204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23095859)
1. MUMAL: multivariate analysis in shotgun proteomics using machine learning techniques.
Cerqueira FR; Ferreira RS; Oliveira AP; Gomes AP; Ramos HJ; Graber A; Baumgartner C
BMC Genomics; 2012; 13 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S4. PubMed ID: 23095859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MUMAL2: Improving sensitivity in shotgun proteomics using cost sensitive artificial neural networks and a threshold selector algorithm.
Cerqueira FR; Ricardo AM; de Paiva Oliveira A; Graber A; Baumgartner C
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(Suppl 18):472. PubMed ID: 28105913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MUDE: a new approach for optimizing sensitivity in the target-decoy search strategy for large-scale peptide/protein identification.
Cerqueira FR; Graber A; Schwikowski B; Baumgartner C
J Proteome Res; 2010 May; 9(5):2265-77. PubMed ID: 20199108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Decoy methods for assessing false positives and false discovery rates in shotgun proteomics.
Wang G; Wu WW; Zhang Z; Masilamani S; Shen RF
Anal Chem; 2009 Jan; 81(1):146-59. PubMed ID: 19061407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improvements to the percolator algorithm for Peptide identification from shotgun proteomics data sets.
Spivak M; Weston J; Bottou L; Käll L; Noble WS
J Proteome Res; 2009 Jul; 8(7):3737-45. PubMed ID: 19385687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two-dimensional target decoy strategy for shotgun proteomics.
Bern MW; Kil YJ
J Proteome Res; 2011 Dec; 10(12):5296-301. PubMed ID: 22010998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A cost-sensitive online learning method for peptide identification.
Liang X; Xia Z; Jian L; Wang Y; Niu X; Link AJ
BMC Genomics; 2020 Apr; 21(1):324. PubMed ID: 32334531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A peptide-retrieval strategy enables significant improvement of quantitative performance without compromising confidence of identification.
Tu C; Shen S; Sheng Q; Shyr Y; Qu J
J Proteomics; 2017 Jan; 152():276-282. PubMed ID: 27903464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. AttnPep: A Self-Attention-Based Deep Learning Method for Peptide Identification in Shotgun Proteomics.
Li Y; He Q; Guo H; Shuai SC; Cheng J; Liu L; Shuai J
J Proteome Res; 2024 Feb; 23(2):834-843. PubMed ID: 38252705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New mixture models for decoy-free false discovery rate estimation in mass spectrometry proteomics.
Peng Y; Jain S; Li YF; Greguš M; Ivanov AR; Vitek O; Radivojac P
Bioinformatics; 2020 Dec; 36(Suppl_2):i745-i753. PubMed ID: 33381824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Common Decoy Distributions Simplify False Discovery Rate Estimation in Shotgun Proteomics.
Madej D; Wu L; Lam H
J Proteome Res; 2022 Feb; 21(2):339-348. PubMed ID: 34989576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Statistical learning of peptide retention behavior in chromatographic separations: a new kernel-based approach for computational proteomics.
Pfeifer N; Leinenbach A; Huber CG; Kohlbacher O
BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Nov; 8():468. PubMed ID: 18053132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. APP: an Automated Proteomics Pipeline for the analysis of mass spectrometry data based on multiple open access tools.
Malm EK; Srivastava V; Sundqvist G; Bulone V
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Dec; 15(1):441. PubMed ID: 25547515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. JUMP: a tag-based database search tool for peptide identification with high sensitivity and accuracy.
Wang X; Li Y; Wu Z; Wang H; Tan H; Peng J
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2014 Dec; 13(12):3663-73. PubMed ID: 25202125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets.
Käll L; Canterbury JD; Weston J; Noble WS; MacCoss MJ
Nat Methods; 2007 Nov; 4(11):923-5. PubMed ID: 17952086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved False Discovery Rate Estimation Procedure for Shotgun Proteomics.
Keich U; Kertesz-Farkas A; Noble WS
J Proteome Res; 2015 Aug; 14(8):3148-61. PubMed ID: 26152888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Challenges in Peptide-Spectrum Matching: A Robust and Reproducible Statistical Framework for Removing Low-Accuracy, High-Scoring Hits.
Hubler SL; Kumar P; Mehta S; Easterly C; Johnson JE; Jagtap PD; Griffin TJ
J Proteome Res; 2020 Jan; 19(1):161-173. PubMed ID: 31793300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Empirical multidimensional space for scoring peptide spectrum matches in shotgun proteomics.
Ivanov MV; Levitsky LI; Lobas AA; Panic T; Laskay ÜA; Mitulovic G; Schmid R; Pridatchenko ML; Tsybin YO; Gorshkov MV
J Proteome Res; 2014 Apr; 13(4):1911-20. PubMed ID: 24571493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhanced peptide identification by electron transfer dissociation using an improved Mascot Percolator.
Wright JC; Collins MO; Yu L; Käll L; Brosch M; Choudhary JS
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2012 Aug; 11(8):478-91. PubMed ID: 22493177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. pValid 2: A deep learning based validation method for peptide identification in shotgun proteomics with increased discriminating power.
Zhou WJ; Wei ZH; He SM; Chi H
J Proteomics; 2022 Jan; 251():104414. PubMed ID: 34737111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
