204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23095859)
21. Peptide reranking with protein-peptide correspondence and precursor peak intensity information.
Yang C; He Z; Yang C; Yu W
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(4):1212-9. PubMed ID: 22350209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Tandem Mass Spectrum Sequencing: An Alternative to Database Search Engines in Shotgun Proteomics.
Muth T; Rapp E; Berven FS; Barsnes H; Vaudel M
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 919():217-226. PubMed ID: 27975219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Modeling Lower-Order Statistics to Enable Decoy-Free FDR Estimation in Proteomics.
Madej D; Lam H
J Proteome Res; 2023 Apr; 22(4):1159-1171. PubMed ID: 36962508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Improving X!Tandem on peptide identification from mass spectrometry by self-boosted Percolator.
Yang P; Ma J; Wang P; Zhu Y; Zhou BB; Yang YH
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(5):1273-80. PubMed ID: 22689082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An adaptive classification model for peptide identification.
Liang X; Xia Z; Jian L; Niu X; Link A
BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 11(Suppl 11):S1. PubMed ID: 26578406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Score regularization for peptide identification.
He Z; Zhao H; Yu W
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Feb; 12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S2. PubMed ID: 21342549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A ranking-based scoring function for peptide-spectrum matches.
Frank AM
J Proteome Res; 2009 May; 8(5):2241-52. PubMed ID: 19231891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A decoy-free approach to the identification of peptides.
Gonnelli G; Stock M; Verwaeren J; Maddelein D; De Baets B; Martens L; Degroeve S
J Proteome Res; 2015 Apr; 14(4):1792-8. PubMed ID: 25714903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A cross-validation scheme for machine learning algorithms in shotgun proteomics.
Granholm V; Noble WS; Käll L
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012; 13 Suppl 16(Suppl 16):S3. PubMed ID: 23176259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. TIDD: tool-independent and data-dependent machine learning for peptide identification.
Li H; Na S; Hwang KB; Paek E
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Mar; 23(1):109. PubMed ID: 35354356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Shape-based feature matching improves protein identification via LC-MS and tandem MS.
Noy K; Towfic F; Wittenberg GM; Fasulo D
J Comput Biol; 2011 Apr; 18(4):547-57. PubMed ID: 21417940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Learning score function parameters for improved spectrum identification in tandem mass spectrometry experiments.
Spivak M; Bereman MS; Maccoss MJ; Noble WS
J Proteome Res; 2012 Sep; 11(9):4499-508. PubMed ID: 22866926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Quality assessment of tandem mass spectra using support vector machine (SVM).
Zou AM; Wu FX; Ding JR; Poirier GG
BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S49. PubMed ID: 19208151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. YPED: an integrated bioinformatics suite and database for mass spectrometry-based proteomics research.
Colangelo CM; Shifman M; Cheung KH; Stone KL; Carriero NJ; Gulcicek EE; Lam TT; Wu T; Bjornson RD; Bruce C; Nairn AC; Rinehart J; Miller PL; Williams KR
Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 13(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 25712262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Constructing a Tandem Mass Spectral Library for Forensic Ricin Identification.
O'Bryon I; Tucker AE; Kaiser BLD; Wahl KL; Merkley ED
J Proteome Res; 2019 Nov; 18(11):3926-3935. PubMed ID: 31566388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Transfer posterior error probability estimation for peptide identification.
Yi X; Gong F; Fu Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 May; 21(1):173. PubMed ID: 32366221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluating de novo sequencing in proteomics: already an accurate alternative to database-driven peptide identification?
Muth T; Renard BY
Brief Bioinform; 2018 Sep; 19(5):954-970. PubMed ID: 28369237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. In-depth analysis of protein inference algorithms using multiple search engines and well-defined metrics.
Audain E; Uszkoreit J; Sachsenberg T; Pfeuffer J; Liang X; Hermjakob H; Sanchez A; Eisenacher M; Reinert K; Tabb DL; Kohlbacher O; Perez-Riverol Y
J Proteomics; 2017 Jan; 150():170-182. PubMed ID: 27498275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Research progress and application of retention time prediction method based on deep learning].
DU Z; Shao W; Qin W
Se Pu; 2021 Mar; 39(3):211-218. PubMed ID: 34227303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Accurate Identification of Deamidation and Citrullination from Global Shotgun Proteomics Data Using a Dual-Search Delta Score Strategy.
Wang X; Swensen AC; Zhang T; Piehowski PD; Gaffrey MJ; Monroe ME; Zhu Y; Dong H; Qian WJ
J Proteome Res; 2020 Apr; 19(4):1863-1872. PubMed ID: 32175737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
