BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23112016)

  • 1. Maternal and perinatal morbidity after Caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation.
    Radha P; Tagore S; Rahman MF; Tee J
    Singapore Med J; 2012 Oct; 53(10):655-8. PubMed ID: 23112016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes following caesarean section in second versus first stage of labour in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria.
    Rabiu KA; Adewunmi AA; Akinola OI; Eti AE; Tayo AO
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2011 Sep; 18(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 21909144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maternal and infant outcome after caesarean section without recorded medical indication: findings from a Swedish case-control study.
    Karlström A; Lindgren H; Hildingsson I
    BJOG; 2013 Mar; 120(4):479-86; discussion 486. PubMed ID: 23316937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation versus caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour: comparison of maternal and perinatal morbidity.
    Selo-Ojeme D; Sathiyathasan S; Fayyaz M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Sep; 278(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 18189142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rising rates of caesarean deliveries at full cervical dilatation: a concerning trend.
    Unterscheider J; McMenamin M; Cullinane F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Aug; 157(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 21470764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk of maternal and neonatal complications in subsequent pregnancy after planned caesarean section in a first birth, compared with emergency caesarean section: a nationwide comparative cohort study.
    Kok N; Ruiter L; Hof M; Ravelli A; Mol BW; Pajkrt E; Kazemier B
    BJOG; 2014 Jan; 121(2):216-23. PubMed ID: 24373595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor.
    Alexander JM; Leveno KJ; Rouse DJ; Landon MB; Gilbert S; Spong CY; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Gabbe SG;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):917-21. PubMed ID: 17400854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maternal and neonatal morbidity of emergency caesarean sections with a decision-to-delivery interval under 30 minutes: evidence from 10 years.
    Hillemanns P; Hasbargen U; Strauss A; Schulze A; Genzel-Boroviczeny O; Hepp H
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2003 Aug; 268(3):136-41. PubMed ID: 12883825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maternal and perinatal morbidity of caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation compared with caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour.
    Allen VM; O'Connell CM; Baskett TF
    BJOG; 2005 Jul; 112(7):986-90. PubMed ID: 15958005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uterine rupture after induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section.
    Kayani SI; Alfirevic Z
    BJOG; 2005 Apr; 112(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 15777443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Symphysiotomy or caesarean section after failed trial of assisted delivery.
    Mola GD
    P N G Med J; 1995 Sep; 38(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 9522856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Uterine rupture: risk factors, maternal and perinatal complications].
    Guyot A; Carbonnel M; Frey C; Pharisien I; Uzan M; Carbillon L
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2010 May; 39(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 20392573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trends, risk factors and pregnancy outcome in women with uterine rupture.
    Ronel D; Wiznitzer A; Sergienko R; Zlotnik A; Sheiner E
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Feb; 285(2):317-21. PubMed ID: 21735183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The decision delivery interval in emergency caesarean section and its associated maternal and fetal outcomes at a referral hospital in northern Tanzania: a cross-sectional study.
    Hirani BA; Mchome BL; Mazuguni NS; Mahande MJ
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Dec; 17(1):411. PubMed ID: 29212457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vaginal birth after one previous caesarean section in a tertiary institution in Nigeria.
    Aisien AO; Oronsaye AU
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Nov; 24(8):886-90. PubMed ID: 16147643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decision - delivery interval and perinatal outcome in emergency caesarean sections.
    Onah HE; Ibeziako N; Umezulike AC; Effetie ER; Ogbuokiri CM
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 May; 25(4):342-6. PubMed ID: 16091313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uterine rupture and subsequent pregnancy outcome--how safe is it? A 25-year study.
    Chibber R; El-Saleh E; Al Fadhli R; Al Jassar W; Al Harmi J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 May; 23(5):421-4. PubMed ID: 20230321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery: predicting success, risks of failure.
    Durnwald C; Mercer B
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Jun; 15(6):388-93. PubMed ID: 15280110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk factors for uterine rupture and neonatal consequences of uterine rupture: a population-based study of successive pregnancies in Sweden.
    Kaczmarczyk M; Sparén P; Terry P; Cnattingius S
    BJOG; 2007 Oct; 114(10):1208-14. PubMed ID: 17877673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does miscarriage in an initial pregnancy lead to adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in the next continuing pregnancy?
    Bhattacharya S; Townend J; Shetty A; Campbell D; Bhattacharya S
    BJOG; 2008 Dec; 115(13):1623-9. PubMed ID: 18947339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.