These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23100148)

  • 1. The Durom acetabular component. a concise follow-up of early revision rates at a minimum of 2 years.
    Hutt J; Dodd M; Briffa N; Bourke H; Hazlerigg A; Ward D
    Hip Int; 2012; 22(5):562-5. PubMed ID: 23100148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Complications Are Not Increased With Acetabular Revision of Metal-on-metal Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Penrose CT; Seyler TM; Wellman SS; Bolognesi MP; Lachiewicz PF
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2134-42. PubMed ID: 26987866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncemented jumbo cups for revision total hip arthroplasty: a concise follow-up, at a mean of twenty years, of a previous report.
    von Roth P; Abdel MP; Harmsen WS; Berry DJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(4):284-7. PubMed ID: 25695978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 23515989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.
    Wong JM; Liu YL; Graves S; de Steiger R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3458-64. PubMed ID: 25721576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The medium term outcome of the Omnifit constrained acetabular cup.
    Bigsby E; Whitehouse MR; Bannister GC; Blom AW
    Hip Int; 2012; 22(5):505-10. PubMed ID: 23100150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative long-term survivorship of uncemented acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Kremers HM; Howard JL; Loechler Y; Schleck CD; Harmsen WS; Berry DJ; Cabanela ME; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW; Trousdale RT; Lewallen DG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):e82. PubMed ID: 22717834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perspectives in managing an implant recall: revision of 94 Durom Metasul acetabular components.
    Ng VY; Arnott L; McShane MA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Sep; 93(17):e100(1-5). PubMed ID: 21915553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Exeter Contemporary flanged cemented acetabular component in primary total hip arthroplasty.
    Maggs JL; Smeatham A; Whitehouse SL; Charity J; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
    Bone Joint J; 2016 Mar; 98-B(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 26920954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Revision of the acetabulum with a contemporary cementless component.
    Wysocki RW; Della Valle CJ; Shott S; Rosenberg AG; Berger RA; Galante JO
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):58-63. PubMed ID: 19282138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Total Hip Arthroplasty After Acetabular Fracture Is Associated With Lower Survivorship and More Complications.
    Morison Z; Moojen DJ; Nauth A; Hall J; McKee MD; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):392-8. PubMed ID: 26335343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The midterm and long-term effects of acetabular roof ring and Burch-Schneider anti-protusio cages in acetabular revisions for patients with acetabular bone deficiency.
    Demir MT; Pirinççi Y; Salih M; Erdoğan F; Güney N
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2015; 49(6):597-605. PubMed ID: 26511685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Five-year results of the ASR XL Acetabular System and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    de Steiger RN; Hang JR; Miller LN; Graves SE; Davidson DC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93(24):2287-93. PubMed ID: 22258775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Re-revision of failed revision Total Hip Arthroplasty acetabular components.
    Lim SJ; Lee YS; Lim BH; Park YS
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2014 Sep; 80(3):357-64. PubMed ID: 26280609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical and radiological outcome of the cemented Contemporary acetabular component in patients < 50 years of age.
    Schmitz MW; Timmer C; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; Schreurs BW
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Dec; 95-B(12):1617-25. PubMed ID: 24293590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adverse Reactions to Metal on Metal Are Not Exclusive to Large Heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Lombardi AV; Berend KR; Adams JB; Satterwhite KL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 26497881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiological evaluation of allograft reconstruction in acetabulum with Ganz reinforcement ring in revision total hip replacement.
    Uchiyama K; Takahira N; Fukushima K; Yamamoto T; Moriya M; Itoman M
    J Orthop Sci; 2010 Nov; 15(6):764-71. PubMed ID: 21116894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Treatment of acetabular defects with the trabecular metal revision system].
    Wassilew GI; Janz V; Perka C; Müller M
    Orthopade; 2017 Feb; 46(2):148-157. PubMed ID: 28083681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Isolated revision of an acetabular component to a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing in patients under 50 years of age.
    Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Sep; 97-B(9):1197-203. PubMed ID: 26330585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Low Frequency of Early Complications With Dual-mobility Acetabular Cups in Cementless Primary THA.
    Chughtai M; Mistry JB; Diedrich AM; Jauregui JJ; Elmallah RK; Bonutti PM; Harwin SF; Malkani AL; Kolisek FR; Mont MA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2181-7. PubMed ID: 27106128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.