These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23112941)

  • 1. Evaluation of mandibular cortical bone thickness for placement of temporary anchorage devices (TADs).
    Kim JH; Park YC
    Korean J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 42(3):110-7. PubMed ID: 23112941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites.
    Farnsworth D; Rossouw PE; Ceen RF; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 21457860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age-related changes in maxillary and mandibular cortical bone thickness in relation to temporary anchorage device placement.
    Sathapana S; Forrest A; Monsour P; Naser-ud-Din S
    Aust Dent J; 2013 Mar; 58(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 23441794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CBCT assessment of bone thickness in maxillary and mandibular teeth: an anatomic study.
    Porto OCL; Silva BSF; Silva JA; Estrela CRA; Alencar AHG; Bueno MDR; Estrela C
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2020; 28():e20190148. PubMed ID: 32049133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Caudal Mandibular Bone Height and Buccal Cortical Bone Thickness Measured by Computed Tomography in Healthy Dogs.
    Snyder CJ; Soukup JW; Drees R; Tabone TJ
    Vet Surg; 2016 Jan; 45(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 26382250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults.
    Park J; Cho HJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):314.e1-12; discussion 314-5. PubMed ID: 19732658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants.
    Deguchi T; Nasu M; Murakami K; Yabuuchi T; Kamioka H; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):721.e7-12. PubMed ID: 16769488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The thickness of alveolar bone at the mandibular canine and premolar teeth in normal occlusion.
    Park JB; Lee JE; Kim K; Yoo JT; Kim Y; Kook YA; Ko Y
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 May; 25(3):1115-9. PubMed ID: 24769616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bone and cortical bone thickness of mandibular buccal shelf for mini-screw insertion in adults.
    Nucera R; Lo Giudice A; Bellocchio AM; Spinuzza P; Caprioglio A; Perillo L; Matarese G; Cordasco G
    Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):745-751. PubMed ID: 28598220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The current overview of the devices of temporary anchorage placed on the palatal bone: CBCT study.
    Kotan S; Koç A; Öner Talmaç AG
    Odontology; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38564121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of the third molar presence on the thickness and height of the buccal cortical bone of the mandibular first and second molars.
    Pinheiro PM; Freitas KM; de Castro RC
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2023 Jun; 15(6):e478-e487. PubMed ID: 37388434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional evaluation of the location of the mandibular canal using cone-beam computed tomography for orthodontic anchorage devices.
    Uchida Y; Motoyoshi M; Namura Y; Shimizu N
    J Oral Sci; 2017; 59(2):257-262. PubMed ID: 28637985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Anthropometric analysis of the mandible morphology in young females with different vertical skeletal pattern].
    Xie Z; Li G; Guo J
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 30(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 22768772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment and Correlation of Variation in Lingual Cortical Plate Thickness with Different Angulations of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography in North Indian Population.
    Gumber TK; Kandiara P; Bhullar RS; Dhawan A; Kapila S; Singh B
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2023 Sep; 22(3):590-602. PubMed ID: 37534344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Qualitative and morphological evaluation of the mandibular bone using computed tomography.
    Priyadarshini SR; Sahoo PK; Niyogi S; Patnaik S; Bhuyan SK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(6):899-903. PubMed ID: 33753661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Thickness of Buccal and Lingual Alveolar Bone Plates according to the Position of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans.
    Parhiz SA; Bakhtiary P; Mosavat F; Kharazifard MJ
    Front Dent; 2019; 16(4):279-289. PubMed ID: 32342057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mandibular Canal Location: Cone-beam Computed Tomography Examination.
    Koivisto T; Chiona D; Milroy LL; McClanahan SB; Ahmad M; Bowles WR
    J Endod; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1018-21. PubMed ID: 27178249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A study of the internal structure of the Japanese edentulous mandible].
    Kondou J
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1990 Oct; 90(10):1251-77. PubMed ID: 2135088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tomographic mapping of mandibular interradicular spaces for placement of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Monnerat C; Restle L; Mucha JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):428.e1-9; discussion 428-9. PubMed ID: 19361724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Three-dimensional survey of the whole mandibular canal and mandibular morphology by cone beam computed tomography in normal young people].
    Sheng L; Qu W; Li Y; Qu Z; Wang J
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Apr; 34(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 27337924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.