These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23111523)

  • 21. PERFORMANCE OF THE VARSKIN 5 (v5.3) ELECTRON DOSIMETRY MODEL.
    Anspach LJ; Hamby DM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Oct; 181(2):111-119. PubMed ID: 29378064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.
    Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M
    Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Monte Carlo simulations of the photon calibration fields at the underground laboratory of PTB.
    Kowatari M; Dombrowski H; Neumaier S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Dec; 142(2-4):125-35. PubMed ID: 20924123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Simple analytical expressions for the dose of point photon sources in homogeneous media.
    Sabariego MP; Porras I; Lallena AM
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(21):6113-28. PubMed ID: 18854613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of PENFAST--a fast Monte Carlo code for dose calculations in photon and electron radiotherapy treatment planning.
    Habib B; Poumarede B; Tola F; Barthe J
    Phys Med; 2010 Jan; 26(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 19342258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An investigation of voxel geometries for MCNP-based radiation dose calculations.
    Zhang J; Bednarz B; Xu XG
    Health Phys; 2006 Nov; 91(5 Suppl):S59-65. PubMed ID: 17023800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. MCNPX alpha particle dose estimate to the skin tissue from a low-enriched uranium fuel fragment.
    Atanackovic J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jun; 150(2):223-30. PubMed ID: 22003183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Simulation study on potential accuracy gains from dual energy CT tissue segmentation for low-energy brachytherapy Monte Carlo dose calculations.
    Landry G; Granton PV; Reniers B; Ollers MC; Beaulieu L; Wildberger JE; Verhaegen F
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6257-78. PubMed ID: 21896967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison between effective doses for voxel-based and stylized exposure models from photon and electron irradiation.
    Kramer R; Khoury HJ; Vieira JW
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(21):5105-26. PubMed ID: 16237244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dose to tissue medium or water cavities as surrogate for the dose to cell nuclei at brachytherapy photon energies.
    Enger SA; Ahnesjö A; Verhaegen F; Beaulieu L
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jul; 57(14):4489-500. PubMed ID: 22722477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Calculation of absorbed dose ratios using correlated Monte Carlo sampling.
    Ma CM; Nahum AE
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(4):1189-99. PubMed ID: 8413029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Groundshine dose-rate conversion factors of soil contaminated to different depths.
    Yoo SJ; Lee JK; Kim EH; Jeong KH; Cho G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Dec; 157(3):407-29. PubMed ID: 23765073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. SU-D-218-06: Acceleration of Optical Photon Monte Carlo Simulations Using the Macro Monte Carlo Method.
    Jacqmin D
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part3):3623. PubMed ID: 28517426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Selection of an appropriate air kerma rate constant for 75Se sources.
    H Currier B; Munro JJ; Medich DC
    Health Phys; 2013 May; 104(5):511-6. PubMed ID: 23532080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparing dose rates near a radioactive patient evaluated using various source models: point, line, cylinder, and anthropomorphic phantoms.
    Liu YC; Lee KW; Sheu RJ
    Health Phys; 2015 Jul; 109(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 26011499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Monte Carlo calculation of dose rate conversion factors for external exposure to photon emitters in soil.
    Clouvas A; Xanthos S; Antonopoulos-Domis M; Silva J
    Health Phys; 2000 Mar; 78(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 10688452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. CALCULATION OF SKIN DOSE DUE TO BETA CONTAMINATION USING THE NEW QUANTITY OF THE ICRP 116: THE 'LOCAL SKIN DOSE'.
    Bourgois L; Ménard S; Comte N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Nov; 176(4):365-379. PubMed ID: 28338860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Skin dose contamination conversion coefficients. Benchmark with three simulation codes.
    Frosio T; Bertreix P; Menaa N; Thomas S; Eberhardt H; Endres J
    J Radiol Prot; 2022 Jan; 42(1):. PubMed ID: 34801994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Calculation of fluence and absorbed dose in head tissues due to different photon energies.
    Azorín C; Vega-Carrillo HR; Rivera T; Azorín J
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2014 Jan; 83 Pt C():230-4. PubMed ID: 24268397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. New electron backscatter correction factors for accurate skin depth dose calculation from skin contamination by hot particles.
    Chibani O
    Health Phys; 2001 Oct; 81(4):419-25. PubMed ID: 11569636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.