These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

457 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23111050)

  • 1. The surgical residency interview: a candidate-centered, working approach.
    Seabott H; Smith RK; Alseidi A; Thirlby RC
    J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(6):802-6. PubMed ID: 23111050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determining personal talents and behavioral styles of applicants to surgical training: a new look at an old problem, part I.
    Bell RM; Fann SA; Morrison JE; Lisk JR
    J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(6):534-41. PubMed ID: 22000541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emergency medicine residency applicant views on the interview day process.
    Deiorio NM; Yarris LM; Gaines SA
    Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Dec; 16 Suppl 2():S67-70. PubMed ID: 20053215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Applicant Characteristics Associated With Selection for Ranking at Independent Surgery Residency Programs.
    Dort JM; Trickey AW; Kallies KJ; Joshi AR; Sidwell RA; Jarman BT
    J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(6):e123-9. PubMed ID: 26073713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. It was the night before the interview: perceptions of resident applicants about the preinterview reception.
    Schlitzkus LL; Schenarts PJ; Schenarts KD
    J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(6):750-7. PubMed ID: 24209651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The assessment of emotional intelligence among candidates interviewing for general surgery residency.
    Lin DT; Kannappan A; Lau JN
    J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(4):514-21. PubMed ID: 23725940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Application Process: An Analysis of the Applicant Experience.
    Ramkumar PN; Navarro SM; Chughtai M; Haeberle HS; Taylor SA; Mont MA
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2018 Aug; 26(15):537-544. PubMed ID: 29870416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A formal reception improves orthopaedic surgery residency program applicant perceptions of the interview experience.
    Lantry JM; Nyland JA; Perkins DR; Roberts CS
    J Ky Med Assoc; 2008 Apr; 106(4):177-81. PubMed ID: 18478847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomized evaluation of a web based interview process for urology resident selection.
    Shah SK; Arora S; Skipper B; Kalishman S; Timm TC; Smith AY
    J Urol; 2012 Apr; 187(4):1380-4. PubMed ID: 22341282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Importance of the faculty interview during the resident application process.
    Brothers TE; Wetherholt S
    J Surg Educ; 2007; 64(6):378-85. PubMed ID: 18063273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resident selection criteria for advanced education in prosthodontic programs: program directors' perspective.
    Yuan JC; Lee DJ; Knoernschild KL; Campbell SD; Sukotjo C
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Jun; 19(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 20210858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of moral reasoning skills in the orthopaedic surgery resident applicant.
    Bohm KC; Van Heest T; Gioe TJ; Agel J; Johnson TC; Van Heest A
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Sep; 96(17):e151. PubMed ID: 25187595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A survey of demographics, motivations, and backgrounds among applicants to the integrated 0 + 5 vascular surgery residency.
    Lee JT; Teshome M; de Virgilio C; Ishaque B; Qiu M; Dalman RL
    J Vasc Surg; 2010 Feb; 51(2):496-502; discussion 502-3. PubMed ID: 20022205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application submission date reflects applicant quality.
    Fuhrman GM; Dada S; Ehleben C
    J Surg Educ; 2008; 65(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 19059168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Utilization of a Novel Program-Specific Evaluation Tool Results in a Decidedly Different Interview Pool Than Traditional Application Review.
    Lyons J; Bingmer K; Ammori J; Marks J
    J Surg Educ; 2019; 76(6):e110-e117. PubMed ID: 31668694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The predictive value of application variables on the global rating of applicants to a general surgery residency program.
    Sharp C; Plank A; Dove J; Woll N; Hunsinger M; Morgan A; Blansfield J; Shabahang M
    J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(1):148-55. PubMed ID: 25091382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Canadian Urology Fair: a model for minimizing the financial and academic costs of the residency selection process.
    Grober ED; Matsumoto ED; Jewett MA; Chin JL;
    Can J Surg; 2003 Dec; 46(6):458-62. PubMed ID: 14680354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Applicants' opinions about the selection process for oral and maxillofacial surgery programs.
    Marciani RD; Smith TA; Heaton LJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 May; 61(5):608-14. PubMed ID: 12730841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use and utility of Web-based residency program information: a survey of residency applicants.
    Embi PJ; Desai S; Cooney TG
    J Med Internet Res; 2003; 5(3):e22. PubMed ID: 14517113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. General surgery applicant perspectives: Two years of virtual interview experiences and supplemental application impressions.
    Quinn KM; Runge LT; Parrado RH; White JA; Talley CL; Streck CJ; Abbott AM
    Am J Surg; 2024 Jun; 232():26-30. PubMed ID: 38042720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.