These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23092543)
21. Prediction of functional outcomes after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: results of conditional survival analyses. Abdollah F; Sun M; Suardi N; Gallina A; Bianchi M; Tutolo M; Passoni N; Tian Z; Salonia A; Colombo R; Rigatti P; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Briganti A Eur Urol; 2012 Jul; 62(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 22421080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Beyond the learning curve of the Retzius-sparing approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of the first 200 patients with ≥ 1 year of follow-up. Galfano A; Di Trapani D; Sozzi F; Strada E; Petralia G; Bramerio M; Ascione A; Gambacorta M; Bocciardi AM Eur Urol; 2013 Dec; 64(6):974-80. PubMed ID: 23856036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does surgeon subjective nerve sparing score predict recovery time of erectile function following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy? Kang SG; Schatloff O; Haidar AM; Samavedi S; Palmer KJ; Cheon J; Patel VR J Sex Med; 2015 Jun; 12(6):1490-6. PubMed ID: 25689342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Coelho RF; Chauhan S; Orvieto MA; Sivaraman A; Palmer KJ; Coughlin G; Patel VR Eur Urol; 2011 Jan; 59(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 20801579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cavernosal nerve preservation during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is a graded rather than an all-or-none phenomenon: objective demonstration by assessment of residual nerve tissue on surgical specimens. Schatloff O; Chauhan S; Kameh D; Valero R; Ko YH; Sivaraman A; Coelho RF; Marquinez J; Palmer KJ; Patel VR Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):596-600. PubMed ID: 22386406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Ficarra V; Novara G; Ahlering TE; Costello A; Eastham JA; Graefen M; Guazzoni G; Menon M; Mottrie A; Patel VR; Van der Poel H; Rosen RC; Tewari AK; Wilson TG; Zattoni F; Montorsi F Eur Urol; 2012 Sep; 62(3):418-30. PubMed ID: 22749850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. How does robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) compare with open surgery in men with high-risk prostate cancer? Punnen S; Meng MV; Cooperberg MR; Greene KL; Cowan JE; Carroll PR BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(4):E314-20. PubMed ID: 23451984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Robotic radical prostatectomy for elderly patients: probability of achieving continence and potency 1 year after surgery. Shikanov S; Desai V; Razmaria A; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL J Urol; 2010 May; 183(5):1803-7. PubMed ID: 20299041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dehydrated Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane Allograft Nerve Wrap Around the Prostatic Neurovascular Bundle Accelerates Early Return to Continence and Potency Following Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Propensity Score-matched Analysis. Patel VR; Samavedi S; Bates AS; Kumar A; Coelho R; Rocco B; Palmer K Eur Urol; 2015 Jun; 67(6):977-980. PubMed ID: 25613153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of outcomes between pure laparoscopic vs robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a study of comparative effectiveness based upon validated quality of life outcomes. Willis DL; Gonzalgo ML; Brotzman M; Feng Z; Trock B; Su LM BJU Int; 2012 Mar; 109(6):898-905. PubMed ID: 21933328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. How to optimize patient selection for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: functional outcome analyses from a tertiary referral center. Gandaglia G; Suardi N; Gallina A; Zaffuto E; Cucchiara V; Vizziello D; Shariat S; Cantiello F; Damiano R; Guazzoni G; Montorsi F; Briganti A J Endourol; 2014 Jul; 28(7):792-800. PubMed ID: 24660774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Perioperative and early oncological outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in morbidly obese patients: a propensity score-matched study. Abdul-Muhsin H; Giedelman C; Samavedi S; Schatloff O; Coelho R; Rocco B; Palmer K; Ebra G; Patel V BJU Int; 2014 Jan; 113(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 23461310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of a risk-stratified grade of nerve-sparing technique on early return of continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Srivastava A; Chopra S; Pham A; Sooriakumaran P; Durand M; Chughtai B; Gruschow S; Peyser A; Harneja N; Leung R; Lee R; Herman M; Robinson B; Shevchuk M; Tewari A Eur Urol; 2013 Mar; 63(3):438-44. PubMed ID: 22901982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Uroflow Stop Test and Potency Recovery: A Surrogate for Pelvic Floor Integrity Post Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy? Alenizi AM; Bienz M; Rajih E; Alesawi A; Al-Hathal N; Benayoun S; Lebeau T; Zorn KC; El-Hakim A Urology; 2015 Oct; 86(4):766-71. PubMed ID: 26254170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Toggling Technique Allows Retrograde Early Release to Facilitate Neurovascular Bundle Sparing During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score-Matching Study. Shim JS; Tae JH; Noh TI; Kang SH; Cheon J; Lee JG; Patel VR; Kang SG J Korean Med Sci; 2022 Jan; 37(1):e6. PubMed ID: 34981681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prospective evaluation of urinary incontinence, voiding symptoms and quality of life after open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Geraerts I; Van Poppel H; Devoogdt N; Van Cleynenbreugel B; Joniau S; Van Kampen M BJU Int; 2013 Nov; 112(7):936-43. PubMed ID: 23937206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Current status of various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Kumar A; Tandon S; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Patel VR J Robot Surg; 2016 Sep; 10(3):187-200. PubMed ID: 27251473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Preserved postoperative penile size correlates well with maintained erectile function after bilateral nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Briganti A; Fabbri F; Salonia A; Gallina A; Chun FK; Dehò F; Zanni G; Suardi N; Karakiewicz PI; Rigatti P; Montorsi F Eur Urol; 2007 Sep; 52(3):702-7. PubMed ID: 17418936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of combined oncologic and functional outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: trifecta rate of achieving continence, potency and cancer control. Xylinas E; Durand X; Ploussard G; Campeggi A; Allory Y; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L Urol Oncol; 2013 Jan; 31(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 21719321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of nerve sparing technique on patient self-assessed outcomes after radical perineal prostatectomy. Kübler HR; Tseng TY; Sun L; Vieweg J; Harris MJ; Dahm P J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):488-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17561133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]