195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23095461)
1. Does the variable-stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier? A meta-analysis of the efficacy of the variable stiffness colonoscope compared with the standard adult colonoscope.
Xie Q; Chen B; Liu L; Gan H
BMC Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 12():151. PubMed ID: 23095461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variable stiffness colonoscope versus regular adult colonoscope: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Othman MO; Bradley AG; Choudhary A; Hoffman RM; Roy PK
Endoscopy; 2009 Jan; 41(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 19160154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective trial of variable stiffness pediatric vs. standard instrument colonoscopy.
Kaffes AJ; Mishra A; Ding SL; Hope R; Williams SJ; Gillespie PE; Bourke MJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Nov; 58(5):685-9. PubMed ID: 14595301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variable stiffness colonoscopes are associated with less pain during colonoscopy in unsedated patients.
Yoshikawa I; Honda H; Nagata K; Kanda K; Yamasaki T; Kume K; Tabaru A; Otsuki M
Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Dec; 97(12):3052-5. PubMed ID: 12492189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized controlled trial of comparison on time and rate of cecal and termianl Ileal intubation according to adult-colonoscope length: intermediate versus long.
Kim KM; Lee SH; Lee DJ; Kim KN; Seo SW; Lee HS; Lee DR
J Korean Med Sci; 2014 Jan; 29(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 24431912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope decreases the dose of patient-controlled sedation during colonoscopy: a randomized comparison of 3 colonoscopes.
Lee DW; Li AC; Ko CW; Chu DW; Chan KC; Poon CM; Sin KS; Leung KF; Sze TS; Chan AC; Chung SC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Mar; 65(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 17321243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic endoscopic imaging vs standard colonoscopy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Chen Y; Duan YT; Xie Q; Qin XP; Chen B; Xia L; Zhou Y; Li NN; Wu XT
World J Gastroenterol; 2013 Nov; 19(41):7197-204. PubMed ID: 24222966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of variable stiffness colonoscopes on cecal intubation times for routine colonoscopy by an experienced examiner in sedated patients.
Rex DK
Endoscopy; 2001 Jan; 33(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 11204989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrathin colonoscope with a diameter of 9.8 mm for total colonoscopy.
Okamoto M; Kawabe T; Kato J; Yamaji Y; Ikenoue T; Omata M
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2005 Sep; 39(8):679-83. PubMed ID: 16082276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta-analysis of the performance of ultrathin vs. standard colonoscopes.
Sofi AA; Nawras A; Khan MA; Howden CW; Lee WM
Endoscopy; 2017 Apr; 49(4):351-358. PubMed ID: 27852099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of a proprietary intraluminal stiffening wire device on cecal intubation time and rate with used colonoscopes; a randomized, controlled trial.
East JM
BMC Res Notes; 2013 Feb; 6():48. PubMed ID: 23379922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long pediatric colonoscope versus intermediate length adult colonoscope for colonoscopy.
Hsieh YH; Zhou AL; Lin HJ
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jul; 23(7 Pt 2):e7-e10. PubMed ID: 18702687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized controlled trial in a training institution comparing a pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope, a pediatric colonoscope, and an adult colonoscope.
Shumaker DA; Zaman A; Katon RM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Feb; 55(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 11818918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Propofol sedation for colonoscopy with a new ultrathin or a standard endoscope: a prospective randomized controlled study.
Töx U; Schumacher B; Toermer T; Terheggen G; Mertens J; Holzapfel B; Lehmacher W; Goeser T; Neuhaus H
Endoscopy; 2013 Jun; 45(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 23468196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in polyp detection and cecal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Ng SC; Tsoi KK; Hirai HW; Lee YT; Wu JC; Sung JJ; Chan FK; Lau JY
Am J Gastroenterol; 2012 Aug; 107(8):1165-73. PubMed ID: 22664471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does the use of a variable stiffness colonoscope offer advantages during colonoscopy under deep sedation? Results of a randomized trial.
Sola-Vera J; Uceda F; Brotons A; Sáez J; Girona E; Pérez E; Picó MD; Grau C; Sillero C
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Jul; 23(7):593-7. PubMed ID: 21593674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The variable stiffness colonoscope: assessment of efficacy by magnetic endoscope imaging.
Shah SG; Brooker JC; Williams CB; Thapar C; Suzuki N; Saunders BP
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Aug; 56(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 12145596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope allows completion of colonoscopy after failure with the standard adult colonoscope.
Shumaker DA; Zaman A; Katon RM
Endoscopy; 2002 Sep; 34(9):711-4. PubMed ID: 12195328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative study of a responsive insertion technology (RIT) colonoscope versus a variable-stiffness colonoscope.
Prieto-de-Frías C; Muñoz-Navas M; Carretero C; Carrascosa J; Betés MT; de-la-Riva S; Herraiz MT; Súbtil JC
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2013 Apr; 105(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 23859449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Usefulness of a small-caliber, variable-stiffness colonoscope as a backup in patients with difficult or incomplete colonoscopy.
Horiuchi A; Nakayama Y; Kajiyama M; Fujii H; Tanaka N
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Oct; 99(10):1936-40. PubMed ID: 15447752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
