BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

484 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23098630)

  • 1. Comparison of visual results with accommodating intraocular lenses versus mini-monovision with a monofocal intraocular lens.
    Beiko GHH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jan; 39(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 23098630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of near vision, intraocular lens movement, and depth of focus with accommodating and monofocal intraocular lenses.
    Dhital A; Spalton DJ; Gala KB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1872-8. PubMed ID: 24427795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing visual function of accommodating IOLs versus mini-monovision with a nonaccommodating monofocal IOL.
    Pepose JS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):969-70. PubMed ID: 23688902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reply: comparing visual function of accommodating IOLs versus mini-monovision with a nonaccommodating monofocal IOL.
    Beiko G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):970. PubMed ID: 23688903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Objective accommodation measurement of the Crystalens HD compared to monofocal intraocular lenses.
    Zamora-Alejo KV; Moore SP; Parker DG; Ullrich K; Esterman A; Goggin M
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Feb; 29(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 23380415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Near visual outcomes with single-optic and dual-optic accommodating intraocular lenses.
    Alió JL; Plaza-Puche AB; Montalban R; Ortega P
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1568-75. PubMed ID: 22906443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual outcomes with a single-optic accommodating intraocular lens and a low-addition-power rotational asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens.
    Alió JL; Plaza-Puche AB; Montalban R; Javaloy J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):978-85. PubMed ID: 22624896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in contrast sensitivity between monofocal, multifocal and accommodating intraocular lenses: long-term results.
    Mesci C; Erbil HH; Olgun A; Aydin N; Candemir B; Akçakaya AA
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Nov; 38(8):768-77. PubMed ID: 20572819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. First results with a new intraocular lens design for the individual correction of spherical aberration.
    Schrecker J; Langenbucher A; Seitz B; Eppig T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1211-1219. PubMed ID: 30120004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized trial of multifocal intraocular lenses versus monovision after bilateral cataract surgery.
    Wilkins MR; Allan BD; Rubin GS; Findl O; Hollick EJ; Bunce C; Xing W;
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Dec; 120(12):2449-2455.e1. PubMed ID: 24070808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual outcomes after accommodating intraocular lens implantation.
    Macsai MS; Padnick-Silver L; Fontes BM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Apr; 32(4):628-33. PubMed ID: 16698485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing visual acuity, range of vision and spectacle independence in the extended range of vision and monofocal intraocular lens.
    Hogarty DT; Russell DJ; Ward BM; Dewhurst N; Burt P
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 46(8):854-860. PubMed ID: 29726108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of the Crystalens AT-45 accommodating intraocular lens: results of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trial.
    Cumming JS; Colvard DM; Dell SJ; Doane J; Fine IH; Hoffman RS; Packer M; Slade SG
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 May; 32(5):812-25. PubMed ID: 16765800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual performance comparison of 2 extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses.
    Schojai M; Schultz T; Jerke C; Böcker J; Dick HB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Mar; 46(3):388-393. PubMed ID: 32142039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraindividual comparison of aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses of same material and platform.
    Ohtani S; Miyata K; Samejima T; Honbou M; Oshika T
    Ophthalmology; 2009 May; 116(5):896-901. PubMed ID: 19410948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Synchrony dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens. Part 2: pilot clinical evaluation.
    Ossma IL; Galvis A; Vargas LG; Trager MJ; Vagefi MR; McLeod SD
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jan; 33(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 17189792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes after bilateral implantation of toric intraocular lenses with or without a multifocal component.
    Hayashi K; Masumoto M; Takimoto M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Jan; 41(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 25466485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual outcome, optical quality, and patient satisfaction with a new monofocal IOL, enhanced for intermediate vision: preliminary results.
    Mencucci R; Cennamo M; Venturi D; Vignapiano R; Favuzza E
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Mar; 46(3):378-387. PubMed ID: 32050218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of visual performances of enhanced monofocal versus standard monofocal IOLs in a mini-monovision approach.
    Beltraminelli T; Rizzato A; Toniolo K; Galli A; Menghini M
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Apr; 23(1):170. PubMed ID: 37085852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pseudophakic monovision using monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses: hybrid monovision.
    Iida Y; Shimizu K; Ito M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Nov; 37(11):2001-5. PubMed ID: 22018364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.