These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
613 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23107438)
1. Biomechanical and histomorphometric evaluation of osseointegration of fusion-sputtered zirconia implants. Salem NA; Abo Taleb AL; Aboushelib MN J Prosthodont; 2013 Jun; 22(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 23107438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits. Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Zafiropoulos GG; Andreana S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a new titanium-zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig. Gottlow J; Dard M; Kjellson F; Obrecht M; Sennerby L Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):538-45. PubMed ID: 20586785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants. Ferguson SJ; Langhoff JD; Voelter K; von Rechenberg B; Scharnweber D; Bierbaum S; Schnabelrauch M; Kautz AR; Frauchiger VM; Mueller TL; van Lenthe GH; Schlottig F Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1037-46. PubMed ID: 19216272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical evaluation of a microstructured zirconia implant by a removal torque comparison with a standard Ti-SLA implant. Bormann KH; Gellrich NC; Kniha H; Dard M; Wieland M; Gahlert M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1210-6. PubMed ID: 22092587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant. He F; Yang G; Wang X; Zhao S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical anchorage and peri-implant bone formation of surface-modified zirconia in minipigs. Schliephake H; Hefti T; Schlottig F; Gédet P; Staedt H J Clin Periodontol; 2010 Sep; 37(9):818-28. PubMed ID: 20573183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enhanced osteoconductivity of micro-structured titanium implants (XiVE S CELLplus) by addition of surface calcium chemistry: a histomorphometric study in the rabbit femur. Park JW; Kim HK; Kim YJ; An CH; Hanawa T Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 19489932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of chemically and pharmaceutically modified titanium and zirconia implant surfaces in dentistry: a study in sheep. Langhoff JD; Voelter K; Scharnweber D; Schnabelrauch M; Schlottig F; Hefti T; Kalchofner K; Nuss K; von Rechenberg B Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 37(12):1125-32. PubMed ID: 18977118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dental implant thread pitch and its influence on the osseointegration process: an in vivo comparison study. Orsini E; Giavaresi G; Trirè A; Ottani V; Salgarello S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):383-92. PubMed ID: 22442779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Loaded custom-made zirconia and titanium implants show similar osseointegration: an animal experiment. Kohal RJ; Weng D; Bächle M; Strub JR J Periodontol; 2004 Sep; 75(9):1262-8. PubMed ID: 15515343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of surface nano-roughness on osseointegration of zirconia implants in rabbit femur heads using selective infiltration etching technique. Aboushelib MN; Salem NA; Taleb AL; El Moniem NM J Oral Implantol; 2013 Oct; 39(5):583-90. PubMed ID: 21905894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bone tissue responses to surface-modified zirconia implants: A histomorphometric and removal torque study in the rabbit. Sennerby L; Dasmah A; Larsson B; Iverhed M Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7 Suppl 1():S13-20. PubMed ID: 16137083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo. Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of H2O2/HCl heat treatment of implants on in vivo peri-implant bone formation. Yang GL; He FM; Zhao SS; Wang XX; Zhao SF Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1020-8. PubMed ID: 19216270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Peri-implant bone formations around (Ti,Zr)O(2) -coated zirconia implants with different surface roughness. Chung SH; Kim HK; Shon WJ; Park YS J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Apr; 40(4):404-11. PubMed ID: 23425208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces. Sul YT; Johansson C; Albrektsson T Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 16900812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vivo performance of zirconia and titanium implants: a histomorphometric study in mini pig maxillae. Gahlert M; Roehling S; Sprecher CM; Kniha H; Milz S; Bormann K Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Mar; 23(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 21806681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Osseointegration of titanium implants with a roughened surface containing hydride ion in a rabbit model. Cheng Z; Zhang F; He F; Zhang L; Guo C; Zhao S; Yang G Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):e5-12. PubMed ID: 20610295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]