175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23111713)
1. Implementing the electronic medical record: building on success.
Tillett J
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2012; 26(4):284-5. PubMed ID: 23111713
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. EMR: one hospital that got it right.
Health Manag Technol; 2009 Aug; 30(8):14-7. PubMed ID: 19697542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of a clinical operations analyst in implementing a successful electronic medical record.
Rimmerman C; Heidenreich D; Appel D
Physician Exec; 2009; 35(6):34-9. PubMed ID: 19999690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The electronic medical record in dermatology.
Grosshandler JA; Tulbert B; Kaufmann MD; Bhatia A; Brodell RT
Arch Dermatol; 2010 Sep; 146(9):1031-6. PubMed ID: 20855707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electronic health records, the PINNACLE registry, and quality care.
Oetgen WJ; Mullen JB; Mirro MJ
Arch Intern Med; 2011 May; 171(10):953-4; author reply 954. PubMed ID: 21606108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Implications of an emerging EHR monoculture for hospitals and healthcare systems.
Koppel R; Lehmann CU
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Mar; 22(2):465-71. PubMed ID: 25342181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using monitoring and controlling in an electronic health record module upgrade: a case study.
Cortelyou-Ward K; Yniguez R
Health Care Manag (Frederick); 2011; 30(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 21808175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Addressing EMR (electronic medical record) issues head-on.
Streveler DJ
Healthc Inform; 1994 Sep; 11(9):68. PubMed ID: 10137341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Systems integration. The electronic records linchpin.
Gillespie G
Health Data Manag; 2005 May; 13(5):34-6, 38, 40 passim. PubMed ID: 15962537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Internet reroutes electronic records.
McCormack J
Health Data Manag; 2000 May; 8(5):50-1, 54-6, 58-62. PubMed ID: 11183069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Transforming patient and family access to medical information: utilisation patterns of a patient-accessible electronic health record.
Burke RP; Rossi AF; Wilner BR; Hannan RL; Zabinsky JA; White JA
Cardiol Young; 2010 Oct; 20(5):477-84. PubMed ID: 20456816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Benchmarking electronic medical record adoption.
McCartney PR
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2010; 35(6):358. PubMed ID: 20975396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The five levels of the ultimate electronic health record.
Waegemann CP
Healthc Inform; 1995 Nov; 12(11):26, 28, 32-5. PubMed ID: 10152715
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Electronic health records.
Stead WW
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 153():119-43. PubMed ID: 20543242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EHRs and health care quality: correlation with out-of-date, differently purposed data does not equate with causality.
Mohan V; Hersh WR
Arch Intern Med; 2011 May; 171(10):952-3. PubMed ID: 21606107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. CEN EN13606 normalisation framework implementation experiences.
Moner D; Maldonado JA; Boscá D; Angulo C; Robles M; Pérez D; Serrano P
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 155():136-42. PubMed ID: 20543321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Maryland Health Care Commission electronic medical records--a growing alternative to paper charts.
Sharp D
Md Med; 2004; 5(3):36-8. PubMed ID: 15495858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Interoperability--making information systems work together.
Fetter MS
Issues Ment Health Nurs; 2009 Jul; 30(7):470-2. PubMed ID: 19544132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Documenting Patient Care in EHRs.
Berlin J
Tex Med; 2015 Jul; 111(7):53-8. PubMed ID: 26201069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. SHARE: bridging the interoperability gap between EHRs.
Williams CS
J Ark Med Soc; 2013 Oct; 110(5):84-5. PubMed ID: 24383195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
