109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23094472)
1. Company norms affect which traits are preferred in job candidates and may cause employment discrimination.
Björklund F; Backström M; Wolgast S
J Psychol; 2012; 146(6):579-94. PubMed ID: 23094472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of organizational citizenship behaviors on selection decisions in employment interviews.
Podsakoff NP; Whiting SW; Podsakoff PM; Mishra P
J Appl Psychol; 2011 Mar; 96(2):310-26. PubMed ID: 20919791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Effects of Regulatory Fit between Explanation Framing and Applicants' Regulatory Foci on Applicant Reaction.
Bian R; Lin P; Gao Q; Li J; Yang X
J Psychol; 2020; 154(2):176-198. PubMed ID: 31738655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Increasing systematicity leads to better selection decisions: Evidence from a computer paradigm for evaluating selection tools.
Bäckström M; Björklund F
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0178276. PubMed ID: 28542456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The choice between allocation principles: amplifying when equality dominates.
Eek D; Selart M
Int J Psychol; 2009 Apr; 44(2):109-19. PubMed ID: 22029452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is it better to be moral than smart? The effects of morality and competence norms on the decision to work at group status improvement.
Ellemers N; Pagliaro S; Barreto M; Leach CW
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Dec; 95(6):1397-410. PubMed ID: 19025291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sexism and beautyism effects in selection as a function of self-monitoring level of decision maker.
Jawahar IM; Mattsson J
J Appl Psychol; 2005 May; 90(3):563-73. PubMed ID: 15910150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Organizational strategy and employee outcomes: a person-organization fit perspective.
Da Silva N; Hutcheson J; Wahl GD
J Psychol; 2010; 144(2):145-61. PubMed ID: 20307020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. When do procedural fairness and outcome fairness interact to influence employees' work attitudes and behaviors? The moderating effect of uncertainty.
De Cremer D; Brockner J; Fishman A; van Dijke M; van Olffen W; Mayer DM
J Appl Psychol; 2010 Mar; 95(2):291-304. PubMed ID: 20230070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Applicants' preference for impression management tactic in employment interviews by Transportation Security Administration.
Scudder JN; Lamude KG
Psychol Rep; 2009 Apr; 104(2):403-6. PubMed ID: 19610468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Child welfare employee recruitment and retention: an organizational culture perspective.
Agbényiga DL
Child Welfare; 2009; 88(6):81-104. PubMed ID: 20695293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Communication as a mechanism for cultural integration.
Backstrom T; Hagstrom T; Goransson S
Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci; 2013 Jan; 17(1):87-105. PubMed ID: 23244751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Employment discrimination: authority figures' demographic preferences and followers' affective organizational commitment.
Petersen LE; Dietz J
J Appl Psychol; 2008 Nov; 93(6):1287-300. PubMed ID: 19025248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Justice orientation as a moderator of the framing effect on procedural justice perception.
Sasaki H; Hayashi Y
J Soc Psychol; 2014; 154(3):251-63. PubMed ID: 24873027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Age-based hiring discrimination as a function of equity norms and self-perceived objectivity.
Lindner NM; Graser A; Nosek BA
PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e84752. PubMed ID: 24465429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hospitals probe job candidates' values for organizational 'fit'.
Eubanks P
Hospitals; 1991 Oct; 65(20):36, 38. PubMed ID: 1916712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mission possible? The performance of prosocially motivated employees depends on manager trustworthiness.
Grant AM; Sumanth JJ
J Appl Psychol; 2009 Jul; 94(4):927-44. PubMed ID: 19594235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Incremental validity of person-organization fit over the Big Five personality measures.
Tsai WC; Chen HY; Chen CC
J Psychol; 2012; 146(5):485-509. PubMed ID: 22931006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Job context, selection decision outcome, and the perceived fairness of selection tests: biodata as an illustrative case.
Elkins TJ; Phillips JS
J Appl Psychol; 2000 Jun; 85(3):479-84. PubMed ID: 10900821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tools for fairness: Increased structure in the selection process reduces discrimination.
Wolgast S; Bäckström M; Björklund F
PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0189512. PubMed ID: 29228052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
