134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23102633)
1. Compensation for matrix effects in the gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of 186 pesticides in tea matrices using analyte protectants.
Li Y; Chen X; Fan C; Pang G
J Chromatogr A; 2012 Nov; 1266():131-42. PubMed ID: 23102633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determination of 195 pesticide residues in Chinese herbs by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry using analyte protectants.
Wang Y; Jin HY; Ma SC; Lu J; Lin RC
J Chromatogr A; 2011 Jan; 1218(2):334-42. PubMed ID: 21146173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combination of analyte protectants to overcome matrix effects in routine GC analysis of pesticide residues in food matrixes.
Mastovská K; Lehotay SJ; Anastassiades M
Anal Chem; 2005 Dec; 77(24):8129-37. PubMed ID: 16351165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determination of 23 pesticide residues in leafy vegetables using gas chromatography-ion trap mass spectrometry and analyte protectants.
González-Rodríguez RM; Rial-Otero R; Cancho-Grande B; Simal-Gándara J
J Chromatogr A; 2008 Jul; 1196-1197():100-9. PubMed ID: 18343389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pesticide analysis in teas and chamomile by liquid chromatography and gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry using a modified QuEChERS method: validation and pilot survey in real samples.
Lozano A; Rajski Ł; Belmonte-Valles N; Uclés A; Uclés S; Mezcua M; Fernández-Alba AR
J Chromatogr A; 2012 Dec; 1268():109-22. PubMed ID: 23127810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Study of matrix-induced effects in multi-residue determination of pesticides by online gel permeation chromatography-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry.
Yu S; Xu XM
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2012 Apr; 26(8):963-77. PubMed ID: 22396034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of agricultural residues on tea using d-SPE sample preparation with GC-NCI-MS and UHPLC-MS/MS.
Zhang X; Mobley N; Zhang J; Zheng X; Lu L; Ragin O; Smith CJ
J Agric Food Chem; 2010 Nov; 58(22):11553-60. PubMed ID: 20961040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determination of pesticide residues by GC-MS using analyte protectants to counteract the matrix effect.
Sánchez-Brunete C; Albero B; Martín G; Tadeo JL
Anal Sci; 2005 Nov; 21(11):1291-6. PubMed ID: 16317896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Planar solid phase extraction clean-up for pesticide residue analysis in tea by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Oellig C; Schwack W
J Chromatogr A; 2012 Oct; 1260():42-53. PubMed ID: 22981507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simultaneous determination of 102 pesticide residues in Chinese teas by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Huang Z; Li Y; Chen B; Yao S
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2007 Jun; 853(1-2):154-62. PubMed ID: 17400037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variability of matrix effects in liquid and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of pesticide residues after QuEChERS sample preparation of different food crops.
Kwon H; Lehotay SJ; Geis-Asteggiante L
J Chromatogr A; 2012 Dec; 1270():235-45. PubMed ID: 23182936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determinations for Pesticides on Black, Green, Oolong, and White Teas by Gas Chromatography Triple-Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry.
Hayward DG; Wong JW; Park HY
J Agric Food Chem; 2015 Sep; 63(37):8116-24. PubMed ID: 26209005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Determination of 53 pesticide residues in tea by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and double internal standard method].
Gao Y; Chen P; Nie D
Se Pu; 2018 Jun; 36(6):531-540. PubMed ID: 30136474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Streamlining sample preparation and gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis of multiple pesticide residues in tea.
Cajka T; Sandy C; Bachanova V; Drabova L; Kalachova K; Pulkrabova J; Hajslova J
Anal Chim Acta; 2012 Sep; 743():51-60. PubMed ID: 22882823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Rapid determination of 40 pesticide residues in fruits using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry coupled with analyte protectants to compensate for matrix effects].
Xu X; Zhao H; Li L; Liu H; Ren H; Zhong W
Se Pu; 2012 Mar; 30(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 22715692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of some parameters affecting troublesome pesticide analysis in gas chromatography-ion-trap mass spectrometry.
Przybylski C; Hommet F
J Chromatogr A; 2008 Aug; 1201(1):78-90. PubMed ID: 18555259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Compensation for matrix effects in gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry using a single point standard addition.
Garrido Frenich A; Martínez Vidal JL; Fernández Moreno JL; Romero-González R
J Chromatogr A; 2009 Jun; 1216(23):4798-808. PubMed ID: 19406413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of automated direct sample introduction with analyte protectants in the GC-MS analysis of pesticide residues.
Cajka T; Mastovská K; Lehotay SJ; Hajslová J
J Sep Sci; 2005 Jun; 28(9-10):1048-60. PubMed ID: 16013832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An applicable strategy for improvement recovery in simultaneous analysis of 20 pesticides residue in tea.
Shoeibi S; Amirahmadi M; Rastegar H; Khosrokhavar R; Khaneghah AM
J Food Sci; 2013 May; 78(5):T792-6. PubMed ID: 23534490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of head-space solid-phase microextraction coupled to comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry for the determination of multiple pesticide residues in tea samples.
Schurek J; Portolés T; Hajslova J; Riddellova K; Hernández F
Anal Chim Acta; 2008 Mar; 611(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 18328317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
