149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23114025)
1. Comparison of approaches to estimate confidence intervals of post-test probabilities of diagnostic test results in a nested case-control study.
van Zaane B; Vergouwe Y; Donders AR; Moons KG
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Oct; 12():166. PubMed ID: 23114025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Confidence intervals for predictive values with an emphasis to case-control studies.
Mercaldo ND; Lau KF; Zhou XH
Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(10):2170-83. PubMed ID: 16927452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assess predictive values of a binary diagnostic test under a nested case-control design.
Wu Y
J Biopharm Stat; 2022 Mar; 32(2):219-229. PubMed ID: 34546838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies using integrated nested Laplace approximations.
Paul M; Riebler A; Bachmann LM; Rue H; Held L
Stat Med; 2010 May; 29(12):1325-39. PubMed ID: 20101670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Confidence intervals construction for difference of two means with incomplete correlated data.
Li HQ; Tang NS; Yi JY
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Mar; 16():31. PubMed ID: 26969507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A GEE approach to estimating accuracy and its confidence intervals for correlated data.
Lim Y
Pharm Stat; 2020 Jan; 19(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 31448536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A modified Wald interval for the area under the ROC curve (AUC) in diagnostic case-control studies.
Kottas M; Kuss O; Zapf A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Feb; 14():26. PubMed ID: 24552686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imputation approaches for estimating diagnostic accuracy for multiple tests from partially verified designs.
Albert PS
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):947-57. PubMed ID: 17825024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combination of the weighted kappa coefficients of two binary diagnostic tests.
Roldán-Nofuentes JA; Amro RM
J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(5):909-926. PubMed ID: 29172996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bootstrap confidence intervals for the sensitivity of a quantitative diagnostic test.
Platt RW; Hanley JA; Yang H
Stat Med; 2000 Feb; 19(3):313-22. PubMed ID: 10649298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved confidence intervals for the sensitivity at a fixed level of specificity of a continuous-scale diagnostic test.
Zhou XH; Qin G
Stat Med; 2005 Feb; 24(3):465-77. PubMed ID: 15635678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Approximate confidence intervals for the likelihood ratios of a binary diagnostic test in the presence of partial disease verification.
Montero-Alonso MA; Roldán-Nofuentes JA
J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(1):56-81. PubMed ID: 29584541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simple nonparametric confidence regions for the evaluation of continuous-scale diagnostic tests.
Adimari G; Chiogna M
Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(1):Article 24. PubMed ID: 21969980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biological variation: Evaluation of methods for constructing confidence intervals for estimates of within-person biological variation for different distributions of the within-person effect.
Røraas T; Støve B; Petersen PH; Sandberg S
Clin Chim Acta; 2017 May; 468():166-173. PubMed ID: 28257883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Confidence intervals around Bayes Cost in multi-state diagnostic settings to estimate optimal performance.
Batterton KA; Schubert CM
Stat Med; 2014 Aug; 33(19):3280-99. PubMed ID: 24763997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. From diagnostic accuracy to accurate diagnosis: interpreting a test result with confidence.
Zou G
Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 15155020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Benefit-risk assessment for binary diagnostic tests.
Bai T; Huang L; Li M; Tiwari R
J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(5):760-775. PubMed ID: 31498711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.
Islam N; Salameh JP; Leeflang MM; Hooft L; McGrath TA; van der Pol CB; Frank RA; Kazi S; Prager R; Hare SS; Dennie C; Spijker R; Deeks JJ; Dinnes J; Jenniskens K; Korevaar DA; Cohen JF; Van den Bruel A; Takwoingi Y; van de Wijgert J; Wang J; McInnes MD;
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Nov; 11():CD013639. PubMed ID: 33242342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimating negative likelihood ratio confidence when test sensitivity is 100%: A bootstrapping approach.
Marill KA; Chang Y; Wong KF; Friedman AB
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1936-1948. PubMed ID: 26152746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
