513 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23100273)
1. Acoustic emission analysis of tooth-composite interfacial debonding.
Cho NY; Ferracane JL; Lee IB
J Dent Res; 2013 Jan; 92(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 23100273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology.
Ilie N; Hickel R
Dent Mater; 2011 Apr; 27(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 21194743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microleakage evaluation of Silorane-based composite and methacrylate-based composite in class II box preparations using two different layering techniques: an in vitro study.
Joseph A; Santhosh L; Hegde J; Panchajanya S; George R
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):148. PubMed ID: 23852255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of C-factor on microtensile bond strengths of low-shrinkage composites.
El-Sahn NA; El-Kassas DW; El-Damanhoury HM; Fahmy OM; Gomaa H; Platt JA
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):281-92. PubMed ID: 21740240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Properties of composite materials used for bracket bonding.
Gama AC; Moraes AG; Yamasaki LC; Loguercio AD; Carvalho CN; Bauer J
Braz Dent J; 2013; 24(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 23969920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
Duarte S; de Freitas CR; Saad JR; Sadan A
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-destructive examination of interfacial debonding using acoustic emission.
Li H; Li J; Yun X; Liu X; Fok AS
Dent Mater; 2011 Oct; 27(10):964-71. PubMed ID: 21752458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bonding of low-shrinking composites in high C-factor cavities.
Van Ende A; Mine A; De Munck J; Poitevin A; Van Meerbeek B
J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):295-303. PubMed ID: 22273743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining.
Guéders AM; Charpentier JF; Albert AI; Geerts SO
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 16924985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Push-out strength of translucent fibre posts cemented using a dual-curing technique or a light-curing self-adhering material.
Giachetti L; Scaminaci Russo D; Baldini M; Bertini F; Steier L; Ferrari M
Int Endod J; 2012 Mar; 45(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 22007679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored with silorane-based or dimethacrylate-based composite resins.
Akbarian G; Ameri H; Chasteen JE; Ghavamnasiri M
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 24103086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between degree of conversion, resin-dentin bond strength and nanoleakage of simplified etch-and-rinse adhesives.
Hass V; Dobrovolski M; Zander-Grande C; Martins GC; Gordillo LA; Rodrigues Accorinte Mde L; Gomes OM; Loguercio AD; Reis A
Dent Mater; 2013 Sep; 29(9):921-8. PubMed ID: 23830512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine.
Muñoz MA; Luque I; Hass V; Reis A; Loguercio AD; Bombarda NH
J Dent; 2013 May; 41(5):404-11. PubMed ID: 23499568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cuspal deflection and cervical microleakage scores to determine the adhesive potential of universal bonding systems.
Kearns JO; Barry JG; Fleming GJ
J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):970-6. PubMed ID: 24943379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Creating the "Perfect" Class V Composite: The Matrix Is Key.
Belvedere PC; Lambert DL
Dent Today; 2016 Feb; 35(2):104, 106-7. PubMed ID: 26995844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Five-year clinical performance of a silorane- vs a methacrylate-based composite combined with two different adhesive approaches.
Baracco B; Fuentes MV; Ceballos L
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jun; 20(5):991-1001. PubMed ID: 26388406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of filling technique and curing mode on the bond strengths of composite cores to pulpal floor dentin.
Ariyoshi M; Nikaido T; Foxton RM; Tagami J
Dent Mater J; 2010 Oct; 29(5):562-9. PubMed ID: 20733260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bonding ability of three ethanol-based adhesives after thermal fatigue.
Perdigão J; Gomes G; Sezinando A
Am J Dent; 2011 Jun; 24(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 21874936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
