130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23105124)
1. Comparison of a powered bone marrow biopsy device with a manual system: results of a prospective randomised controlled trial.
Bucher CM; Lehmann T; Tichelli A; Tzankov A; Dirnhofer S; Passweg J; Rovó A
J Clin Pathol; 2013 Jan; 66(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 23105124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective randomised study of a rotary powered device (OnControl) for bone marrow aspiration and biopsy.
Swords RT; Anguita J; Higgins RA; Yunes AC; Naski M; Padmanabhan S; Kelly KR; Mahalingam D; Philbeck T; Miller L; Puga TA; Giles FJ; Kinney MC; Brenner AJ
J Clin Pathol; 2011 Sep; 64(9):809-13. PubMed ID: 21606230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using a powered bone marrow biopsy system results in shorter procedures, causes less residual pain to adult patients, and yields larger specimens.
Berenson JR; Yellin O; Blumenstein B; Bojanower D; Croopnick J; Aboulafia D; Upadhyaya G; Spadaccini C
Diagn Pathol; 2011 Mar; 6():23. PubMed ID: 21429220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone marrow biopsies performed by both the powered OnControl drill device and the Jamshidi needle produce adequate specimens.
Jain S; Enzerra M; Mehta RS; Smith R; Djokic M
J Clin Pathol; 2017 Jun; 70(6):541-543. PubMed ID: 28062659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rotary powered device for bone marrow aspiration and biopsy yields excellent specimens quickly and efficiently.
Swords RT; Kelly KR; Cohen SC; Miller LJ; Philbeck TE; Hacker SO; Spadaccini CJ; Giles FJ; Brenner AJ
J Clin Pathol; 2010 Jun; 63(6):562-5. PubMed ID: 20404008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the bone marrow trephine sample quality between OnControl drill system and the Jamshidi needle.
Forwood KM; Lee E; Crispin PJ
Int J Lab Hematol; 2019 Jun; 41(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 30779423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adequacy of powered vs manual bone marrow biopsy specimens: a retrospective review of sequential marrow aspirates and biopsies in 68 patients.
Lynch DW; Stauffer SL; Rosenthal NS
Am J Clin Pathol; 2015 Apr; 143(4):535-9. PubMed ID: 25780005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy and safety of bone marrow aspiration and biopsy using fluoroscopic guidance and a drill-powered needle: clinical experience from 775 cases.
Long JR; Stensby JD; Wiesner EL; Bryson WN; Hillen TJ; Jennings JW
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):5964-5970. PubMed ID: 32518988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the safety and efficacy of methoxyflurane for procedural pain of a bone marrow biopsy.
Spruyt O; Westerman D; Milner A; Bressel M; Wein S
BMJ Support Palliat Care; 2014 Dec; 4(4):342-8. PubMed ID: 24644183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Periprostatic lidocaine infiltration and/or synthetic opioid (meperidine or tramadol) administration have no analgesic benefit during prostate biopsy. A prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study comparing different methods.
Bozlu M; Atici S; Ulusoy E; Canpolat B; Cayan S; Akbay E; Schellhammer PF; Oral U
Urol Int; 2004; 72(4):308-11. PubMed ID: 15153728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparative study between analgesic efficacy and safety of meperidine compared with lidocaine periprostatic infiltration in transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy].
Luján Marco S; Bango García V; Arlandis Guzmán S; Di Capua Sacoto C; Bahílo Mateu P; Trassierra Villa M; Ramírez Backhaus M; Jiménez Cruz JF
Actas Urol Esp; 2009 Jan; 33(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 19462722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a powered intraosseous device for bone marrow sampling.
Cohen SC; Gore JM
Anticancer Res; 2008; 28(6B):3843-6. PubMed ID: 19192638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Battery-Powered and Manual Bone Biopsy Systems for Core Needle Biopsy of Sclerotic Bone Lesions.
Cohen MG; McMahon CJ; Kung JW; Wu JS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):W83-6. PubMed ID: 26959290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Powered bone marrow biopsy procedures produce larger core specimens, with less pain, in less time than with standard manual devices.
Miller LJ; Philbeck TE; Montez DF; Puga TA; Brodie KE; Cohen SC; Spadaccini C; Swords R; Brenner AJ
Hematol Rep; 2011 Jan; 3(1):e8. PubMed ID: 22184530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of buffered lidocaine in bone marrow biopsies: a randomized, controlled trial.
Ruegg TA; Curran CR; Lamb T
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2009 Jan; 36(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 19136338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sedation with midazolam versus midazolam plus meperidine for routine colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.
Cinar K; Yakut M; Ozden A
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2009 Dec; 20(4):271-5. PubMed ID: 20084571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nitrous oxide analgesia for bone marrow aspiration and biopsy - A randomized, controlled and patient blinded study.
Kuivalainen AM; Ebeling F; Poikonen E; Rosenberg PH
Scand J Pain; 2015 Apr; 7(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 29911602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The OnControl bone marrow biopsy technique is superior to the standard manual technique for hematologists-in-training: a prospective, randomized comparison.
Reed LJ; Raghupathy R; Strakhan M; Philbeck TE; Kim MY; Battini R; Hussain Z; Abdullah S; Schweber S; Bala K; Pacello T
Hematol Rep; 2011 Oct; 3(3):e21. PubMed ID: 22593813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing patient satisfaction with cataract surgery under topical anesthesia supplemented by intracameral lidocaine combined with sedation.
Fernandes MB; Souza RV; Vasconcelos GC; Ribeiro KG; Andrade BB; Fernandes CR
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2013; 76(6):345-9. PubMed ID: 24510080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of articaine and lidocaine for infiltration anaesthesia in patients undergoing bone marrow aspiration and biopsy.
Kuivalainen AM; Niemi-Murola L; Widenius T; Elonen E; Rosenberg PH
Eur J Pain; 2010 Feb; 14(2):160-3. PubMed ID: 19473858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
