These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23111753)

  • 1. Benchmarks for 0-0 transitions of aromatic organic molecules: DFT/B3LYP, ADC(2), CC2, SOS-CC2 and SCS-CC2 compared to high-resolution gas-phase data.
    Winter NO; Graf NK; Leutwyler S; Hättig C
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2013 May; 15(18):6623-30. PubMed ID: 23111753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vibrational frequency scaling factors for correlation consistent basis sets and the methods CC2 and MP2 and their spin-scaled SCS and SOS variants.
    Friese DH; Törk L; Hättig C
    J Chem Phys; 2014 Nov; 141(19):194106. PubMed ID: 25416873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 0-0 Energies Using Hybrid Schemes: Benchmarks of TD-DFT, CIS(D), ADC(2), CC2, and BSE/GW formalisms for 80 Real-Life Compounds.
    Jacquemin D; Duchemin I; Blase X
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Nov; 11(11):5340-59. PubMed ID: 26574326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Benchmarks for electronically excited states: CASPT2, CC2, CCSD, and CC3.
    Schreiber M; Silva-Junior MR; Sauer SP; Thiel W
    J Chem Phys; 2008 Apr; 128(13):134110. PubMed ID: 18397056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing Excited State Methods by Adiabatic Excitation Energies.
    Send R; Kühn M; Furche F
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2011 Aug; 7(8):2376-86. PubMed ID: 26606613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benchmarking the performance of spin-component scaled CC2 in ground and electronically excited states.
    Hellweg A; Grün SA; Hättig C
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2008 Jul; 10(28):4119-27. PubMed ID: 18612515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Theoretical thermodynamics for large molecules: walking the thin line between accuracy and computational cost.
    Schwabe T; Grimme S
    Acc Chem Res; 2008 Apr; 41(4):569-79. PubMed ID: 18324790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coupled-cluster studies of the electronic excitation spectra of silanes.
    Lehtonen O; Sundholm D
    J Chem Phys; 2006 Oct; 125(14):144314. PubMed ID: 17042597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benchmarking the Approximate Second-Order Coupled-Cluster Method on Biochromophores.
    Send R; Kaila VR; Sundholm D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2011 Aug; 7(8):2473-84. PubMed ID: 26606621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benchmarks of electronically excited states: basis set effects on CASPT2 results.
    Silva-Junior MR; Schreiber M; Sauer SP; Thiel W
    J Chem Phys; 2010 Nov; 133(17):174318. PubMed ID: 21054043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How method-dependent are calculated differences between vertical, adiabatic, and 0-0 excitation energies?
    Fang C; Oruganti B; Durbeej B
    J Phys Chem A; 2014 Jun; 118(23):4157-71. PubMed ID: 24848558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benchmarking Correlated Methods for Frequency-Dependent Polarizabilities: Aromatic Molecules with the CC3, CCSD, CC2, SOPPA, SOPPA(CC2), and SOPPA(CCSD) Methods.
    Jørgensen MW; Faber R; Ligabue A; Sauer SPA
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 May; 16(5):3006-3018. PubMed ID: 32302474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accurate calculation of the heats of formation for large main group compounds with spin-component scaled MP2 methods.
    Grimme S
    J Phys Chem A; 2005 Apr; 109(13):3067-77. PubMed ID: 16833631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Density functional theory calculations of the lowest energy quintet and triplet states of model hemes: role of functional, basis set, and zero-point energy corrections.
    Khvostichenko D; Choi A; Boulatov R
    J Phys Chem A; 2008 Apr; 112(16):3700-11. PubMed ID: 18348545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calculations on noncovalent interactions and databases of benchmark interaction energies.
    Hobza P
    Acc Chem Res; 2012 Apr; 45(4):663-72. PubMed ID: 22225511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scaled opposite-spin CC2 for ground and excited states with fourth order scaling computational costs.
    Winter NO; Hättig C
    J Chem Phys; 2011 May; 134(18):184101. PubMed ID: 21568491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New SCS- and SOS-MP2 Coefficients Fitted to Semi-Coulombic Systems.
    Rigby J; Izgorodina EI
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2014 Aug; 10(8):3111-22. PubMed ID: 26588282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coupled-cluster calculations of the lowest 0-0 bands of the electronic excitation spectrum of naphthalene.
    Fliegl H; Sundholm D
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2014 Jun; 16(21):9859-65. PubMed ID: 24406689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cross-Comparisons between Experiment, TD-DFT, CC, and ADC for Transition Energies.
    Suellen C; Freitas RG; Loos PF; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Aug; 15(8):4581-4590. PubMed ID: 31265781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benchmarking TD-DFT and Wave Function Methods for Oscillator Strengths and Excited-State Dipole Moments.
    Sarkar R; Boggio-Pasqua M; Loos PF; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Feb; 17(2):1117-1132. PubMed ID: 33492950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.