These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23092988)

  • 1. The survival and proliferation of fibroblasts on ceramic implants: an in vitro study.
    Kunert-Keil C; Gredes T; Richter DU; Szyba M; Dominiak M; Gedrange T
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2012 Jan; 57(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 23092988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of biocompatibility and osseointegration of ceramic and titanium implants: an in vivo and in vitro study.
    Möller B; Terheyden H; Açil Y; Purcz NM; Hertrampf K; Tabakov A; Behrens E; Wiltfang J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 41(5):638-45. PubMed ID: 22406235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Removal torque and histomorphometric evaluation of bioceramic grit-blasted/acid-etched and dual acid-etched implant surfaces: an experimental study in dogs.
    Marin C; Granato R; Suzuki M; Gil JN; Piattelli A; Coelho PG
    J Periodontol; 2008 Oct; 79(10):1942-9. PubMed ID: 18834250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants.
    Orsini G; Assenza B; Scarano A; Piattelli M; Piattelli A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 11151575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ceramic implant abutments: cutting efficiency and resultant surface finish by diamond rotary cutting instruments.
    Park SW; Driscoll CF; Romberg EE; Siegel S; Thompson G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 16765157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model.
    Al-Nawas B; Groetz KA; Goetz H; Duschner H; Wagner W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17944964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Importance of Ca(2+) modifications for osseointegration of smooth and moderately rough anodized titanium implants - a removal torque and histological evaluation in rabbit.
    Fröjd V; Wennerberg A; Franke Stenport V
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Oct; 14(5):737-45. PubMed ID: 20977616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of chemically and pharmaceutically modified titanium and zirconia implant surfaces in dentistry: a study in sheep.
    Langhoff JD; Voelter K; Scharnweber D; Schnabelrauch M; Schlottig F; Hefti T; Kalchofner K; Nuss K; von Rechenberg B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 37(12):1125-32. PubMed ID: 18977118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Osteoblast-like cell attachment and proliferation on turned, blasted, and anodized titanium surfaces.
    Pae A; Kim SS; Kim HS; Woo YH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):475-81. PubMed ID: 21691593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits.
    Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Zafiropoulos GG; Andreana S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Growth, viability, adhesion potential, and fibronectin expression in fibroblasts cultured on zirconia or feldspatic ceramics in vitro.
    Raffaelli L; Rossi Iommetti P; Piccioni E; Toesca A; Serini S; Resci F; Missori M; De Spirito M; Manicone PF; Calviello G
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2008 Sep; 86(4):959-68. PubMed ID: 18067158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro biological effects of titanium rough surface obtained by calcium phosphate grid blasting.
    Citeau A; Guicheux J; Vinatier C; Layrolle P; Nguyen TP; Pilet P; Daculsi G
    Biomaterials; 2005 Jan; 26(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 15207462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits.
    Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Zr61Ti2Cu25Al12 metallic glass for potential use in dental implants: biocompatibility assessment by in vitro cellular responses.
    Li J; Shi LL; Zhu ZD; He Q; Ai HJ; Xu J
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2013 May; 33(4):2113-21. PubMed ID: 23498239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biocompatibility in vitro of titanium dental implants. Immunocytochemical expression of fibronectin and extracellular matrix receptors.
    Grill V; Sandrucci MA; Rizzo R; Narducci P; Bareggi R; Dorigo E
    Minerva Stomatol; 2000 Mar; 49(3):77-85. PubMed ID: 20047205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of surface treatment on cell responses to grades 4 and 5 titanium for orthodontic mini-implants.
    Galli C; Piemontese M; Ravanetti F; Lumetti S; Passeri G; Gandolfini M; Macaluso GM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jun; 141(6):705-14. PubMed ID: 22640672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The removal of Al2O3 particles from grit-blasted titanium implant surfaces: effects on biocompatibility, osseointegration and interface strength in vivo.
    Rüger M; Gensior TJ; Herren C; von Walter M; Ocklenburg C; Marx R; Erli HJ
    Acta Biomater; 2010 Jul; 6(7):2852-61. PubMed ID: 20080212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants.
    Ferguson SJ; Langhoff JD; Voelter K; von Rechenberg B; Scharnweber D; Bierbaum S; Schnabelrauch M; Kautz AR; Frauchiger VM; Mueller TL; van Lenthe GH; Schlottig F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1037-46. PubMed ID: 19216272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Improvement of osseointegration of bio-inert ceramics by modification of the surface--results of an animal experiment].
    Schreiner U; Schroeder-Boersch H; Schwarz M; Scheller G
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2002 Jun; 47(6):164-8. PubMed ID: 12149804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.