These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23094567)

  • 1. First impressions count.
    Turner JW; Moazzez R; Banerjee A
    Dent Update; 2012 Sep; 39(7):455-8, 460-2, 465-6 passim. PubMed ID: 23094567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [A new impression material for impressions of single prepared teeth destined to be covered with gold].
    Landt H
    DDZ; 1968 Jan; 22(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 4866941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fixed prosthodontics: time to change the status quo?
    Christensen GJ; Child PL
    Dent Today; 2011 Sep; 30(9):66, 68, 70-3. PubMed ID: 21980721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
    Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners.
    Abdel-Azim T; Rogers K; Elathamna E; Zandinejad A; Metz M; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 26100929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patients' preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants.
    Wismeijer D; Mans R; van Genuchten M; Reijers HA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Oct; 25(10):1113-8. PubMed ID: 23941118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Margin isolation for optical impressions and adhesion.
    Masek R
    Int J Comput Dent; 2005 Jan; 8(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 15892526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using polyvinyl impressions for study models: a case report.
    Perry R
    Dent Today; 2004 Oct; 23(10):106-7. PubMed ID: 15559460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-resolution MR imaging for dental impressions: a feasibility study.
    Boldt J; Rottner K; Schmitter M; Hopfgartner A; Jakob P; Richter EJ; Tymofiyeva O
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr; 22(3):1209-1213. PubMed ID: 28929419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impressions in implant dentistry.
    Bhakta S; Vere J; Calder I; Patel R
    Br Dent J; 2011 Oct; 211(8):361-7. PubMed ID: 22015512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A preliminary survey of impression trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations.
    Mitchell ST; Ramp MH; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):582-8. PubMed ID: 19523024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel computer-aided method to fabricate a custom one-piece glass fiber dowel-and-core based on digitized impression and crown preparation data.
    Chen Z; Li Y; Deng X; Wang X
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):276-83. PubMed ID: 24118182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N; Alikhasi M; Samadizadeh S; Beyabanaki E; Kharazifard MJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Precision impressions for inlays, crowns, and bridge work. An easy and reliable method for single or multiple preparations.
    Norton HD
    Br Dent J; 1967 Nov; 123(10):493-4. PubMed ID: 4863320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benefits of the dual-arch impression technique. Accurate impressions and fewer than 1% remakes.
    Abrams SH
    Dent Today; 2002 Jul; 21(7):56-9. PubMed ID: 12242834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods.
    Cho SH; Schaefer O; Thompson GA; Guentsch A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 25682531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A NEW APPROACH TO IMPRESSION TAKING FOR CROWN AND BRIDGE.
    CANNISTRACI AJ
    Dent Clin North Am; 1965 Mar; 29():33-42. PubMed ID: 14278956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technique and materials for obtaining accurate impressions in 60 to 90 seconds.
    Werrin SR
    Dent Today; 2003 Mar; 22(3):86-9. PubMed ID: 12705017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.