BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23109285)

  • 1. The validity of multiple choice practical examinations as an alternative to traditional free response examination formats in gross anatomy.
    Shaibah HS; van der Vleuten CP
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 23109285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anatomy practical examinations: how does student performance on computerized evaluation compare with the traditional format?
    Inuwa IM; Taranikanti V; Al-Rawahy M; Habbal O
    Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 21916021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Blooming Anatomy Tool (BAT): A discipline-specific rubric for utilizing Bloom's taxonomy in the design and evaluation of assessments in the anatomical sciences.
    Thompson AR; O'Loughlin VD
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(6):493-501. PubMed ID: 25516150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Climbing Bloom's taxonomy pyramid: Lessons from a graduate histology course.
    Zaidi NB; Hwang C; Scott S; Stallard S; Purkiss J; Hortsch M
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Sep; 10(5):456-464. PubMed ID: 28231408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anatomy "steeplechase" online: necessity sometimes is the catalyst for innovation.
    Inuwa IM; Al Rawahy M; Taranikanti V; Habbal O
    Anat Sci Educ; 2011; 4(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 21438159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Oral anatomy laboratory examinations in a physical therapy program.
    Fabrizio PA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 23225627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Student performance on practical gross anatomy examinations is not affected by assessment modality.
    Meyer AJ; Innes SI; Stomski NJ; Armson AJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016; 9(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 25981194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of testing with multiple choice versus open-ended questions: Outcome-based observations in an anatomy course.
    Melovitz Vasan CA; DeFouw DO; Holland BK; Vasan NS
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 May; 11(3):254-261. PubMed ID: 28941215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Weekly quizzes in extended-matching format as a means of monitoring students' progress in gross anatomy.
    Lukić IK; Gluncić V; Katavić V; Petanjek Z; Jalsovec D; Marusić A
    Ann Anat; 2001 Nov; 183(6):575-9. PubMed ID: 11766531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of comprehension on performance at higher levels of Bloom's taxonomy: Findings from assessments of healthcare professional students.
    Verenna AA; Noble KA; Pearson HE; Miller SM
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Sep; 11(5):433-444. PubMed ID: 29346708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The intelligent anatomy spotter: A new approach to incorporate higher levels of Bloom's taxonomy.
    Choudhury B; Gouldsborough I; Shaw FL
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Oct; 9(5):440-5. PubMed ID: 26687931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Summative and Formative Style Anatomy Practical Examinations: Do They Have Impact on Students' Performance and Drive for Learning?
    Mogali SR; Rotgans JI; Rosby L; Ferenczi MA; Low Beer N
    Anat Sci Educ; 2020 Sep; 13(5):581-590. PubMed ID: 31733172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Equivalence of students' scores on timed and untimed anatomy practical examinations.
    Zhang G; Fenderson BA; Schmidt RR; Veloski JJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(5):281-5. PubMed ID: 23463722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of spatial anatomical knowledge with a 'three-dimensional multiple choice test' (3D-MC).
    Schubert S; Schnabel KP; Winkelmann A
    Med Teach; 2009 Jan; 31(1):e13-7. PubMed ID: 19253152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrospective analysis of prevalent anatomy spotter's examination: an educational audit.
    Tirpude AP; Gaikwad M; Tirpude PA; Jain M; Bora S
    Korean J Med Educ; 2019 Jun; 31(2):115-124. PubMed ID: 31230434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validity of multiple-choice examinations in surgery.
    Stillman RM
    Surgery; 1984 Jul; 96(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 6740501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of electronic anatomy practical examinations for remediating "at risk" students.
    Daly FJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 19927334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing a script concordance examination to a multiple-choice examination on a core internal medicine clerkship.
    Kelly W; Durning S; Denton G
    Teach Learn Med; 2012; 24(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 22775780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of student performance in multiple-choice and long essay questions in the MBBS stage I physiology examination at the University of the West Indies (Mona Campus).
    Pepple DJ; Young LE; Carroll RG
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2010 Jun; 34(2):86-9. PubMed ID: 20522902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification-Based Multiple-Choice Assessments in Anatomy can be as Reliable and Challenging as Their Free-Response Equivalents.
    Douglas-Morris J; Ritchie H; Willis C; Reed D
    Anat Sci Educ; 2021 May; 14(3):287-295. PubMed ID: 33683830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.