140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2310271)
1. 'Cookbook' medicine. A legal perspective.
Kapp MB
Arch Intern Med; 1990 Mar; 150(3):496-500. PubMed ID: 2310271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The defensive effect of medical practice policies in malpractice litigation.
Hall MA
Law Contemp Probl; 1991; 54(1-2):Spring 119-45. PubMed ID: 10114970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Practice guidelines as legal standards governing physician liability.
Havighurst CC
Law Contemp Probl; 1991; 54(1-2):Spring 87-117. PubMed ID: 10114977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. From the Office of the General Counsel. Should practice parameters be the standard of care in malpractice litigation?
Hirshfeld EB
JAMA; 1991 Nov; 266(20):2886-91. PubMed ID: 1942459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cookbook medicine.
Kosterlitz J
Natl J (Wash); 1991 Mar; 23(10):574-7. PubMed ID: 10110168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A patient, an internet article, and thou: challenges of the Internet in clinical practice.
Falk R
J Med Pract Manage; 2005; 20(4):180-2. PubMed ID: 15779513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The legal implications of medical practice guidelines.
West JC
J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Apr; 27(4):97-103, 128. PubMed ID: 10136114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. What cookbook medicine will mean for you.
Holoweiko M
Med Econ; 1989 Dec; 66(25):118-20, 125-7, 130-3. PubMed ID: 10296724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Hospital quality measurement: a story of failure and success.
Spath PL
Top Health Rec Manage; 1990 Mar; 10(3):1-22. PubMed ID: 10106438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Roundtable demonstration ... review of care given in private physician offices to Medicare beneficiaries.
Palmer RH
Med Care; 1995 Jan; 33(1 Suppl):JS41-4; discussion JS44-7. PubMed ID: 7823658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: what physicians need to know about the Act.
Hay CR
Kans Med; 1989 Sep; 90(9):239-40, 242, 244. PubMed ID: 2810989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. From Bolam to Ipp.
Hourigan KJ
Intern Med J; 2005 Jul; 35(7):438-9; author reply 439-40. PubMed ID: 15958120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. From Bolam to Ipp: an examination of the standard of care in medical negligence cases since 1957.
Burdon J
Intern Med J; 2004 Dec; 34(12):662. PubMed ID: 15610209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. How should medical malpractice claims be handled? An economist's view.
Tulasidhar V
J Indian Med Assoc; 1993 Jul; 91(7):189-92. PubMed ID: 8263338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Negligence law and the required standard of care.
Edelman J
Hosp Med Staff; 1975 Jun; 4(6):28-9. PubMed ID: 10273077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical practice guidelines: innovation or failed initiative?
Sundwall DN
Am Fam Physician; 1991 May; 43(5):1864-6. PubMed ID: 2021111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. "No fault," round three.
De Ville K
N C Med J; 1994 Oct; 55(10):455-6. PubMed ID: 7800053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Uncle Sam's written invitation to sue you.
Stevens C
Med Econ; 1987 Mar; 64(6):32-7. PubMed ID: 10281011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. S. 1232--a late entry in the race for malpractice reform.
Havighurst CC; Metzloff TB
Law Contemp Probl; 1991; 54(1-2):Spring 179-97. PubMed ID: 10114972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical malpractice: thinking about the federal role.
Blumstein JF
J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1989; 12(1):149-65. PubMed ID: 10296434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
