BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23096119)

  • 1. Developing a multi-joint upper limb exoskeleton robot for diagnosis, therapy, and outcome evaluation in neurorehabilitation.
    Ren Y; Kang SH; Park HS; Wu YN; Zhang LQ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2013 May; 21(3):490-9. PubMed ID: 23096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation: a robot for wrist rehabilitation.
    Krebs HI; Volpe BT; Williams D; Celestino J; Charles SK; Lynch D; Hogan N
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Sep; 15(3):327-35. PubMed ID: 17894265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assistive Control System for Upper Limb Rehabilitation Robot.
    Chen SH; Lien WM; Wang WW; Lee GD; Hsu LC; Lee KW; Lin SY; Lin CH; Fu LC; Lai JS; Luh JJ; Chen WS
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 Nov; 24(11):1199-1209. PubMed ID: 26929055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of electromechanical wrist robot assistive system with neuromuscular electrical stimulation for stroke rehabilitation.
    Hu XL; Tong KY; Li R; Xue JJ; Ho SK; Chen P
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2012 Jun; 22(3):431-9. PubMed ID: 22277205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of EMG signals for controlling exoskeleton robots.
    Fleischer C; Wege A; Kondak K; Hommel G
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2006 Dec; 51(5-6):314-9. PubMed ID: 17155866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Redundancy resolution of the human arm and an upper limb exoskeleton.
    Kim H; Miller LM; Byl N; Abrams GM; Rosen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Jun; 59(6):1770-9. PubMed ID: 22510944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experiments and kinematics analysis of a hand rehabilitation exoskeleton with circuitous joints.
    Zhang F; Fu Y; Zhang Q; Wang S
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S665-72. PubMed ID: 26406062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Kinematic design to improve ergonomics in human machine interaction.
    Schiele A; van der Helm FC
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2006 Dec; 14(4):456-69. PubMed ID: 17190037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Design of a 6-DOF upper limb rehabilitation exoskeleton with parallel actuated joints.
    Chen Y; Li G; Zhu Y; Zhao J; Cai H
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):2527-35. PubMed ID: 25226954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robot-assisted humanized passive rehabilitation training based on online assessment and regulation.
    Pan L; Song A; Duan S; Xu B
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S655-64. PubMed ID: 26406061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of post-stroke upper-limb training with an electromyography (EMG)-driven hand robot.
    Hu XL; Tong KY; Wei XJ; Rong W; Susanto EA; Ho SK
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2013 Oct; 23(5):1065-74. PubMed ID: 23932795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Standing-up robot: an assistive rehabilitative device for training and assessment.
    Kamnik R; Bajd T
    J Med Eng Technol; 2004; 28(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 14965861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gravity compensation of an upper extremity exoskeleton.
    Moubarak S; Pham MT; Moreau R; Redarce T
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():4489-93. PubMed ID: 21095778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantifying anti-gravity torques for the design of a powered exoskeleton.
    Ragonesi D; Agrawal SK; Sample W; Rahman T
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2013 Mar; 21(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 23096118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptive control of 5 DOF upper-limb exoskeleton robot with improved safety.
    Kang HB; Wang JH
    ISA Trans; 2013 Nov; 52(6):844-52. PubMed ID: 23906739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A mechatronic device for the rehabilitation of ankle motor function.
    Bucca G; Bezzolato A; Bruni S; Molteni F
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Dec; 131(12):125001. PubMed ID: 20524738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients.
    Colombo R; Pisano F; Micera S; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Carrozza MC; Dario P; Minuco G
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Sep; 13(3):311-24. PubMed ID: 16200755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Elbow functional compensation using a lightweight magnetorheological clutch.
    Clemente AM; Caballero AF; Rojas DB; Copaci DS; Lorente LM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():5215-8. PubMed ID: 22255513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A proof of concept study investigating the feasibility of combining iPAM robot assisted rehabilitation with functional electrical stimulation to deliver whole arm exercise in stroke survivors.
    O'Connor RJ; Jackson A; Makower SG; Cozens A; Levesley M
    J Med Eng Technol; 2014; 39(7):411-8. PubMed ID: 26414146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving the ROM of wrist movements in stroke patients by means of a haptic wrist robot.
    Squeri V; Masia L; Taverna L; Morasso P
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():1268-71. PubMed ID: 22254547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.