211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23106546)
1. Comparison of two implant-supported molar distalization systems.
Sar C; Kaya B; Ozsoy O; Özcirpici AA
Angle Orthod; 2013 May; 83(3):460-7. PubMed ID: 23106546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pendulum appliances with 2 anchorage designs: conventional anchorage vs bone anchorage.
Polat-Ozsoy O; Kircelli BH; Arman-Ozçirpici A; Pektaş ZO; Uçkan S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):339.e9-339.e17. PubMed ID: 18331928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maxillary molar distalization with the indirect Palatal miniscrew for Anchorage and Distalization Appliance (iPANDA).
Suzuki EY; Suzuki B
Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e228-41. PubMed ID: 23646335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sagittal, vertical, and transverse changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the pendulum appliance.
Fuziy A; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Janson G; Angelieri F; Pinzan A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):502-10. PubMed ID: 17045150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maxillary molar distalization with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance.
Kircelli BH; Pektaş ZO; Kircelli C
Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):650-9. PubMed ID: 16808573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retrospective comparison of two different miniscrew-supported molar distalization methods applied in the buccal and palatal regions.
Aslan YS; Yavan MA; Hamamci N
J World Fed Orthod; 2024 Jun; 13(3):145-152. PubMed ID: 38522972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maxillary molar distalization in treatment of angle class II malocclusion growing patients: Uncontrolled clinical trial.
Abdelhady NA; Tawfik MA; Hammad SM
Int Orthod; 2020 Mar; 18(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 31974060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pendulum and modified pendulum appliances for maxillary molar distalization in Class II malocclusion - a systematic review.
Al-Thomali Y; Basha S; Mohamed RN
Acta Odontol Scand; 2017 Aug; 75(6):394-401. PubMed ID: 28502196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of treatment effects between clear aligners and fixed appliances in patients treated with miniscrew-assisted molar distalization.
Wang Y; Zhou S; Zheng J; Yan L; Ngan P; Hua F; He H
Eur J Orthod; 2024 Jun; 46(3):. PubMed ID: 38733349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 2 distalization systems supported by intraosseous screws.
Gelgor IE; Karaman AI; Buyukyilmaz T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Feb; 131(2):161.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17276855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of maxillary molar distalization with Zygoma-Gear Appliance.
Nur M; Bayram M; Celikoglu M; Kilkis D; Pampu AA
Angle Orthod; 2012 Jul; 82(4):596-602. PubMed ID: 22149541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional changes after maxillary molar distalization with a miniscrew-anchored cantilever.
Vilanova L; Castillo AA; Bellini-Pereira SA; Henriques JFC; Janson G; Garib D; Patel MP; da Costa Grec RH; Yatabe M; Cevidanes L; Ruellas AC
Angle Orthod; 2023 Sep; 93(5):513-523. PubMed ID: 37079798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficiency of a skeletonized distal jet appliance supported by miniscrew anchorage for noncompliance maxillary molar distalization.
Kinzinger GS; Gülden N; Yildizhan F; Diedrich PR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):578-86. PubMed ID: 19815162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusion with miniscrew implants.
Papadopoulos MA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):604.e1-16; discussion 604-5. PubMed ID: 18984391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance.
Caprioglio A; Cozzani M; Fontana M
Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):49. PubMed ID: 25139288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A
Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Palatal implant versus zygoma plate anchorage for distalization of maxillary posterior teeth.
Kaya B; Sar C; Arman-Özçirpici A; Polat-Özsoy O
Eur J Orthod; 2013 Aug; 35(4):507-14. PubMed ID: 22968670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distalization of maxillary molars with the bone-supported pendulum: a clinical study.
Escobar SA; Tellez PA; Moncada CA; Villegas CA; Latorre CM; Oberti G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4):545-9. PubMed ID: 17418723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of zygoma-gear appliance for unilateral maxillary molar distalization: A prospective clinical study.
Kilkis D; Celikoglu M; Nur M; Bayram M; Candirli C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Dec; 150(6):989-996. PubMed ID: 27894548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
