These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23110849)

  • 1. Prospective evaluation of direct approach with a tablet device as a strategy to enhance survey study participant response rate.
    Parker MJ; Manan A; Urbanski S
    BMC Res Notes; 2012 Oct; 5():605. PubMed ID: 23110849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Internet trials: participant experiences and perspectives.
    Mathieu E; Barratt A; Carter SM; Jamtvedt G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Oct; 12():162. PubMed ID: 23092116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Survey Email Scheduling and Monitoring in eRCTs (SESAMe): A Digital Tool to Improve Data Collection in Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.
    Skonnord T; Steen F; Skjeie H; Fetveit A; Brekke M; Klovning A
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Nov; 18(11):e311. PubMed ID: 27876689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving Response Rates and Representation of Hard-to-Reach Groups in Family Experience Surveys.
    Toomey SL; Elliott MN; Zaslavsky AM; Quinn J; Klein DJ; Wagner S; Thomson C; Wu M; Onorato S; Schuster MA
    Acad Pediatr; 2019; 19(4):446-453. PubMed ID: 30056223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized trial of mail and email recruitment strategies for a physician survey on clinical trial accrual.
    Murphy CC; Craddock Lee SJ; Geiger AM; Cox JV; Ahn C; Nair R; Gerber DE; Halm EA; McCallister K; Skinner CS
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):123. PubMed ID: 32429848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recruitment to a randomized web-based nutritional intervention trial: characteristics of participants compared to non-participants.
    Stopponi MA; Alexander GL; McClure JB; Carroll NM; Divine GW; Calvi JH; Rolnick SJ; Strecher VJ; Johnson CC; Ritzwoller DP
    J Med Internet Res; 2009 Aug; 11(3):e38. PubMed ID: 19709990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia.
    Mlikotic R; Parker B; Rajapakshe R
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Mar; 18(3):e70. PubMed ID: 27005707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of automated external defibrillators in cardiac arrest: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2005; 5(19):1-29. PubMed ID: 23074470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methods for Collecting Paired Observations From Emergency Medical Services and Emergency Department Providers for Pediatric Cervical Spine Injury Risk Factors.
    Ahmad FA; Schwartz H; Browne LR; Lassa-Claxton S; Wallendorf M; Brooke Lerner E; Kuppermann N; Leonard JC
    Acad Emerg Med; 2017 Apr; 24(4):432-441. PubMed ID: 27976464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Self-rated health assessed by web versus mail modes in a mixed mode survey: the digital divide effect and the genuine survey mode effect.
    Shim JM; Shin E; Johnson TP
    Med Care; 2013 Sep; 51(9):774-81. PubMed ID: 23774510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of e-mail, fax, and postal surveys of pediatricians.
    McMahon SR; Iwamoto M; Massoudi MS; Yusuf HR; Stevenson JM; David F; Chu SY; Pickering LK
    Pediatrics; 2003 Apr; 111(4 Pt 1):e299-303. PubMed ID: 12671142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. No increase in response rate by adding a web response option to a postal population survey: a randomized trial.
    Brøgger J; Nystad W; Cappelen I; Bakke P
    J Med Internet Res; 2007 Dec; 9(5):e40. PubMed ID: 18174120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do personalised e-mail invitations increase the response rates of breast cancer survivors invited to participate in a web-based behaviour change intervention? A quasi-randomised 2-arm controlled trial.
    Short CE; Rebar AL; Vandelanotte C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Aug; 15():66. PubMed ID: 26286486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Challenges of internet recruitment: a case study with disappointing results.
    Koo M; Skinner H
    J Med Internet Res; 2005 Mar; 7(1):e6. PubMed ID: 15829478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An internet-based survey method for college student drinking research.
    Kypri K; Gallagher SJ; Cashell-Smith ML
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2004 Oct; 76(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 15380288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mediators of Atherosclerosis in South Asians Living in America: Use of Web-Based Methods for Follow-Up and Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.
    Kandula NR; Puri-Taneja A; Victorson DE; Dave SS; Kanaya AM; Huffman MD
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2016 Jun; 5(2):e95. PubMed ID: 27278905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing the Impact of Mixed-Mode Designs (Mail and Web) and Multiple Contact Attempts within Mode (Mail or Web) on Clinician Survey Response.
    Beebe TJ; Jacobson RM; Jenkins SM; Lackore KA; Rutten LJF
    Health Serv Res; 2018 Aug; 53 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):3070-3083. PubMed ID: 29355920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response rate and completeness of questionnaires: a randomized study of Internet versus paper-and-pencil versions.
    Kongsved SM; Basnov M; Holm-Christensen K; Hjollund NH
    J Med Internet Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):e25. PubMed ID: 17942387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role of health plan administrative claims data in participant recruitment for pragmatic clinical trials: An Aspirin Dosing: A Patient-centric Trial Assessing Benefits and Long-term Effectiveness (ADAPTABLE) example.
    Shi Q; Shambhu S; Marshall A; Rose-Kennedy E; Robertson H; Paullin M; Jones WS; Cziraky M; Haynes K
    Clin Trials; 2020 Apr; 17(2):212-222. PubMed ID: 32009464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reaching young adult smokers through the internet: comparison of three recruitment mechanisms.
    Ramo DE; Hall SM; Prochaska JJ
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2010 Jul; 12(7):768-75. PubMed ID: 20530194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.