These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
505 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23095628)
21. Protective Loop Ileostomy Closure Techniques: Comparison of Three Different Surgical Techniques. Celayir MF; Tanal M; Besler E; Koksal H Cureus; 2020 Oct; 12(10):e10977. PubMed ID: 33094038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reversal of loop ileostomy under an Enhanced Recovery Programme - Is the stapled anastomosis technique still better than the handsewn technique? Markides GA; Wijetunga I; McMahon M; Gupta P; Subramanian A; Anwar S Int J Surg; 2015 Nov; 23(Pt A):41-5. PubMed ID: 26403069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Complications of loop ileostomy closure in patients with rectal tumor. Akiyoshi T; Fujimoto Y; Konishi T; Kuroyanagi H; Ueno M; Oya M; Yamaguchi T World J Surg; 2010 Aug; 34(8):1937-42. PubMed ID: 20372898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Techniques and complications of ileostomy takedown. Phang PT; Hain JM; Perez-Ramirez JJ; Madoff RD; Gemlo BT Am J Surg; 1999 Jun; 177(6):463-6. PubMed ID: 10414694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Study protocol evaluating the use of bowel stimulation before loop ileostomy closure to reduce postoperative ileus: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Garfinkle R; Trabulsi N; Morin N; Phang T; Liberman S; Feldman L; Fried G; Boutros M Colorectal Dis; 2017 Nov; 19(11):1024-1029. PubMed ID: 28498636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Acceptable results of early closure of loop ileostomy to protect low rectal anastomosis. Perdawid SK; Andersen OB Dan Med Bull; 2011 Jun; 58(6):A4280. PubMed ID: 21651876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Defunctioning loop ileostomy for pelvic anastomoses: predictors of morbidity and nonclosure. Chun LJ; Haigh PI; Tam MS; Abbas MA Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Feb; 55(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 22228160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Stimulation of the efferent limb before ileostomy closure: a randomized clinical trial. Abrisqueta J; Abellan I; Luján J; Hernández Q; Parrilla P Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Dec; 57(12):1391-6. PubMed ID: 25380005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Traditional lateral ileostomy versus percutaneous ileostomy by exclusion probe for the protection of extraperitoneal colo-rectal anastomosis: the ALPPI (Anastomotic Leak Prevention by Probe Ileostomy) trial. A randomized controlled trial. Bugiantella W; Rondelli F; Mariani L; Boni M; Tassi A; Stella P; Patiti M; Ermili F; Avenia N; Mariani E Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Apr; 40(4):476-83. PubMed ID: 24491287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Randomized clinical trial of short-term outcomes following purse-string versus conventional closure of ileostomy wounds. Reid K; Pockney P; Pollitt T; Draganic B; Smith SR Br J Surg; 2010 Oct; 97(10):1511-7. PubMed ID: 20575111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Ileostomy closure in a colorectal surgery unit. Comparative analysis of different techniques]. Vallribera Valls F; Villanueva Figueredo B; Jiménez Gómez LM; Espín Bassany E; Sánchez Martinez JL; Martí Gallostra M; Armengol Carrasco M Cir Esp; 2014 Mar; 92(3):182-7. PubMed ID: 24412284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Defunctioning cannula ileostomy after lower anterior resection of rectal cancer. Hua H; Xu J; Chen W; Zhou X; Wang J; Sheng Q; Lin J Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Nov; 57(11):1267-74. PubMed ID: 25285693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Infraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis: hand-sewn versus circular staples. A controlled clinical trial. French Associations for Surgical Research. Fingerhut A; Elhadad A; Hay JM; Lacaine F; Flamant Y Surgery; 1994 Sep; 116(3):484-90. PubMed ID: 8079178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Randomized controlled trial: comparison of two surgical techniques for closing the wound following ileostomy closure: purse string vs direct suture. Dusch N; Goranova D; Herrle F; Niedergethmann M; Kienle P Colorectal Dis; 2013 Aug; 15(8):1033-40. PubMed ID: 23634717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis with a double stapling technique. Kim JS; Cho SY; Min BS; Kim NK J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Dec; 209(6):694-701. PubMed ID: 19959036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Rectal cancer surgery with or without bowel preparation: The French GRECCAR III multicenter single-blinded randomized trial. Bretagnol F; Panis Y; Rullier E; Rouanet P; Berdah S; Dousset B; Portier G; Benoist S; Chipponi J; Vicaut E; Ann Surg; 2010 Nov; 252(5):863-8. PubMed ID: 21037443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hsu HH; Chen JS; Huang PM; Lee JM; Lee YC Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 25(6):1097-101. PubMed ID: 15145015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Defunctioning loop ileostomy and stapled side-to-side closure has low morbidity. Amin SN; Memon MA; Armitage NC; Scholefield JH Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2001 Jul; 83(4):246-9. PubMed ID: 11518371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomoses during rectal cancer surgery. Rullier E; Le Toux N; Laurent C; Garrelon JL; Parneix M; Saric J World J Surg; 2001 Mar; 25(3):274-7; discussion 277-8. PubMed ID: 11343175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]