BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23109383)

  • 1. Computational representation of a realistic head and brain volume conductor model: electroencephalography simulation and visualization study.
    Kybartaite A
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2012 Nov; 28(11):1144-55. PubMed ID: 23109383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of head models on EEG simulations and inverse source localizations.
    Ramon C; Schimpf PH; Haueisen J
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Feb; 5():10. PubMed ID: 16466570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of head models on neuromagnetic fields and inverse source localizations.
    Ramon C; Haueisen J; Schimpf PH
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Oct; 5():55. PubMed ID: 17059601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.
    Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Head model extension for the study of bioelectric phenomena.
    Bruno P; Vatta F; Mininel S; Inchingolo P
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2003; 39():59-64. PubMed ID: 12724869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A guideline for head volume conductor modeling in EEG and MEG.
    Vorwerk J; Cho JH; Rampp S; Hamer H; Knösche TR; Wolters CH
    Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 100():590-607. PubMed ID: 24971512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of uncertainty in head tissue conductivity and complexity on EEG forward modeling in neonates.
    Azizollahi H; Aarabi A; Wallois F
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Oct; 37(10):3604-22. PubMed ID: 27238749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating cortical potentials from scalp EEG's in a realistically shaped inhomogeneous head model by means of the boundary element method.
    He B; Wang Y; Wu D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Oct; 46(10):1264-8. PubMed ID: 10513133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determination of head conductivity frequency response in vivo with optimized EIT-EEG.
    Dabek J; Kalogianni K; Rotgans E; van der Helm FCT; Kwakkel G; van Wegen EEH; Daffertshofer A; de Munck JC
    Neuroimage; 2016 Feb; 127():484-495. PubMed ID: 26589336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Modeling the effect of the layer thickness and tissue conductivities of the head and the brain on the EEG potentials using finite element method].
    Stavtsev AIu; Ushakov VL; Verkhliutov VM
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2007; 57(6):742-52. PubMed ID: 18592709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of dipole position, orientation and noise on the accuracy of EEG source localization.
    Whittingstall K; Stroink G; Gates L; Connolly JF; Finley A
    Biomed Eng Online; 2003 Jun; 2():14. PubMed ID: 12807534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improved EEG source analysis using low-resolution conductivity estimation in a four-compartment finite element head model.
    Lew S; Wolters CH; Anwander A; Makeig S; MacLeod RS
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Sep; 30(9):2862-78. PubMed ID: 19117275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of source location on the scalp potential asymmetry in a numerical model of the head.
    Abboud S; Rosenfeld M; Luzon J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Jul; 43(7):690-6. PubMed ID: 9216140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of head tissue conductivity in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models.
    Van Uitert R; Johnson C; Zhukov L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2129-37. PubMed ID: 15605860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
    Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
    Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cortical imaging on a head template: a simulation study using a resistor mesh model (RMM).
    Chauveau N; Franceries X; Aubry F; Celsis P; Rigaud B
    Brain Topogr; 2008 Sep; 21(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 18629625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The New York Head-A precise standardized volume conductor model for EEG source localization and tES targeting.
    Huang Y; Parra LC; Haufe S
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():150-62. PubMed ID: 26706450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of the isolated problem approach for multi-compartment BEM models of electro-magnetic source imaging.
    Gençer NG; Akalin-Acar Z
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3007-22. PubMed ID: 15972977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An equivalent current source model and laplacian weighted minimum norm current estimates of brain electrical activity.
    He B; Yao D; Lian J; Wu D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Apr; 49(4):277-88. PubMed ID: 11942719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of skull anisotropy for the forward and inverse problem in EEG: simulation studies using FEM on realistic head models.
    Marin G; Guerin C; Baillet S; Garnero L; Meunier G
    Hum Brain Mapp; 1998; 6(4):250-69. PubMed ID: 9704264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.