66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23102460)
1. [Comparison of nucleic acid extraction efficiency using different commercial kits and qPCR. Effect of inhibitors].
Poma HR; Davies C; Gutiérrez Cacciabue D; Mora MC; Basombrío MÁ; Rajal VB
Rev Argent Microbiol; 2012; 44(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 23102460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficiency evaluation of the process control virus "Mengovirus" in real time RT-PCR viral detection in the bivalve mollusc Donax sp.
Londoñe-Bailon P; Sánchez-Robinet C
J Virol Methods; 2018 Dec; 262():20-25. PubMed ID: 30236897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of different RNA-extraction kits for sensitive detection of hepatitis A virus in strawberry samples.
Bianchi S; Dal Vecchio A; Vilariño ML; Romalde JL
Food Microbiol; 2011 Feb; 28(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 21056773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. One-Step RT-PCR protocols improve the rate of dengue diagnosis compared to Two-Step RT-PCR approaches.
De Paula SO; de Melo Lima C; Torres MP; Pereira MR; Lopes da Fonseca BA
J Clin Virol; 2004 Aug; 30(4):297-301. PubMed ID: 15163417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of commercial kits for the extraction and purification of viral nucleic acids from environmental and fecal samples.
Iker BC; Bright KR; Pepper IL; Gerba CP; Kitajima M
J Virol Methods; 2013 Jul; 191(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 23578704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of an RNA extraction protocol for detection of waterborne viruses by reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR).
Jothikumar N; Sobsey MD; Cromeans TL
J Virol Methods; 2010 Oct; 169(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 20600332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of hollow fiber ultrafiltration and real-time PCR using bacteriophage PP7 as surrogate for the quantification of viruses from water samples.
Rajal VB; McSwain BS; Thompson DE; Leutenegger CM; Kildare BJ; Wuertz S
Water Res; 2007 Apr; 41(7):1411-22. PubMed ID: 17313967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative procedures for sample processing and quantitative PCR detection of grapevine viruses.
Osman F; Olineka T; Hodzic E; Golino D; Rowhani A
J Virol Methods; 2012 Feb; 179(2):303-10. PubMed ID: 22115785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Detection of the genome of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) using the polymerase chain reaction after reverse transcription (RT-PCR): comparison of methods for the isolation of ribonucleic acid (RNA) from clinical samples].
Scheibner H; Frey HR; Eicken K; Meyer H; Greiser-Wilke I
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2000 Nov; 107(11):431-7. PubMed ID: 11153228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of five commercial DNA extraction kits for the recovery of Francisella tularensis DNA from spiked soil samples.
Whitehouse CA; Hottel HE
Mol Cell Probes; 2007 Apr; 21(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 17011748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cross-platform evaluation of commercial real-time reverse transcription PCR master mix kits using a quantitative 5'nuclease assay for Ebola virus.
Stephens KW; Hutchins RJ; Dauphin LA
Mol Cell Probes; 2010 Dec; 24(6):370-5. PubMed ID: 20732412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the utility of five commercial kits for extraction of DNA from Aspergillus fumigatus spores.
Nawrot U; Wlodarczyk K; Wrobel M; Wasik A; Dobosz T
Acta Biochim Pol; 2010; 57(4):567-71. PubMed ID: 20978634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Metagenomic analysis of viral nucleic acid extraction methods in respiratory clinical samples.
Zhang D; Lou X; Yan H; Pan J; Mao H; Tang H; Shu Y; Zhao Y; Liu L; Li J; Chen J; Zhang Y; Ma X
BMC Genomics; 2018 Oct; 19(1):773. PubMed ID: 30359242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A sensitive and quantitative single-tube real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR for detection of enteroviral RNA.
Mohamed N; Elfaitouri A; Fohlman J; Friman G; Blomberg J
J Clin Virol; 2004 Jun; 30(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 15125871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reducing the effects of environmental inhibition in quantitative real-time PCR detection of adenovirus and norovirus in recreational seawaters.
Rodríguez RA; Thie L; Gibbons CD; Sobsey MD
J Virol Methods; 2012 Apr; 181(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 22326277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of nucleic acid extraction platforms for detection of select biothreat agents for use in clinical resource limited settings.
Shipley MA; Koehler JW; Kulesh DA; Minogue TD
J Microbiol Methods; 2012 Oct; 91(1):179-83. PubMed ID: 22750394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trypanosoma cruzi: multiplex PCR to detect and classify strains according to groups I and II.
Liarte DB; Murta SM; Steindel M; Romanha AJ
Exp Parasitol; 2009 Dec; 123(4):283-91. PubMed ID: 19133262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of transcription mediated amplification (TMA) and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for detection of hepatitis C virus RNA in liver tissue.
Hofmann WP; Dries V; Herrmann E; Gärtner B; Zeuzem S; Sarrazin C
J Clin Virol; 2005 Apr; 32(4):289-93. PubMed ID: 15780807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Resistance of Acanthamoeba to classic DNA extraction methods used for the diagnosis of corneal infections.
Goldschmidt P; Degorge S; Saint-Jean C; Yera H; Zekhnini F; Batellier L; Laroche L; Chaumeil C
Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 92(1):112-5. PubMed ID: 17965106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rapid detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus using a field-portable nucleic acid extraction and real-time PCR amplification platform.
Madi M; Hamilton A; Squirrell D; Mioulet V; Evans P; Lee M; King DP
Vet J; 2012 Jul; 193(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 22115952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
