173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23111061)
1. A comparison of the Actigraph GT1M and GT3X accelerometers under standardized and free-living conditions.
Kaminsky LA; Ozemek C
Physiol Meas; 2012 Nov; 33(11):1869-76. PubMed ID: 23111061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors in persons with multiple sclerosis and controls.
Sandroff BM; Motl RW
Disabil Rehabil; 2013 May; 35(9):725-31. PubMed ID: 23557239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of ActiGraph's low-frequency filter in laboratory and free-living environments.
Feito Y; Garner HR; Bassett DR
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Jan; 47(1):211-7. PubMed ID: 24870583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of two ActiGraph accelerometer generations in the assessment of physical activity in free living conditions.
Vanhelst J; Mikulovic J; Bui-Xuan G; Dieu O; Blondeau T; Fardy P; Béghin L
BMC Res Notes; 2012 Apr; 5():187. PubMed ID: 22534207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity of the ActiGraph GT1M during walking and cycling.
Herman Hansen B; Børtnes I; Hildebrand M; Holme I; Kolle E; Anderssen SA
J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(6):510-6. PubMed ID: 24117333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of three models of actigraph accelerometers during free living and controlled laboratory conditions.
Lee KY; Macfarlane DJ; Cerin E
Eur J Sport Sci; 2013; 13(3):332-9. PubMed ID: 23679150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accelerometer measured daily physical activity and sedentary pursuits--comparison between two models of the Actigraph and the importance of data reduction.
Tanha T; Tornberg Å; Dencker M; Wollmer P
BMC Res Notes; 2013 Oct; 6():439. PubMed ID: 24176143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Actigraph GT3X: validation and determination of physical activity intensity cut points.
Santos-Lozano A; Santín-Medeiros F; Cardon G; Torres-Luque G; Bailón R; Bergmeir C; Ruiz JR; Lucia A; Garatachea N
Int J Sports Med; 2013 Nov; 34(11):975-82. PubMed ID: 23700330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Head-to-head comparison between Actigraph 7164 and GT1M accelerometers in adolescents.
Tanha T; Tornberg ÅB; Wollmer P; Dencker M
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2013 Mar; 33(2):162-5. PubMed ID: 23383695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring reliability and validity of the ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer for children with cerebral palsy: a feasibility study.
O'Neil ME; Fragala-Pinkham MA; Forman JL; Trost SG
J Pediatr Rehabil Med; 2014; 7(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 25260506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of the GT3X ActiGraph in children and comparison with the GT1M ActiGraph.
Hänggi JM; Phillips LR; Rowlands AV
J Sci Med Sport; 2013 Jan; 16(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 22749938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of activity monitors in controlled and free-living environments.
Feito Y; Bassett DR; Thompson DL
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Apr; 44(4):733-41. PubMed ID: 21904249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ActiGraph GT3X+ cut-points for identifying sedentary behaviour in older adults in free-living environments.
Aguilar-Farías N; Brown WJ; Peeters GM
J Sci Med Sport; 2014 May; 17(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 23932934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity of actigraphs uniaxial and triaxial accelerometers for assessment of physical activity in adults in laboratory conditions.
Kelly LA; McMillan DG; Anderson A; Fippinger M; Fillerup G; Rider J
BMC Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 13(1):5. PubMed ID: 24279826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of the Actigraph GT3X+ Accelerometer in Adults under Free-Living Conditions.
Aadland E; Ylvisåker E
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134606. PubMed ID: 26274586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative interinstrument reliability of uniaxial and triaxial accelerometers in free-living conditions.
Vanhelst J; Baquet G; Gottrand F; Béghin L
Percept Mot Skills; 2012 Apr; 114(2):584-94. PubMed ID: 22755462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors.
Sasaki JE; John D; Freedson PS
J Sci Med Sport; 2011 Sep; 14(5):411-6. PubMed ID: 21616714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of four ActiGraph accelerometers during walking and running.
John D; Tyo B; Bassett DR
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2010 Feb; 42(2):368-74. PubMed ID: 19927022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Not Available].
Santos-Lozano A; Santín-Medeiros F; Cristi-Montero C; Jaén-Jiménez R; Casajús JA; Garatachea N
Nutr Hosp; 2016 Jun; 33(3):280. PubMed ID: 27513507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Actigraph accelerometer interinstrument reliability during free-living in adults.
McClain JJ; Sisson SB; Tudor-Locke C
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2007 Sep; 39(9):1509-14. PubMed ID: 17805082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
