These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2310738)

  • 1. A cephalometric study to compare the effects of cervical traction and Andresen therapy in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion. Part 1--Skeletal changes.
    Derringer K
    Br J Orthod; 1990 Feb; 17(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 2310738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A cephalometric study to compare the effects of cervical traction and Andresen therapy in the treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion. Part 2--Dentoalveolar changes.
    Derringer K
    Br J Orthod; 1990 May; 17(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 2357464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of cervical headgear on patients with high or low mandibular plane angles and the "myth" of posterior mandibular rotation.
    Haralabakis NB; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Sep; 126(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 15356494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vertical skeletal change associated with Andresen, Harvold, and Begg treatment.
    Ball JV; Hunt NP
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Feb; 13(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 2032567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of activator treatment on skeletal growth in Angle Class II: 1 cases. A roentgenocephalometric study.
    Jakobsson SO; Paulin G
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 May; 12(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 2351202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An assessment of Andresen therapy on class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Calvert FJ
    Br J Orthod; 1982 Jul; 9(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 6954989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Lima KJ; Henriques JF; Janson G; Pereira SC; Neves LS; Cançado RH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):684-94. PubMed ID: 23631970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in mandibular growth direction during and after cervical headgear treatment.
    Kim KR; Muhl ZF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):522-30. PubMed ID: 11343025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on the mandibular position.
    Yamaguchi K; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Nov; 100(5):443-52. PubMed ID: 1951197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Study of the structural compensation of the mandible during treatment with cervical headgear].
    Işcan HN; Dinçer M; Gültan AS
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):287-98. PubMed ID: 2489161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jun; 113(6):661-73. PubMed ID: 9637570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of functional appliances on the skeletal pattern.
    Mills JR
    Br J Orthod; 1991 Nov; 18(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 1838280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I.
    Cook AH; Sellke TA; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of treatment with the Bass appliance on skeletal Class II malocclusions: a cephalometric investigation.
    Cura N; Saraç M
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Dec; 19(6):691-702. PubMed ID: 9458602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A study of highpull extraoral traction on the treatment of growing patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion].
    You QL; Cai Z
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2006 Aug; 15(4):375-7. PubMed ID: 16955161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A cephalometric investigation of the effects of the Elastic Bite-block in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Erverdi N; Ozkan G
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Oct; 17(5):375-84. PubMed ID: 8529750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative analysis of the orthodontic and orthopedic effects of maxillary traction.
    Baumrind S; Korn EL; Isaacson RJ; West EE; Molthen R
    Am J Orthod; 1983 Nov; 84(5):384-98. PubMed ID: 6579840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.