These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23092219)

  • 21. Cross-modal interference-control is reduced in childhood but maintained in aging: A cohort study of stimulus- and response-interference in cross-modal and unimodal Stroop tasks.
    Hirst RJ; Kicks EC; Allen HA; Cragg L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):553-572. PubMed ID: 30945905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Spatial S-R compatibility: positional instruction vs. compatibility instruction.
    Heister G; Schroeder-Heister P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1994 Feb; 85(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 8165921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dual-task performance reveals increased involvement of executive control in fine motor sequencing in healthy aging.
    Fraser SA; Li KZ; Penhune VB
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2010 Sep; 65(5):526-35. PubMed ID: 20478900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Parallel dual-task processing and task-shielding in older and younger adults: Behavioral and diffusion model results.
    Janczyk M; Mittelstädt P; Wienrich's C
    Exp Aging Res; 2018; 44(2):95-116. PubMed ID: 29336726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of the location of ordered symbols on the ordinal position effect: The involvement of the task performed.
    Shi W; Wang Q; Deng M; Xu D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jan; 202():102978. PubMed ID: 31790912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Age-related differences in switching between cognitive tasks: does internal control ability decline with age?
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Kuhns D
    Psychol Aging; 2008 Jun; 23(2):330-41. PubMed ID: 18573007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Differential dynamics of spatial and non-spatial stimulus-response compatibility effects: a dual task LRP study.
    Lehle C; Cohen A; Sangals J; Sommer W; Stürmer B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jan; 136(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 21030005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of associative learning on age differences in task-set switching.
    Kray J; Eppinger B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Nov; 123(3):187-203. PubMed ID: 16564483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of degraded viewing on visual asymmetry patterns in older adults.
    Dollinger SM
    Exp Aging Res; 1995; 21(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 7744170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Age and task difficulty differences in dual tasking using circle tracing and serial subtraction tasks.
    Vaportzis E; Georgiou-Karistianis N; Stout JC
    Aging Clin Exp Res; 2014 Apr; 26(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 24136448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Changes of performance monitoring with learning in older and younger adults.
    Pietschmann M; Simon K; Endrass T; Kathmann N
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Jul; 45(4):559-68. PubMed ID: 18266802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effects of color and preretinal aging on embedded figures test performance: a failure to replicate.
    Ball LJ; Pollack RH
    Exp Aging Res; 1989; 15(3-4):177-80. PubMed ID: 2638636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stimulus-response compatibility and position of the hands: nonadditive effects.
    Ghozlan A
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Jun; 86(3 Pt 1):843-50. PubMed ID: 9656279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Can practice overcome age-related differences in the psychological refractory period effect?
    Maquestiaux F; Hartley AA; Bertsch J
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Dec; 19(4):649-67. PubMed ID: 15584790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The psychological refractory period: evidence for age differences in attentional time-sharing.
    Allen PA; Smith AF; Vires-Collins H; Sperry S
    Psychol Aging; 1998 Jun; 13(2):218-29. PubMed ID: 9640583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Two Simon tasks with different sources of conflict: an ERP study of motion- and location-based compatibility effects.
    Galashan D; Wittfoth M; Fehr T; Herrmann M
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Jul; 78(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 18436365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Age-related sparing of parafoveal lexical processing.
    Grabbe JW; Allen PA
    Exp Aging Res; 2013; 39(4):419-44. PubMed ID: 23875839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Observer's control of the moving stimulus increases the flash-lag effect.
    Scocchia L; Grosso RA; de'Sperati C; Stucchi N; Baud-Bovy G
    Vision Res; 2009 Sep; 49(19):2363-70. PubMed ID: 19596025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Exploring cross-task compatibility in perceiving and producing facial expressions using electromyography.
    Otte E; Jost K; Habel U; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):187-92. PubMed ID: 21737052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.