These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2310905)
1. Further comparisons of films, screens and cassettes for mammography. Law J; Kirkpatrick AE Br J Radiol; 1990 Feb; 63(746):128-31. PubMed ID: 2310905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Films, screens and cassettes for mammography. Law J; Kirkpatrick AE Br J Radiol; 1989 Feb; 62(734):163-7. PubMed ID: 2924096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The technical support of mammography]. Rozhkova NI; Chikirdin EG; Riudiger IuG; Kochetova GP; Lisachenko IV; Iakobs OE Med Tekh; 2000; (5):45-7. PubMed ID: 11076366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality control in mammography. Hendrick RE; Botsco M; Plott CM Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1041-57. PubMed ID: 7480654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The selection of films and intensifying screens for use as a two-dimensional detector in a computed tomography system. Truscott JG; Westmacott CF; Bentley HB; Horsman A Radiogr Today; 1988 Nov; 54(618):31-4. PubMed ID: 3269738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography. Dimakopoulou AD; Tsalafoutas IA; Georgiou EK; Yakoumakis EN Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator. Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short communication: a comparison of fine and medium screens for mammography. Burch A; Law J Br J Radiol; 1996 Feb; 69(818):182-5. PubMed ID: 8785649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does quantity of film reading affect quality? Given-Wilson R; Blanks R Clin Radiol; 2011 Feb; 66(2):97-8. PubMed ID: 21216322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimizing optical density of a Kodak mammography film-screen combination with standard-cycle processing. McParland BJ; Boyd MM; al Yousef K Br J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 71(849):950-3. PubMed ID: 10195010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiographic techniques in screen-film mammography. LaVoy TR; Huda W; Ogden KM J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2002; 3(3):248-54. PubMed ID: 12132948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of mammographic screen-film systems. Sickles EA Recent Results Cancer Res; 1987; 105():52-7. PubMed ID: 3589132 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative study of films and screens for mammography. Kirkpatrick AE; Law J Br J Radiol; 1987 Jan; 60(709):73-8. PubMed ID: 3814998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recent films and screens for mammography. Law J Br J Radiol; 1990 Dec; 63(756):966-7. PubMed ID: 2268767 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimizing techniques in screen-film mammography. Hendrick RE; Berns EA Radiol Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 38(4):701-18, viii. PubMed ID: 10943272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Reduction of radiation dosage in mammography by using film intensifying foil systems in Poland]. Iwaszkiewicz K; Bończyk J Pol Tyg Lek; 1991 Apr 22-29; 46(17-18):346-8. PubMed ID: 1669071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic quality versus patient exposure with five panoramic screen-film combinations. D'Ambrosio JA; Schiff TG; McDavid WD; Langland OE Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Apr; 61(4):409-11. PubMed ID: 3458153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]