed tomography triple scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning.
    Swennen GR; Mollemans W; De Clercq C; Abeloos J; Lamoral P; Lippens F; Neyt N; Casselman J; Schutyser F
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 19276829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression.
    Luthardt RG; Loos R; Quaas S
    Int J Comput Dent; 2005 Oct; 8(4):283-94. PubMed ID: 16689029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Improving the digital workflow: direct transfer from patient to virtual articulator.
    Solaberrieta E; Minguez R; Etxaniz O; Barrenetxea L
    Int J Comput Dent; 2013; 16(4):285-92. PubMed ID: 24555405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Fusion of computed tomography data and optical 3D images of the dentition for streak artefact correction in the simulation of orthognathic surgery.
    Nkenke E; Zachow S; Benz M; Maier T; Veit K; Kramer M; Benz S; Häusler G; Neukam FW; Lell M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jul; 33(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 15533975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Digital Michigan splint - from intraoral scanning to plasterless manufacturing.
    Dedem P; Türp JC
    Int J Comput Dent; 2016; 19(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 27027103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The accuracy of virtual interocclusal registration during intraoral scanning.
    Edher F; Hannam AG; Tobias DL; Wyatt CCL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):904-912. PubMed ID: 29961618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touch-probe scanner.
    Persson A; Andersson M; Oden A; Sandborgh-Englund G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 16543016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Monolithic zirconia: minimizing adjustments.
    Holt LR; Boksman L
    Dent Today; 2012 Dec; 31(12):78, 80-1. PubMed ID: 23350271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparative evaluation of the curve of Spee in two age groups and its relation to posterior teeth disclusion.
    Mohan M; D'Souza M; Kamath G; Parolia A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(1):179. PubMed ID: 21525705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [The impact of occlusal plane orientation method on intercuspal occlusion estimation].
    Zhulev EN; Bogatova EA; Ershov PE; Lepakhina AA
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2013; 92(6):48-50. PubMed ID: 24429790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A comparative study of two CEREC software systems in evaluating manufacturing time and accuracy of restorations.
    Reich SM; Peltz ID; Wichmann M; Estafan DJ
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 15960477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Bite registration in Cerec and in lab.
    Frank E; Frank S
    Int J Comput Dent; 2012; 15(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 22891418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of overjet among 3 arch types in normal occlusion.
    Kim BI; Bayome M; Kim Y; Baek SH; Han SH; Kim SH; Kook YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):e253-60. PubMed ID: 21392669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Accuracy of check-bite registration and centric condylar position.
    Utz KH; Müller F; Lückerath W; Fuss E; Koeck B
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 May; 29(5):458-66. PubMed ID: 12028494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Convergence angles of metal ceramic crowns prepared by dental students.
    Marghalani TY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1250-6. PubMed ID: 24932720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Design for functional occlusal surface of CAD/CAM crown using VR articulator.
    Ikawa T; Ogawa T; Shigeta Y; Kasama S; Hirabayashi R; Fukushima S; Hattori A; Suzuki N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 163():239-41. PubMed ID: 21335796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Single step approach to make diagnostic impressions of both the arches and face bow transfer: a novel technique.
    Komuravelli AK; Suresh Sajjan MC
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 22842240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of clinical bracket point registration with 3D laser scanner and coordinate measuring machine.
    Nouri M; Farzan A; Baghban AR; Massudi R
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 25741826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Digital impressions for the fabrication of aesthetic ceramic restorations: a case report.
    Glassman S
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2009; 21(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 19456058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.