BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

682 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23108926)

  • 1. Differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses: factors limiting sonoelastographic strain ratio.
    Stachs A; Hartmann S; Stubert J; Dieterich M; Martin A; Kundt G; Reimer T; Gerber B
    Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 23108926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differentiation of benign from malignant nonpalpable breast masses: a comparison of computer-assisted quantification and visual assessment of lesion stiffness with the use of sonographic elastography.
    Chung SY; Moon WK; Choi JW; Cho N; Jang M; Kim KG
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Feb; 51(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 19929254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sonoelastographic strain index for differentiation of benign and malignant nonpalpable breast masses.
    Cho N; Moon WK; Kim HY; Chang JM; Park SH; Lyou CY
    J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Jan; 29(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 20040770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role and clinical usefulness of elastography in small breast masses.
    Lee JH; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Choi JJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW; Song BJ
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 21115376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnosis of solid breast lesions by elastography 5-point score and strain ratio method.
    Zhao QL; Ruan LT; Zhang H; Yin YM; Duan SX
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3245-9. PubMed ID: 22749109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
    Chang JM; Won JK; Lee KB; Park IA; Yi A; Moon WK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Aug; 201(2):W347-56. PubMed ID: 23883252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: raw data-based calculation of strain ratio.
    Fischer T; Peisker U; Fiedor S; Slowinski T; Wedemeyer P; Diekmann F; Grigoryev M; Thomas A
    Ultraschall Med; 2012 Aug; 33(4):372-9. PubMed ID: 21614749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of qualitative and semiquantitative strain elastography in breast lesions for diagnostic accuracy.
    Mutala TM; Ndaiga P; Aywak A
    Cancer Imaging; 2016 May; 16(1):12. PubMed ID: 27229478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: calculation of strain ratio in breast sonoelastography.
    Thomas A; Degenhardt F; Farrokh A; Wojcinski S; Slowinski T; Fischer T
    Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):558-63. PubMed ID: 20171905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultrasound Strain Elastography for Breast Lesions: Computer-Aided Evaluation With Quantifiable Elastographic Features.
    Xiao Y; Zeng J; Zhang X; Niu LL; Qian M; Wang CZ; Zheng HR; Zheng RQ
    J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Jun; 36(6):1089-1100. PubMed ID: 28295467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
    Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Semi-quantitative and qualitative assessment of breast ultrasound elastography in differentiating between malignant and benign lesions.
    Alhabshi SM; Rahmat K; Abdul Halim N; Aziz S; Radhika S; Gan GC; Vijayananthan A; Westerhout CJ; Mohd-Shah MN; Jaszle S; Harlina Mohd Latar N; Muhammad R
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 39(4):568-78. PubMed ID: 23384468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-assisted assessment of ultrasound real-time elastography: initial experience in 145 breast lesions.
    Zhang X; Xiao Y; Zeng J; Qiu W; Qian M; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24148563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combined Use of Ultrasound Elastography and B-Mode Sonography for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Circumscribed Breast Masses.
    Kim SY; Park JS; Koo HR
    J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1951-9. PubMed ID: 26384609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasonic elastography in breast cancer diagnosis: strain ratio vs 5-point scale.
    Zhi H; Xiao XY; Yang HY; Ou B; Wen YL; Luo BM
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1227-33. PubMed ID: 20650662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Diagnostic value of strain ratio measurement in the differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions].
    Farrokh A; Wojcinski S; Degenhardt F
    Ultraschall Med; 2011 Aug; 32(4):400-5. PubMed ID: 20425688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison and Combination of Strain and Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Masses for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions by Quantitative Assessment: Preliminary Study.
    Seo M; Ahn HS; Park SH; Lee JB; Choi BI; Sohn YM; Shin SY
    J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 28688156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer-aided analysis of ultrasound elasticity images for classification of benign and malignant breast masses.
    Moon WK; Choi JW; Cho N; Park SH; Chang JM; Jang M; Kim KG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):1460-5. PubMed ID: 21098210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ultrasound elastography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant cervical lesions.
    Lu R; Xiao Y; Liu M; Shi D
    J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Apr; 33(4):667-71. PubMed ID: 24658946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
    Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.