These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23095325)
1. Fitting parametric random effects models in very large data sets with application to VHA national data. Gebregziabher M; Egede L; Gilbert GE; Hunt K; Nietert PJ; Mauldin P BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Oct; 12():163. PubMed ID: 23095325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Logistic random effects regression models: a comparison of statistical packages for binary and ordinal outcomes. Li B; Lingsma HF; Steyerberg EW; Lesaffre E BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 May; 11():77. PubMed ID: 21605357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution]. Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B; Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sample size and power calculations based on generalized linear mixed models with correlated binary outcomes. Dang Q; Mazumdar S; Houck PR Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Aug; 91(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 18462826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeated Measures Designs and Analysis of Longitudinal Data: If at First You Do Not Succeed-Try, Try Again. Schober P; Vetter TR Anesth Analg; 2018 Aug; 127(2):569-575. PubMed ID: 29905618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes. Westgate PM Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On fitting generalized linear mixed-effects models for binary responses using different statistical packages. Zhang H; Lu N; Feng C; Thurston SW; Xia Y; Zhu L; Tu XM Stat Med; 2011 Sep; 30(20):2562-72. PubMed ID: 21671252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies. Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with SAS PROC GLIMMIX. Menke J Methods Inf Med; 2010; 49(1):54-62, 62-4. PubMed ID: 19936437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Parameter estimation in longitudinal studies with outcome-dependent follow-up. Lipsitz SR; Fitzmaurice GM; Ibrahim JG; Gelber R; Lipshultz S Biometrics; 2002 Sep; 58(3):621-30. PubMed ID: 12229997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does pattern mixture modelling reduce bias due to informative attrition compared to fitting a mixed effects model to the available cases or data imputed using multiple imputation?: a simulation study. Welch CA; Sabia S; Brunner E; Kivimäki M; Shipley MJ BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):89. PubMed ID: 30157752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Geographic Variation in Rosiglitazone Use Surrounding FDA Warnings in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Ahuja V; Sohn MW; Birge JR; Syverson C; Budiman-Mak E; Emanuele N; Cooper JM; Huang ES J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2015 Dec; 21(12):1214-34. PubMed ID: 26679970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Evaluation of Bivariate Mixed Models in Meta-analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies with SAS, Stata and R. Vogelgesang F; Schlattmann P; Dewey M Methods Inf Med; 2018 May; 57(3):111-119. PubMed ID: 29719917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Logistic Regression with Multiple Random Effects: A Simulation Study of Estimation Methods and Statistical Packages. Kim Y; Choi YK; Emery S Am Stat; 2013 Aug; 67(3):. PubMed ID: 24288415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of multiple imputation methods for missing data in longitudinal studies. Huque MH; Carlin JB; Simpson JA; Lee KJ BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):168. PubMed ID: 30541455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computational issues in fitting joint frailty models for recurrent events with an associated terminal event. Toenges G; Jahn-Eimermacher A Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 May; 188():105259. PubMed ID: 31862679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mapping clinical outcomes to generic preference-based outcome measures: development and comparison of methods. Hernández Alava M; Wailoo A; Pudney S; Gray L; Manca A Health Technol Assess; 2020 Jun; 24(34):1-68. PubMed ID: 32613941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Linear mixed-effects modeling approach to FMRI group analysis. Chen G; Saad ZS; Britton JC; Pine DS; Cox RW Neuroimage; 2013 Jun; 73():176-90. PubMed ID: 23376789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reference effect measures for quantifying, comparing and visualizing variation from random and fixed effects in non-normal multilevel models, with applications to site variation in medical procedure use and outcomes. Glorioso TJ; Grunwald GK; Ho PM; Maddox TM BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jul; 18(1):74. PubMed ID: 29980180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups. Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]