162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23103477)
1. Monte Carlo-based correction factors for ion chamber dosimetry in heterogeneous phantoms for megavoltage photon beams.
Araki F
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(22):7615-27. PubMed ID: 23103477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Monte Carlo correction factors for a Farmer 0.6 cm3 ion chamber dose measurement in the build-up region of the 6 MV clinical beam.
Pena J; Sánchez-Doblado F; Capote R; Terrón JA; Gómez F
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1523-32. PubMed ID: 16510960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of PENELOPE Monte Carlo dose calculations with Fricke dosimeter and ionization chamber measurements in heterogeneous phantoms (18 MeV electron and 12 MV photon beams).
Blazy L; Baltes D; Bordy JM; Cutarella D; Delaunay F; Gouriou J; Leroy E; Ostrowsky A; Beaumont S
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5951-65. PubMed ID: 17068376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perturbation correction factors for the NACP-02 plane-parallel ionization chamber in water in high-energy electron beams.
Verhaegen F; Zakikhani R; Dusautoy A; Palmans H; Bostock G; Shipley D; Seuntjens J
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(5):1221-35. PubMed ID: 16481689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monte Carlo study of correction factors for the use of plastic phantoms in clinical electron dosimetry.
Araki F
Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4368-77. PubMed ID: 18072502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Properties of IBA Razor Nano Chamber in small-field radiation therapy using 6 MV FF, 6 MV FFF, and 10 MV FFF photon beams.
Partanen M; Niemelä J; Ojala J; Keyriläinen J; Kapanen M
Acta Oncol; 2021 Nov; 60(11):1419-1424. PubMed ID: 34596486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monte Carlo calculations of beam quality correction factors kQ for electron dosimetry with a parallel-plate Roos chamber.
Zink K; Wulff J
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(6):1595-607. PubMed ID: 18367790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Commissioning stereotactic radiosurgery beams using both experimental and theoretical methods.
Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2549-66. PubMed ID: 16675869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of absorbed dose with a bone-equivalent extrapolation chamber.
DeBlois F; Abdel-Rahman W; Seuntjens JP; Podgorsak EB
Med Phys; 2002 Mar; 29(3):433-40. PubMed ID: 11929025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetry in 1.5 T MR-Linacs: Monte Carlo determination of magnetic field correction factors and investigation of the air gap effect.
Margaroni V; Pappas EP; Episkopakis A; Pantelis E; Papagiannis P; Marinos N; Karaiskos P
Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):1132-1148. PubMed ID: 36349535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental and Monte Carlo-based determination of magnetic field correction factors
Alissa M; Zink K; Kapsch RP; Schoenfeld AA; Frick S; Czarnecki D
Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 50(7):4578-4589. PubMed ID: 36897832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surface dosimetry for oblique tangential photon beams: a Monte Carlo simulation study.
Chow JC; Grigorov GN
Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 18293563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Wall correction factors, Pwall, for thimble ionization chambers.
Buckley LA; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):455-64. PubMed ID: 16532953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte-Carlo-based perturbation and beam quality correction factors for thimble ionization chambers in high-energy photon beams.
Wulff J; Heverhagen JT; Zink K
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(11):2823-36. PubMed ID: 18460747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of dose measurements and calculations within and beyond heterogeneous tissues for 6 MV photon fields smaller than 4 cm produced by Cyberknife.
Wilcox EE; Daskalov GM
Med Phys; 2008 Jun; 35(6):2259-66. PubMed ID: 18649456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Calculation of the replacement correction factors for ion chambers in megavoltage beams by Monte Carlo simulation.
Wang LL; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1747-55. PubMed ID: 18561649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the perturbation effect and LET dependence of beam quality correction factors in carbon ion beams.
Khan AU; Nelson NP; Culberson WS; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):1105-1120. PubMed ID: 36334024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cema-based formalism for the determination of absorbed dose for high-energy photon beams.
Hartmann GH; Andreo P; Kapsch RP; Zink K
Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):7461-7475. PubMed ID: 34613620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of Monte Carlo calculated surface doses for megavoltage photon beams.
Abdel-Rahman W; Seuntjens JP; Verhaegen F; Deblois F; Podgorsak EB
Med Phys; 2005 Jan; 32(1):286-98. PubMed ID: 15719980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurements of output factors with different detector types and Monte Carlo calculations of stopping-power ratios for degraded electron beams.
Björk P; Knöös T; Nilsson P
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Oct; 49(19):4493-506. PubMed ID: 15552413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
