These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23100155)

  • 21. Resurfacing arthroplasty for patients with osteonecrosis.
    Stulberg BN; Fitts SM; Zadzilka JD; Trier K
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):138-41. PubMed ID: 19583542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing for obese patients.
    Le Duff MJ; Amstutz HC; Dorey FJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Dec; 89(12):2705-11. PubMed ID: 18056503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Metal ion levels and functional results after either resurfacing hip arthroplasty or conventional metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.
    Smolders JM; Hol A; Rijnberg WJ; van Susante JL
    Acta Orthop; 2011 Oct; 82(5):559-66. PubMed ID: 22103280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing.
    Pollard TC; Baker RP; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 May; 88(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 16645103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Results of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 12 to 15 years: a single-surgeon series.
    Daniel J; Pradhan C; Ziaee H; Pynsent PB; McMinn DJ
    Bone Joint J; 2014 Oct; 96-B(10):1298-306. PubMed ID: 25274912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty - patients and outcomes.
    Fowble VA; dela Rosa MA; Schmalzried TP
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 19583535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ten-year clinical, radiological and metal ion analysis of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: from a single, non-designer surgeon.
    Holland JP; Langton DJ; Hashmi M
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Apr; 94(4):471-6. PubMed ID: 22434461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: short-term clinical and radiographic outcome.
    Witzleb WC; Arnold M; Krummenauer F; Knecht A; Ranisch H; Günther KP
    Eur J Med Res; 2008 Jan; 13(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 18226996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Five-year results of the ASR XL Acetabular System and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    de Steiger RN; Hang JR; Miller LN; Graves SE; Davidson DC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93(24):2287-93. PubMed ID: 22258775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The early outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: an independent Thai surgeon experiences.
    Larbpaiboonpong V; Turajane T; Pragtong P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S134-40. PubMed ID: 20120675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 140 consecutive hips with a minimum five year follow-up. A clinical, radiological and histological analysis.
    Giannini S; Cadossi M; Chiarello E; Faldini C; Moroni A; Romagnoli M
    Hip Int; 2011; 21(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 21279970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Jogging after total hip arthroplasty.
    Abe H; Sakai T; Nishii T; Takao M; Nakamura N; Sugano N
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Jan; 42(1):131-7. PubMed ID: 24114754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparing 1-year and 10-year whole blood metal ion results following Birmingham hip resurfacing for osteoarthritis.
    Watt Kearns SJ; Bourget-Murray J; Johnston K; Werle J
    Can J Surg; 2022; 65(4):E504-E511. PubMed ID: 35926884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of patient-reported outcomes between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement.
    Lingard EA; Muthumayandi K; Holland JP
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Dec; 91(12):1550-4. PubMed ID: 19949115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. No Difference in Reoperations at 2 Years Between Ceramic-on-metal and Metal-on-metal THA: A Randomized Trial.
    Engh CA; Sritulanondha S; Korczak A; Whalen TD; Naudie DD; McCalden RW; MacDonald SJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):447-55. PubMed ID: 26135473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Whole blood metal ion concentrations in correlation with activity level in three different metal-on-metal bearings.
    Pattyn CA; Lauwagie SN; Verdonk RC
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Jan; 26(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 20171052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Adverse Reactions to Metal on Metal Are Not Exclusive to Large Heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Lombardi AV; Berend KR; Adams JB; Satterwhite KL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 26497881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The 21- to 27-year results of the Harris-Galante cementless total hip arthroplasty.
    Kawamura H; Mishima H; Sugaya H; Nishino T; Shimizu Y; Miyakawa S
    J Orthop Sci; 2016 May; 21(3):342-7. PubMed ID: 26970833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Early Lessons From a Worldwide, Multicenter, Followup Study of the Recalled Articular Surface Replacement Hip System.
    Madanat R; Hussey DK; Donahue GS; Potter HG; Wallace R; Bragdon C; Muratoglu O; Malchau H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jan; 474(1):166-74. PubMed ID: 26310677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A two-year study.
    Glyn-Jones S; Gill HS; McLardy-Smith P; Murray DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2004 Mar; 86(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 15046428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.