These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23098268)

  • 1. On avoiding framing effects in experienced decision makers.
    Garcia-Retamero R; Dhami MK
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(4):829-42. PubMed ID: 23098268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Framing effect debiasing in medical decision making.
    Almashat S; Ayotte B; Edelstein B; Margrett J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Apr; 71(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 18164168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Framing effects and risk-sensitive decision making.
    Mishra S; Gregson M; Lalumière ML
    Br J Psychol; 2012 Feb; 103(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 22229776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Communicating global cardiovascular risk: are icon arrays better than numerical estimates in improving understanding, recall and perception of risk?
    Ruiz JG; Andrade AD; Garcia-Retamero R; Anam R; Rodriguez R; Sharit J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Dec; 93(3):394-402. PubMed ID: 23916416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Moderating the interaction between procedural justice and decision frame: the counterbalancing effect of personality traits.
    Sasaki H; Hayashi Y
    J Psychol; 2013; 147(2):125-51. PubMed ID: 23469475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Beyond gains and losses: the effect of need on risky choice in framed decisions.
    Mishra S; Fiddick L
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Jun; 102(6):1136-47. PubMed ID: 22486678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risky decision making across three arenas of choice: are younger and older adults differently susceptible to framing effects?
    Rönnlund M; Karlsson E; Laggnäs E; Larsson L; Lindström T
    J Gen Psychol; 2005 Jan; 132(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 15685961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Police decision making in sexual assault cases: predictors of suspect identification and arrest.
    Tasca M; Rodriguez N; Spohn C; Koss MP
    J Interpers Violence; 2013 Apr; 28(6):1157-77. PubMed ID: 23248354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors influencing risky decision-making in patients with cerebral infarction.
    Gong J; Zhang Y; Wu B; Feng J; Zhang W; Wang S; Huang Y; Wu X
    Psychol Health Med; 2015; 20(4):410-8. PubMed ID: 25220685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Framing effects in group investment decision making: role of group polarization.
    Cheng PY; Chiou WB
    Psychol Rep; 2008 Feb; 102(1):283-92. PubMed ID: 18481688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frames, decisions, and cardiac-autonomic control.
    Sütterlin S; Herbert C; Schmitt M; Kübler A; Vögele C
    Soc Neurosci; 2011; 6(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 20661838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unsafe sex: decision-making biases and heuristics.
    Kaplan BJ; Shayne VT
    AIDS Educ Prev; 1993; 5(4):294-301. PubMed ID: 8297709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating investigators: examining the impact of eyewitness identification evidence on student-investigators.
    Boyce MA; Lindsay DS; Brimacombe CA
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Oct; 32(5):439-53. PubMed ID: 18060486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shoot or don't shoot? Why police officers are more inclined to shoot when they are anxious.
    Nieuwenhuys A; Savelsbergh GJ; Oudejans RR
    Emotion; 2012 Aug; 12(4):827-33. PubMed ID: 22023363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Believing is seeing? Investigating the perceived accuracy of criminal psychological profiles.
    Kocsis RN; Hayes AF
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2004 Apr; 48(2):149-60. PubMed ID: 15070463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of a mass media campaign on personal risk perception, perceived self-efficacy and on other behavioural predictors.
    Agha S
    AIDS Care; 2003 Dec; 15(6):749-62. PubMed ID: 14617497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preliminary evidence of effects of crisis intervention team training on self-efficacy and social distance.
    Bahora M; Hanafi S; Chien VH; Compton MT
    Adm Policy Ment Health; 2008 May; 35(3):159-67. PubMed ID: 18040771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What makes adults with hearing impairment take up hearing AIDS or communication programs and achieve successful outcomes?
    Laplante-Lévesque A; Hickson L; Worrall L
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 21841487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Positive emotional context eliminates the framing effect in decision-making.
    Cassotti M; Habib M; Poirel N; Aïte A; Houdé O; Moutier S
    Emotion; 2012 Oct; 12(5):926-31. PubMed ID: 22309727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gender difference or indifference? Detective decision making in sexual assault cases.
    Alderden MA; Ullman SE
    J Interpers Violence; 2012 Jan; 27(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 21810790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.