456 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23111050)
1. The surgical residency interview: a candidate-centered, working approach.
Seabott H; Smith RK; Alseidi A; Thirlby RC
J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(6):802-6. PubMed ID: 23111050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determining personal talents and behavioral styles of applicants to surgical training: a new look at an old problem, part I.
Bell RM; Fann SA; Morrison JE; Lisk JR
J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(6):534-41. PubMed ID: 22000541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Emergency medicine residency applicant views on the interview day process.
Deiorio NM; Yarris LM; Gaines SA
Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Dec; 16 Suppl 2():S67-70. PubMed ID: 20053215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Applicant Characteristics Associated With Selection for Ranking at Independent Surgery Residency Programs.
Dort JM; Trickey AW; Kallies KJ; Joshi AR; Sidwell RA; Jarman BT
J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(6):e123-9. PubMed ID: 26073713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. It was the night before the interview: perceptions of resident applicants about the preinterview reception.
Schlitzkus LL; Schenarts PJ; Schenarts KD
J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(6):750-7. PubMed ID: 24209651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The assessment of emotional intelligence among candidates interviewing for general surgery residency.
Lin DT; Kannappan A; Lau JN
J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(4):514-21. PubMed ID: 23725940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Application Process: An Analysis of the Applicant Experience.
Ramkumar PN; Navarro SM; Chughtai M; Haeberle HS; Taylor SA; Mont MA
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2018 Aug; 26(15):537-544. PubMed ID: 29870416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A formal reception improves orthopaedic surgery residency program applicant perceptions of the interview experience.
Lantry JM; Nyland JA; Perkins DR; Roberts CS
J Ky Med Assoc; 2008 Apr; 106(4):177-81. PubMed ID: 18478847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized evaluation of a web based interview process for urology resident selection.
Shah SK; Arora S; Skipper B; Kalishman S; Timm TC; Smith AY
J Urol; 2012 Apr; 187(4):1380-4. PubMed ID: 22341282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Importance of the faculty interview during the resident application process.
Brothers TE; Wetherholt S
J Surg Educ; 2007; 64(6):378-85. PubMed ID: 18063273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Resident selection criteria for advanced education in prosthodontic programs: program directors' perspective.
Yuan JC; Lee DJ; Knoernschild KL; Campbell SD; Sukotjo C
J Prosthodont; 2010 Jun; 19(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 20210858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of moral reasoning skills in the orthopaedic surgery resident applicant.
Bohm KC; Van Heest T; Gioe TJ; Agel J; Johnson TC; Van Heest A
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Sep; 96(17):e151. PubMed ID: 25187595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A survey of demographics, motivations, and backgrounds among applicants to the integrated 0 + 5 vascular surgery residency.
Lee JT; Teshome M; de Virgilio C; Ishaque B; Qiu M; Dalman RL
J Vasc Surg; 2010 Feb; 51(2):496-502; discussion 502-3. PubMed ID: 20022205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application submission date reflects applicant quality.
Fuhrman GM; Dada S; Ehleben C
J Surg Educ; 2008; 65(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 19059168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Utilization of a Novel Program-Specific Evaluation Tool Results in a Decidedly Different Interview Pool Than Traditional Application Review.
Lyons J; Bingmer K; Ammori J; Marks J
J Surg Educ; 2019; 76(6):e110-e117. PubMed ID: 31668694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The predictive value of application variables on the global rating of applicants to a general surgery residency program.
Sharp C; Plank A; Dove J; Woll N; Hunsinger M; Morgan A; Blansfield J; Shabahang M
J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(1):148-55. PubMed ID: 25091382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Canadian Urology Fair: a model for minimizing the financial and academic costs of the residency selection process.
Grober ED; Matsumoto ED; Jewett MA; Chin JL;
Can J Surg; 2003 Dec; 46(6):458-62. PubMed ID: 14680354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Applicants' opinions about the selection process for oral and maxillofacial surgery programs.
Marciani RD; Smith TA; Heaton LJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 May; 61(5):608-14. PubMed ID: 12730841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use and utility of Web-based residency program information: a survey of residency applicants.
Embi PJ; Desai S; Cooney TG
J Med Internet Res; 2003; 5(3):e22. PubMed ID: 14517113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. General surgery applicant perspectives: Two years of virtual interview experiences and supplemental application impressions.
Quinn KM; Runge LT; Parrado RH; White JA; Talley CL; Streck CJ; Abbott AM
Am J Surg; 2024 Jun; 232():26-30. PubMed ID: 38042720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
