153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23109346)
1. Decision making for borderline cases in pass/fail clinical anatomy courses: the practical value of the standard error of measurement and likelihood ratio in a diagnostic test.
Severo M; Silva-Pereira F; Ferreira MA
Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 23109346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The practical value of the standard error of measurement in borderline pass/fail decisions.
Hays R; Gupta TS; Veitch J
Med Educ; 2008 Aug; 42(8):810-5. PubMed ID: 18564094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anatomy practical examinations: how does student performance on computerized evaluation compare with the traditional format?
Inuwa IM; Taranikanti V; Al-Rawahy M; Habbal O
Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 21916021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of electronic anatomy practical examinations for remediating "at risk" students.
Daly FJ
Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 19927334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of alternating dissection on student performance in a medical anatomy course: are dissection videos an effective substitute for actual dissection?
Granger NA; Calleson D
Clin Anat; 2007 Apr; 20(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 16795027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the reliability of a dental OSCE, using SEM: effect of different days.
Schoonheim-Klein M; Muijtjens A; Habets L; Manogue M; Van der Vleuten C; Hoogstraten J; Van der Velden U
Eur J Dent Educ; 2008 Aug; 12(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 18666893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of quality and feasibility of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in preclinical dental education.
Eberhard L; Hassel A; Bäumer A; Becker F; Beck-Mubotter J; Bömicke W; Corcodel N; Cosgarea R; Eiffler C; Giannakopoulos NN; Kraus T; Mahabadi J; Rues S; Schmitter M; Wolff D; Wege KC
Eur J Dent Educ; 2011 Aug; 15(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 21762322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence-based decision about test scoring rules in clinical anatomy multiple-choice examinations.
Severo M; Gaio AR; Povo A; Silva-Pereira F; Ferreira MA
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 25053378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of visual-spatial ability on medical students' performance in a gross anatomy course.
Lufler RS; Zumwalt AC; Romney CA; Hoagland TM
Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 22127919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Who will pass the dental OSCE? Comparison of the Angoff and the borderline regression standard setting methods.
Schoonheim-Klein M; Muijtjens A; Habets L; Manogue M; van der Vleuten C; van der Velden U
Eur J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 13(3):162-71. PubMed ID: 19630935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computerized grading of anatomy laboratory practical examinations.
Krippendorf BB; Bolender DL; Kolesari GL
Anat Sci Educ; 2008; 1(5):220-3. PubMed ID: 19177415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Oral anatomy laboratory examinations in a physical therapy program.
Fabrizio PA
Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 23225627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Equivalence of students' scores on timed and untimed anatomy practical examinations.
Zhang G; Fenderson BA; Schmidt RR; Veloski JJ
Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(5):281-5. PubMed ID: 23463722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The validity of multiple choice practical examinations as an alternative to traditional free response examination formats in gross anatomy.
Shaibah HS; van der Vleuten CP
Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 23109285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of physical therapy anatomy performance and anxiety scores in timed and untimed practical tests.
Schwartz SM; Evans C; Agur AM
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(6):518-24. PubMed ID: 25516337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The educational value of online mastery quizzes in a human anatomy course for first-year dental students.
Lee LM; Nagel RW; Gould DJ
J Dent Educ; 2012 Sep; 76(9):1195-9. PubMed ID: 22942415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance in a prematriculation gross anatomy course as a predictor of performance in medical school.
Tucker RP
Anat Sci Educ; 2008; 1(5):224-7. PubMed ID: 19177416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using checklists in a gross anatomy laboratory improves learning outcomes and dissection quality.
Hofer RE; Nikolaus OB; Pawlina W
Anat Sci Educ; 2011; 4(5):249-55. PubMed ID: 21786427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Examining the diagnostic justification abilities of fourth-year medical students.
Williams RG; Klamen DL
Acad Med; 2012 Aug; 87(8):1008-14. PubMed ID: 22722355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Objective Borderline method (OBM): a probability-based model for setting up an objective pass/fail cut-off score in medical programme assessments.
Shulruf B; Turner R; Poole P; Wilkinson T
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2013 May; 18(2):231-44. PubMed ID: 22484963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
