227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23106470)
1. Evaluation of a novel suture material for closure of intestinal anastomoses in canine cadavers.
Hansen LA; Monnet EL
Am J Vet Res; 2012 Nov; 73(11):1819-23. PubMed ID: 23106470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of serosal patch supplementation of surgical anastomoses in intestinal segments from canine cadavers.
Hansen LA; Monnet EL
Am J Vet Res; 2013 Aug; 74(8):1138-41. PubMed ID: 23879853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of presurgical storage conditions on leakage pressures of enterotomy sites closed with unidirectional barbed suture material in fresh, chilled, and frozen-thawed cadaveric canine jejunal specimens.
Duffy DJ; Chang YJ; Balko JA; Moore GE
Am J Vet Res; 2020 Mar; 81(3):220-226. PubMed ID: 32101038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of leak pressures for single-layer simple continuous suture pattern for cystotomy closure using barbed and monofilament suture material in an ex vivo canine model.
Kieves NR; Krebs AI
Vet Surg; 2017 Apr; 46(3):412-416. PubMed ID: 28177538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparison of glycomer 631 and glycomer 631 knotless for use in canine incisional gastropexy.
Arbaugh M; Case JB; Monnet E
Vet Surg; 2013 Feb; 42(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 23094713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gastrointestinal thickness, duration, and leak pressure of six intestinal anastomoses in dogs.
Mullen KM; Regier PJ; Waln M; Fox-Alvarez WA; Colee J
Vet Surg; 2020 Oct; 49(7):1315-1325. PubMed ID: 32697359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ex vivo comparison of hand-sutured versus circular stapled anastomosis in canine large intestine.
Sapora JA; Hafez A; Monnet E
Vet Surg; 2021 Oct; 50(7):1495-1501. PubMed ID: 34355807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo assessment of an absorbable and nonabsorbable knotless barbed suture for laparoscopic single-layer enterotomy closure: a clinical and biomechanical comparison against nonbarbed suture.
Omotosho P; Yurcisin B; Ceppa E; Miller J; Kirsch D; Portenier DD
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2011 Dec; 21(10):893-7. PubMed ID: 22129144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of five synthetic absorbable suture materials in intestinal anastomosis: experimental study in rats].
de Werra C; Rendano F; D'Armiento F; Somma P; Forestieri P
Chir Ital; 2003; 55(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 12744098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of a simple continuous versus simple interrupted suture pattern for the repair of a large, open duodenal defect with a jejunal serosal patch in a canine cadaveric model.
Lorange M; Smeak DD
Am J Vet Res; 2020 Dec; 81(12):985-991. PubMed ID: 33251840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of preconstructed effector loop location using a barbed unidirectional suture on leakage pressures following canine enterotomy closure.
Chang YJ; Duffy DJ; Moore GE
Vet Surg; 2021 Oct; 50(7):1502-1509. PubMed ID: 34405426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of conventional versus unidirectional barbed suture on leakage pressures in canine vesicourethral anastomosis: An ex-vivo study.
Monnet E; Hafez A
Vet Surg; 2023 Jul; 52(5):716-720. PubMed ID: 36898966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ex vivo comparison of leakage pressures and leakage location with a novel technique for creation of functional side-to-side canine small intestinal anastomoses.
Chu KL; Duffy DJ; Vieson MD; Moore GE
Vet Surg; 2020 Jul; 49(5):1024-1034. PubMed ID: 32255208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ex vivo comparison of barbed sutures for pelvic flexure enterotomy in horses.
Sinovich M; Archer DC; Meunier NV; Kelly PG
Vet Surg; 2020 Apr; 49(3):487-495. PubMed ID: 31724764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ex vivo comparison of leak testing of canine jejunal enterotomies: Saline infusion versus air insufflation.
Mullen KM; Regier PJ; Waln M; Colee J
Vet Surg; 2021 Aug; 50(6):1257-1266. PubMed ID: 33983659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of initial leak pressures after single- and double-layer cystotomy closure with barbed and nonbarbed monofilament suture material in an ex vivo ovine model.
Duffy DJ; Kindra CG; Moore GE
Vet Surg; 2019 Apr; 48(3):424-430. PubMed ID: 30635932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of crotch suture augmentation on leakage pressure and leakage location during functional end-to-end stapled anastomoses in dogs.
Duffy DJ; Chang YJ; Moore GE
Vet Surg; 2022 May; 51(4):697-705. PubMed ID: 35020207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ex vivo comparison of three hand sewn end-to-end anastomoses in normal equine jejunum.
Sherlock C; Lee W; Mueller PO; Eggleston R; Epstein K
Equine Vet J Suppl; 2011 Aug; (39):76-80. PubMed ID: 21790758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of leakage pressure following enterotomy closure reinforced by tissue adhesive in a caprine cadaver model.
Jones CT; Chen CY; Campbell BG; Fransson BA
N Z Vet J; 2017 Sep; 65(5):248-251. PubMed ID: 28629261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ex vivo comparison of intradermal closures with conventional monofilament suture vs unidirectional barbed suture in dogs.
Regier PJ; Smeak DD; McGilvray KC
Vet Surg; 2019 Nov; 48(8):1399-1405. PubMed ID: 31271237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
