242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23102856)
1. The accuracy and reproducibility of the endometrial receptivity array is superior to histology as a diagnostic method for endometrial receptivity.
Díaz-Gimeno P; Ruiz-Alonso M; Blesa D; Bosch N; Martínez-Conejero JA; Alamá P; Garrido N; Pellicer A; Simón C
Fertil Steril; 2013 Feb; 99(2):508-17. PubMed ID: 23102856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Timing the window of implantation by nucleolar channel system prevalence matches the accuracy of the endometrial receptivity array.
Nejat EJ; Ruiz-Alonso M; Simón C; Meier UT
Fertil Steril; 2014 Nov; 102(5):1477-81. PubMed ID: 25241377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The accuracy and interobserver reproducibility of endometrial dating.
Duggan MA; Brashert P; Ostor A; Scurry J; Billson V; Kneafsey P; Difrancesco L
Pathology; 2001 Aug; 33(3):292-7. PubMed ID: 11523927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The endometrial receptivity array for diagnosis and personalized embryo transfer as a treatment for patients with repeated implantation failure.
Ruiz-Alonso M; Blesa D; Díaz-Gimeno P; Gómez E; Fernández-Sánchez M; Carranza F; Carrera J; Vilella F; Pellicer A; Simón C
Fertil Steril; 2013 Sep; 100(3):818-24. PubMed ID: 23756099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing endometrial receptivity array to histologic dating of the endometrium in women with a history of implantation failure.
Cohen AM; Ye XY; Colgan TJ; Greenblatt EM; Chan C
Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2020 Dec; 66(6):347-354. PubMed ID: 32998580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Discovery of biomarkers of endometrial receptivity through a minimally invasive approach: a validation study with implications for assisted reproduction.
Chan C; Virtanen C; Winegarden NA; Colgan TJ; Brown TJ; Greenblatt EM
Fertil Steril; 2013 Sep; 100(3):810-7. PubMed ID: 23725802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation of endometrial maturation with four methods of estimating day of ovulation.
Shoupe D; Mishell DR; Lacarra M; Lobo RA; Horenstein J; d'Ablaing G; Moyer D
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jan; 73(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 2642330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A critical analysis of the accuracy, reproducibility, and clinical utility of histologic endometrial dating in fertile women.
Murray MJ; Meyer WR; Zaino RJ; Lessey BA; Novotny DB; Ireland K; Zeng D; Fritz MA
Fertil Steril; 2004 May; 81(5):1333-43. PubMed ID: 15136099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Study on the accuracy of uterine endometrial dating].
Andoh K; Nakazato Y; Mizunuma H; Yamada K; Ibuki Y; Igarashi M
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Dec; 42(12):1663-70. PubMed ID: 2277206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consistency of endometrial receptivity array and histologic dating of spatially distinct endometrial samplings: a prospective, blinded study.
Place TL; Agarwal R; Najafzadeh P; Walia S; McGinnis LK; Kohli P; Felix JC; Paulson RJ
F S Rep; 2023 Dec; 4(4):375-379. PubMed ID: 38204947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of ovulation by a single endometrial aspiration smear. A preliminary report.
Affandi MZ; Doctor V; Rao SS
Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(2):157-9. PubMed ID: 6941614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the histological dating of the endometrium in fertile and infertile women.
Myers ER; Silva S; Barnhart K; Groben PA; Richardson MS; Robboy SJ; Leppert P; Coutifaris C;
Fertil Steril; 2004 Nov; 82(5):1278-82. PubMed ID: 15533342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of implantation-related cytokines in cervicovaginal secretions and peripheral blood of fertile women during ovulatory menstrual cycles.
Gargiulo AR; Fichorova RN; Politch JA; Hill JA; Anderson DJ
Fertil Steril; 2004 Oct; 82 Suppl 3():1226-34. PubMed ID: 15474100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Profiling the gene signature of endometrial receptivity: clinical results.
Garrido-Gómez T; Ruiz-Alonso M; Blesa D; Diaz-Gimeno P; Vilella F; Simón C
Fertil Steril; 2013 Mar; 99(4):1078-85. PubMed ID: 23312228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modulation of HOXA10 and other markers of endometrial receptivity by age and human chorionic gonadotropin in an endometrial explant model.
Fogle RH; Li A; Paulson RJ
Fertil Steril; 2010 Mar; 93(4):1255-9. PubMed ID: 19131054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Potential enhancement of endometrial receptivity in cycles using controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with antiprogestins: a hypothesis.
Paulson RJ; Sauer MV; Lobo RA
Fertil Steril; 1997 Feb; 67(2):321-5. PubMed ID: 9022610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of levonorgestrel and mifepristone on endometrial receptivity markers in a three-dimensional human endometrial cell culture model.
Meng CX; Andersson KL; Bentin-Ley U; Gemzell-Danielsson K; Lalitkumar PG
Fertil Steril; 2009 Jan; 91(1):256-64. PubMed ID: 18206148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endometrial biopsy-induced gene modulation: first evidence for the expression of bladder-transmembranal uroplakin Ib in human endometrium.
Kalma Y; Granot I; Gnainsky Y; Or Y; Czernobilsky B; Dekel N; Barash A
Fertil Steril; 2009 Apr; 91(4):1042-9, 1049.e1-9. PubMed ID: 18355812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differential expression of endometrial integrins and progesterone receptor during the window of implantation in normo-ovulatory women treated with clomiphene citrate.
Palomino WA; Fuentes A; González RR; Gabler F; Boric MA; Vega M; Devoto L
Fertil Steril; 2005 Mar; 83(3):587-93. PubMed ID: 15749485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization alters endometrial receptivity in humans: protocol effects.
Haouzi D; Assou S; Dechanet C; Anahory T; Dechaud H; De Vos J; Hamamah S
Biol Reprod; 2010 Apr; 82(4):679-86. PubMed ID: 20042535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
